We performed a comparison between NetWitness Platform and Palo Alto Networks WildFire based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It gives the capability for the incident response team to correlate logs to identify any kind of problem like malware and incidents in a general sense, both for logs and packets."
"The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult."
"Setting up NetWitness is straightforward. There are multiple connectors, including standard and specialized connectors. One purpose of the connectors is the enhanced capability integrate the custom applications. NetWitness comes with E6 appliances and application images that we use for the initial configurations and for the OS stack information. From there, you can consider the correlation rules, integrate the different log sources, and easily create correlation rules and backlog reports."
"The most valuable features are the threat prediction and network forensics."
"Incident management is its most valuable feature."
"NetWitness Platform is valuable for creating rules that the solution must detect."
"NetWitness can be highly beneficial for incident detection and response."
"The most valuable feature is the correlation. It can report in real-time and monitor the management."
"The most valuable features of the solution are user-friendliness, price, good security, and cloud-related options."
"A good tool for file scanning and email threat detection, especially when it comes to attachments and communications."
"The most valuable features are all of the security features in terms of protection and SSL and VPN."
"The cloud-based services are a nice feature."
"Stability is never a concern."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is how it keeps up-to-date with viruses."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks WildFire is its ability to adapt to environments and its robustness."
"Intuitive threat prevention and analysis solution, with a machine learning feature. Scalable, stable, and protects against zero-day threats."
"The log system is a bit complex and has room for improvement."
"The initial setup is very complex and should be simplified."
"More customizability is required, which is something that they need to improve on."
"Technical support could be improved."
"The initial setup is complex. There are other solutions that are easier to implement."
"If we have the ability to run a dynamic analysis through malware in the same suite, it would be great to have a sandbox solution to analyze malware through dynamic analysis."
"Nowadays, their support is a little subpar compared to other solutions. I rate RSA support six out of 10."
"It is not so easy to customize this product."
"The system performance degrades after the solution has been deployed for some time. The data that it gives us becomes a little bit slow. When you try to get some data for troubleshooting, it seems like it's working hard to extract that data."
"It would be nice if there was an easier way to install and deploy it, such as through the inclusion of wizards."
"I would give this product a rating of 9 out of 10 due to some slight issues of performance."
"They provide a medium level of technical support."
"They can keep on doing more updates. As new malware and viruses are coming out, they can make sure that WildFire is up to date."
"The GUI is better in 8.0, but I still feel it lacks the fast response most of us desire. Logs are much quicker."
"The product's false positive logs could be more user-friendly to understand. They could provide examples of precious cases to learn."
"The data analytical system for deployment needs to improve."
NetWitness Platform is ranked 19th in Log Management with 36 reviews while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 58 reviews. NetWitness Platform is rated 7.4, while Palo Alto Networks WildFire is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of NetWitness Platform writes "Can find out if there is lateral movement, but integration and workflow need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks WildFire writes "Good technical support and provides automatic analysis that saves us time in filtering email". NetWitness Platform is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, RSA enVision, IBM Security QRadar, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Palo Alto Networks WildFire is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate, Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Proofpoint Email Protection and Fortinet FortiSandbox. See our NetWitness Platform vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire report.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.