We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Pantheon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can easily access and integrate data sources from other platforms."
"The most important thing is we don't have to maintain any physical infrastructure. With typical conventional on-premise solutions, we have to maintain many things like the hardware, clusters, etc. With this cloud platform, you don't have to worry about all those things. We have the service always available, and this is the main advantage. I like that we use everything on our standard Active Directory on on-premises on Azure. The key advantage is that you can have the sole indication based on the cloud. This isn't possible with an on-premise Active Directory. This enables work from home and at the office because it's on the cloud."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is that it is easy to use."
"Installation is easy as it's cloud-based. Performance is good. It's stable and scalable."
"Azure is very flexible and easy to manage."
"It is quick and easy to deploy. It is flexible, and we can deploy a resource anytime. We like and prefer the pay-as-you-go model."
"The pricing is quite good, and it is designed as pay-per-use."
"Managed storage capabilities, which create a very simple way to create, copy, and replicate local or geo-replicate, it's very simple to assign workloads."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"I think it would be good to keep making progress on giving users the ability to do action calls on Data Factory. Right now, it's mostly local. Perhaps Microsoft could add the ability to put some calls in the workflow."
"Predictability and quality. Make sure things work predictable, as expected, and documented."
"Compared with other cloud solution providers, Microsoft is not good at local support."
"The technical support is good, but the response time is poor."
"Navigating the frequent changes in the interface has been a challenge, requiring effort to keep up with updates. Options or features that were once located in one window may unexpectedly move to another, making it hard to stay current with the changes."
"Microsoft Azure is so complicated inside. If you should do something internally, if you have to configure something, the opinion about Azure is that it is a little complicated inside. That's why the end users and clients are looking for help and why we help them configure and do anything inside of Azure. That is why we offer other tools to optimize the Azure environment."
"Integrate as a service. A lot of Microsoft software licensing options aren’t yet in Azure. Also, the ability to integrate with other technologies, such as other options on the market based on RISC Technologies."
"The solution could be easier to use. However, when comparing it to AWS it is a bit easier."
"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 299 reviews while Pantheon is ranked 20th in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Pantheon is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pantheon writes "The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Pantheon is most compared with Amazon AWS, Acquia Cloud, SAP Cloud Platform, GoDaddy and Cloudways. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Pantheon report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.