We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trend Micro Deep Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."
"I find the malware protection very handy."
"You can scale the product."
"Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good."
"It's a monster, it's got so many beautiful features. We do deal with other firewalls and we've got a better idea of what other firewalls' capabilities are, any comparison with the Palo Alto I liked the quality of service on the applications that you can control the amount of bandwidth an application is allowed to consume. The best feature is the quality of the application quality of service."
"The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features."
"Generally speaking, it just gives us a broad understanding of exactly what kind of threats occur. The submission point, analyzing point, and virtualization are within the environment that it supports. It helped us to improve our security levels and protect our internal network from any threats outside."
"The most valuable features are monitoring for advanced persistent threats, the system runs in a sandbox allowing for effective zero-day exploits management, and the Inspector has a built-in sandbox."
"The most valuable features are the protection and that it is fast."
"The HTML file sandboxing is very good."
"The tool's stability and performance are good."
"The product is very easy to install."
"I like the sales operations testing. and support."
"It is a very good solution. It is very light, and it is quite quick to figure out the problem in your network."
"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement."
"It's not so easy to set up a test environment, because it's not so easy to get the test license. The vendor only gives you 90 days for a test license; it's a tough license to get."
"I think they can use some improvement on FID."
"The organization mail security solutions could be improved. There is no mail security solution available."
"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."
"The solution should support multiple platforms in Windows, Linux, and Mac. Customers can have different software types. The virtual environment should be able to install and analyze them. The tool also gives only a minimum level of extension support. It may not be able to extract files and give details about them. I would also like to see third-party product integration in the tool. The solution's current integration is only with Trend Micro products only."
"The solution could be more stable and offer more security."
"Scalability becomes an issue when managing a higher number of customers."
"The stability of the solution could be improved. It should be 100% stable, but it's not there right now."
"The solution needs improvement in terms of pricing."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery is a very expensive solution, making it very hard to sell."
"The solution could be more secure."
"Some of the end users may not be technically proficient, so they occasionally face problems due to a lack of knowledge."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is ranked 7th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 24 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 6th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 24 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is rated 8.8, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention writes "A good amount of granularity and advanced URL filtering capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Good threat detection capabilities and offers flexibility for hosting options". Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is most compared with Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Arista NDR, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System and Vectra AI, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Arista NDR, Vectra AI and Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise. See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro Deep Discovery report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
