We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Oracle Beehive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Content Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself."
"It is a decent tool for collaboration, especially if you are already using other Office products."
"Document management and records management features are the most valuable."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the fact that it doesn't require coding. You just need to configure it. You don't need to code before getting something running. It makes it very fast."
"The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect."
"The level of stability is good."
"The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."
"The support from Microsoft is very quick and they are very proactive."
"This solution has automated protection from downtime. High-availability is built into every component, and the backups are completely automated."
"We have really high level of services, performance, availability, and it is stable. Everything works together really well."
"This solution is not very stable. It is useful to arrange data but it's not the best for big data. Sometimes we have issues with our reports as a result."
"Workflows could be simplified."
"It is a bit restrictive to develop in the cloud version. A lot of features are in the cloud now, and you have to develop on the outside. As far as the platform and the programming side of things are concerned, it is moving more towards configuration management rather than programming. When we are doing solutions, we are basically just configuring it to make solutions happen rather than actually using the Visual Studio code and developing from scratch in the cloud. It is almost like creating an app. You have created an app for your phone, but the app doesn't really sit on your phone. It sits somewhere on a server, and the database sits on another server. The app is just pulling and pushing information. The whole development has changed. We used to install things directly on the server and then run the application from the server. Now, it is more of a modular architecture."
"The product is behind in development and lacks some features."
"Sharepoint doesn't integrate well with Oracle, and we use a lot of Oracle products at our company. Therefore, it makes more sense for us to go to Oracle instead of continuing to use Sharepoint."
"The solution needs to have more flexibility. The classic version had more flexibility, however, the modern version has many more limitations."
"The ability to preview files in different formats should be expanded to include formats such as embedded postscript (EPS), AutoCAD, and Adobe Acrobat PDF."
"The permission management features need improvement."
"The price of licenses is high and should be improved."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Oracle Beehive is ranked 26th in Content Collaboration Platforms. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while Oracle Beehive is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Beehive writes "Has an excellent Database Management System and high level of services, performance, and availability". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace and FileCloud, whereas Oracle Beehive is most compared with . See our Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive report.
See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.