We compared Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap both receive positive user feedback, with Ubuntu praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive software repositories, and security features, while openSUSE Leap is commended for its stability, reliability, and strong community support. Differences lie in Ubuntu's affordability and ease of customization, compared to openSUSE Leap's advanced features like the Btrfs file system and Snapper tool. Users suggest Ubuntu improves performance, system optimization, user interface, and compatibility, while openSUSE Leap could enhance package management, interface, stability, boot times, hardware compatibility, and documentation.
Features: Ubuntu Linux is acclaimed for its user-friendly interface, extensive software repositories, regular updates, and excellent community support. In contrast, openSUSE Leap stands out for its stability, reliability, YaST package manager for easy software installation, and advanced features like the Btrfs file system and Snapper tool for system snapshots.
Pricing and ROI: In terms of setup cost, Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap both offer reasonable pricing structures. Users have found the setup process for Ubuntu Linux to be user-friendly and straightforward. The licensing for both products is flexible and accommodating for various usage requirements., Ubuntu Linux has a positive return on investment due to its affordability, compatibility with software and hardware, and improved efficiency. openSUSE Leap offers stability, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, with comprehensive documentation and efficient troubleshooting support.
Room for Improvement: Ubuntu Linux could improve performance, system optimization, user interface, compatibility with hardware and software, and regular updates. On the other hand, openSUSE Leap could enhance package management, user interface, stability, boot times, hardware compatibility, and documentation.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap indicate that the time required for establishing a new tech solution varies significantly. Some users mentioned spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others only required a week for both deployment and setup., Users have expressed satisfaction with the customer service and support provided by Ubuntu Linux, commending the team for their prompt, reliable, and professional assistance. On the other hand, openSUSE Leap customers appreciate the team's responsiveness, helpfulness, and efficient assistance in resolving issues.
The summary above is based on 28 interviews we conducted recently with Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"openSUSE Leap has helped me with using containers in Podman."
"I use openSUSE Leap as the base for the Kubernetes cluster we run in-house."
"The solution is easy for me to use because the backend is derived from FreeBSD and this is something I have been using for over 20 years."
"The most valuable feature by far has been the virtualization capabilities of the operating system."
"Stable - it just runs without the necessity to reboot."
"The solution is very stable after it is configured. It is hard to have a panel slow, a problem, misconfiguration, or any kind of loss function."
"It's great for security and it is very safe."
"The security is very good."
"It is stable and modern."
"The solution is flexible and user-friendly."
"It's faster than Windows."
"As we have repositories in my country, the ease of use and the open source nature of the solution are valuable features."
"The solution is stable, fast and free."
"I found using this solution pleasurable to learn since it is something different than Windows."
"In the future, the Active Directory could improve."
"The initial system setup or network configuration of the solution is not straightforward and can be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the console."
"Like most Linux-based operating systems, the biggest challenge Leap faces is the GUI."
"I would like openSUSE Leap to have better link integration with Windows."
"Somehow the change from OS12.x via 13.x to Leap was a bit bumpy and some old issues seemed to reappear."
"The solution could be more stable and secure."
"I find the solution could be easier to use, more flexible, user-friendly, and have a better UI."
"The product must enable automation using AI."
"Ubuntu Linux does not easily detect the drivers of new devices, and you need to do some trial and error for some of the third parties porting into it."
"The solution could improve by having the user interface use fewer resources."
"More security features are needed to protect the current file system to prevent attacks."
"The solution is a little complicated to customize and could be made easier."
"The solution could improve by having better integration."
openSUSE Leap is ranked 12th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 6 reviews while Ubuntu Linux is ranked 2nd in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 133 reviews. openSUSE Leap is rated 9.0, while Ubuntu Linux is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of openSUSE Leap writes "Good virtualization capabilities, stable, and cost-effective ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubuntu Linux writes "A stable and free solution that is easy to deploy and has a user-friendly GUI". openSUSE Leap is most compared with SUSE Linux Enterprise, Rocky Linux, CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Oracle Linux, whereas Ubuntu Linux is most compared with Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Windows Server and Oracle Solaris. See our Ubuntu Linux vs. openSUSE Leap report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.