We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Email Protection and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Barracuda Networks, IRONSCALES and others in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)."There is no downtime."
"The solution blocks malicious emails containing viruses and malware and reduces them out of spam."
"The archive feature is valuable."
"A one-stop shop for email protection"
"The spam filter for email is good."
"Proofpoint Email Protection is stable enough and does its job of virus, malware, and email scam detection. Setting it up is not too complicated."
"It's a mature product. It does a good job in detection."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the network security module."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design."
"The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."
"Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening."
"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."
"The product is very easy to configure."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from how it allows users to do the investigation part. Another important part of the product that is valuable is associated with how it gives information to users in the form of a storyline."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Proofpoint has a lot of false alarms."
"Sometimes it detects false positives."
"Integration for reporting needs to be improved, it's too complex."
"The solution should add post-sales training."
"We'd like to have the ability to create more customized reports."
"Some use cases haven't been dealt with yet."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."
"It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment."
"There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management."
"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
"As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web)."
"Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone."
"It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."
"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Proofpoint Email Protection is ranked 1st in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 46 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 37 reviews. Proofpoint Email Protection is rated 8.4, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Email Protection writes "A reasonably priced product that offers protection to emails, along with spam filters". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". Proofpoint Email Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Secure Email and Fortinet FortiMail, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiGate, Zscaler Internet Access and Vectra AI.
We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
