We performed a comparison between Odin Virtuozzo Containers and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"The fact that we have the ability to easily scale out, and the ability to do maintenance on the underlying hardware without impacting our business applications, are important aspects."
"The virtualization this solution offer is very complete for the infrastructure."
"The interface is good."
"We saved a lot of time and hardware with this solution. It also prevents fewer incidents."
"The roadmap for the product itself covers all of the features that we are looking for."
"Basic hypervisor functions with HA."
"Server Virtualization is the most important feature because that helps me to utilize 100% capacity of my physical server or box. Its redundancy, uptime, or high-availability is also valuable. Storage-sharing is also valuable. In vSAN, I can utilize the maximum storage. In the physical boxes, if you don't require storage, it lies idle, but with VMware or any kind of virtualization, you can utilize the full storage."
"The speed of the solution is excellent."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"The support for the latest version could be improved."
"The solution needs to improve its stability."
"We are provided with a mini dashboard that has been improved in the latest version but it still could be better. The monitoring is now available on the vCenter dashboard and the vROps has been added to the basic version that had to be purchased separately before. A complete dashboard has always been provided with some competitors, such as Nutanix."
"There is definitely room for improvement and that improvement should be in the licensing and the simplicity of procuring additional licenses or additional VMware products. Right now, it's very complex."
"When I use VMware and Citrix there are conflicts."
"An improvement could be in terms of keeping up with the upgrades. The upgrades could be set in an automated way so that the newer features don't require you to manually update, or you get an option to update automatically. This would be a useful enhancement."
"Both the price and the licensing fee are expensive, especially for our clients with a smaller workload."
"The biggest thing to improve is to have more self-service in the portals. I would like to receive more help through the web interface."
Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV Virtualization, Hyper-V and KVM, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM, VMware Workstation and KVM.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.