We performed a comparison between PageUp People and Workday based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The talent acquisition and the onboarding components of the system are most valuable."
"The most helpful Workday features for our HR processes were in HCM, particularly in areas like talent, compensation, benefits, and learning."
"Workday is easy to use. Timesheet and resource management are also easy."
"It's a fully consolidated system. All the transactions and configuration are co-located in one fully in-memory system, so there is no need to go to different data sources (multiple DBs) to pull data; it’s all in one place."
"The most valuable feature of Workday is the ease of navigation to browse the application. The solution can hold information about the company and people with accounts can be discovered by others in the whole company."
"It's actually a cloud-native solution and based on the community for development. It is a very good open architecture and able to interconnect with other systems. And it is very stable and very fast in terms of response."
"Workday's best features are planning and finance."
"It is quite user-friendly."
"The software is easy to learn and use. When compared to SAP HR and SAP HCM, the tool is easy to access and understand. We have a hierarchy and structural connectivity in Workday. There is a certification for the solution and when we do it, we become the certified partners of the company"
"They could probably add surveying, as in engagement surveys, to their product. That would be something that would be valued by their customers. For instance, Culture Amp is a product that does a lot of the engagement stuff. They're diversifying into other aspects of talent management. It is not yet at the same scale as PageUp People, but it is an excellent product as well."
"The solution can be improved by speeding up the load time when pulling up information."
"It's possible that the way things are integrated could be improved"
"There is a lot of complexity in the configuration of this solution."
"There could be a web-based application for making payments to the employees."
"This solution could be improved by providing user-level access to customization capabilities. Users currently rely on more technical teams to customize reports, for example."
"The implementation could have gone a little smoother."
"It is very unique as compared to other tools in terms of the employee master data and how it is organized. That's why sometimes the information needs to sit in two different systems because, in Workday, it is organized differently. This issue is not related to benefits. It is more or so related to how you categorize employees. I don't think this is a problem that could be solved. Workday is aware of this. It is one of those kinds of situations that you just got to live with."
"The solution should be more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
PageUp People is ranked 29th in Talent Management while Workday is ranked 2nd in Talent Management with 51 reviews. PageUp People is rated 7.8, while Workday is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PageUp People writes "Has all-inclusive pricing and good talent acquisition and onboarding components, and is an excellent product for mid-sized to large organizations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workday writes "The solution's interface is clean, organized, and easy to use ". PageUp People is most compared with UKG and SAP SuccessFactors, whereas Workday is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG. See our PageUp People vs. Workday report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Talent Acquisition vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.