We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Microsoft Teams is user-friendly and flexible. I like its SharePoint feature also."
"Compared to Zoom, Microsoft Teams is a very good solution and works well."
"File sharing is the most valuable feature."
"Arranging online meetings is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration with SharePoint where we can access it with a single click from the platform. The solution is available in web and mobile versions so it gives a seamless experience when we move from one device to another. Especially when you're on the calls, you don't need to get out of one device, and then log in to another, and then join that meeting. You need to just switch."
"It is an excellent all-around communications tool that works well for business purposes."
"The solution has improved internal collaboration. We can seamlessly interact on a number of documents by projecting them on the screen. This experience is not with internal teams but with clients as well."
"We didn't face any problems with the product's scalability. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The search feature is valuable."
"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."
"SharePoint has an option where you can open files on the browser, whereby more than five people can make amendments to one Excel online file."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"Its most valuable feature is the document library."
"It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"We can arrange all our documents on one platform and see the document's changes and edits."
"It would be better if Microsoft Teams can link us to the internet on the screen sharing mode during the meeting."
"The solution's recording could be improved because it is not as good as other products."
"At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement."
"I think the ability to use a whiteboard in the solution is not very simple."
"It's not as easy to augment your meetings as it is with competitors. For example, in Zoom, if I want to add attendees, I just grab the meeting link and post it to them. With Teams, how to do this is not as clear."
"Its stability could be better."
"The solution's feature for scheduling meetings could be faster for Android phones. It should work okay like its desktop version."
"The way we test the audio devices must be improved."
"Emails stored now do not display metadata in native format."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"The product does not perform 100% when used outside of a Microsoft based browser, Chrome, Firefox, etc."
"SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve."
"The product must provide more automation."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
"More hints and make it more user-customizable."
"Document management and the ability to easily integrate single sign-on (SSO) are areas for improvement in SharePoint."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, Symphony, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Objective ECM. See our Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint report.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
