OpenText SiteScope vs Splunk Enterprise Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText SiteScope
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (27th)
Splunk Enterprise Security
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
255
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (1st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (1st), IT Operations Analytics (1st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the market share of OpenText SiteScope is 0.2% and it decreased by 56.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Splunk Enterprise Security is 2.8% and it decreased by 48.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Log Management
17.6%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
13.7%
 

Featured Reviews

John Boake - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2022
We can query from a single location and nest all monitors within folders, but we should be able to manage all servers without having to log on to different servers and data centers
We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location. We've had it for quite a while, and I've never done an upgrade on it, but from what I understand, the upgrades are not as straightforward as you would think. I know that we've run into some issues related to porting the database through different versions. So, it's a slow slog. The process has been longer than expected. I don't like its licensing because you have to license it by individual licenses.
YK
May 8, 2024
Monitors the network and provides easy visibility into problems
The solution's most valuable feature is the dashboard, which allows us to see everything on the same page and provides easy visibility into problems. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped us find security events in our on-premises environment. It has helped improve our organization's ability to ingest and normalize data. Splunk does a good job of identifying and solving problems in real-time. We have reduce our alert volume by 80%. The solution provides relevant context to help guide our investigations. Splunk provides pretty detailed information. Based on that information, we can assign it to different teams. It has helped speed up our security investigations by 40%. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped reduce our mean time to resolve. In most cases, we're able to solve issues in less than 45 minutes.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring."
"It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."
"Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours."
"The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product."
"Our experiences with Micro Focus SiteScope have been mostly positive as we can easily work with multiple monitors and different types of monitors pretty quickly. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions for us through Micro Focus SiteScope, so we don't have to do that much custom coding for the vast majority of requests that we get for monitoring. There are some limitations that we've run into and some problems every once in a while, but they've been relatively minor."
"Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."
"It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration."
"The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily."
"Splunk UBA is useful for fraud detection and for detection of APTs, advanced persistent threats."
"Splunk Enterprise Security is able to process a huge amount of data without any issues."
"There are lots of free learning materials on their website."
"The feature that I have found most valuable with Splunk is the ability to sift through a bunch of data very quickly."
"It is easy to use in any environment."
"Out-of-the-box, it seems very powerful."
"Splunk is stable, and this is why many customers want it."
"Integrity with many vendors: This simplifies the implementation and integration with different devices"
 

Cons

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."
"The graphs and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement."
"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."
"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."
"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."
"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."
"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."
"We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope."
"It would be good if the solution had some kind of copilot to automate or help write correlation searches."
"The search could be improved. Now, it is a bit difficult to write search queries because they become quite long, then maintaining those long search queries is a quite challenging."
"Some of the search functions can be better. There has been a lot of talk at the conference about the update of SPL before each iteration. That will be a lot of help."
"Splunk is not very user-friendly. It has a complex architecture in comparison to other solutions on the market."
"It will be helpful for customers if they can create some real-world cases, and we can find a case study to align with. I know that Splunk has tremendous potential. We only include a tiny piece of it. There is a lot of stuff that we need to learn. If Splunk can provide more real-time examples, that will be helpful for customers."
"There is a definite learning curve to starting out."
"The presence of multiple layers creates a significant challenge for monitoring across cloud environments."
"We'd like to have the number of devices covered under the license to be increased."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."
"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."
"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."
"Licensing is a little steep."
"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."
"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."
"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."
"The solution is costly."
"I work on the technical side, so I don't know precise figures. However, I know that Splunk is a premium product, so it's somewhat costly. Still, you get a lot of unique features for the money."
"Splunk Enterprise Security is affordable."
"Splunk Enterprise Security is expensive."
"The pricing is very complicated, and it is very pricey. You do require a lot of different licenses in order to get a comprehensive solution that is not just the SIEM solution."
"Our customers often complain that the price of Splunk is too high."
"Splunk is really expensive compared to all the other tools on the market, including Microsoft Sentinel."
"Setup cost is cheap: It is free, it is user-friendly, and it is fast."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
30%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
I would rate the pricing of SiteScope as a five out of ten in terms of costliness. It is not overly expensive, but there is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness in some areas.
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
In terms of improvement, OpenText SiteScop could become a better solution by adding more monitoring templates, like RedScope, to make it easier to track specific technologies. It should also improv...
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText SiteScope vs. Splunk Enterprise Security and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.