We performed a comparison between Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The data transmissions between the data models is the most valuable feature."
"We can store the data in a data lake for a very low cost."
"It is not a pricey product compared to other data warehouse solutions."
"The solution's integration is good."
"Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse provides good firewall processing in terms of response time."
"It performs very well overall."
"One of the most important features is the ease of using MS SQL."
"Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution."
"Transformation is a valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver. I can transform the data as per my needs or my client's needs. For example, flat tables can be transformed with respect to our requirements to combine multiple modules into one single table, and we can derive analytics."
"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."
"A robust and efficient product."
"It is a robust system."
"It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."
"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."
"Data modeling is a valuable feature."
"I would like the ability to do more real-time type updates instead of batch-oriented updates."
"It needs more compatibility with common BI tools."
"The query is slow if we don't optimize it."
"They need to incorporate a machine learning engine."
"We'd like to see it be a bit more compatible with other solutions."
"I would like the tool to support different operating systems."
"I think that the error messages need to be made more specific."
"It could offer more development across the solution."
"Design and modeling could be simplified."
"It is difficult when your native language is not English. It is difficult for us to explain our issue and also difficult for the technical team to explain a resolution to us."
"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."
"The product could provide more features."
"The program is difficult to learn to use"
"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."
"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."
More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 9th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is ranked 15th in Data Warehouse with 9 reviews. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6, while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "An easy to setup tool that allows its users to write stored procedure, making it a scalable product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse writes "Powerful solution with good security and audit procedure features". Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA and Snowflake, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is most compared with SAP BW4HANA and SAP Business Warehouse. See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.