We performed a comparison between Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection and Trellix Collaboration Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)."It has a dynamic runtime engine, which gives it an advantage over Prisma that has a static engine. In Prisma, we have to do additional malware analysis, which is not required in Proofpoint."
"FireEye is good for malware depicting and security."
"I like FireEye's filtering, spam digests, and its advanced threat review of email flow. It also has a broad range of riskware rules you can deploy."
"The product helps reduce the number of malicious emails reaching the user's inbox."
"We have had very good results from the use of FireEye Email Security. We are very comfortable with this technology, but I don't know if it's necessary to move into the cloud, we will check other technologies and study them. Additionally, the solution has good integration."
"We can control this solution from the cloud and are able to access it from wherever we are."
"The product protects my email."
"One of the valuable features of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement the tool in our environment."
"FireEye Email Security is easy to use."
"We are using the TRAP console that has a Linux-based UI, which is not user-friendly. The TAP console looks very advanced. Currently, we are maintaining three different consoles, and it is sometimes hard to switch between them or try to grab the data."
"The spam detection feature could be better."
"The reporting aspect of the solution needs improvement."
"The solution needs better support."
"FireEye needs single sign-on. They say it's on their roadmap. They should also implement support for Microsoft Authenticator app for 2FA."
"Sometimes especially zero-day spam emails can be passed to the user's inbox."
"The solution must provide features to scan QR codes for threats."
"In general, our company should make the tool more robust to protect our systems."
"The custom tailoring is limited."
More Trellix Collaboration Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is ranked 23rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) while Trellix Collaboration Security is ranked 17th in Email Security with 13 reviews. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is rated 7.0, while Trellix Collaboration Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection writes "Dynamic runtime engine and good protection, but needs better support and a single console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Collaboration Security writes "Has an easy implementation phase to deal with for users". Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Microsoft Defender for Identity and IRONSCALES, whereas Trellix Collaboration Security is most compared with Cisco Secure Email, Proofpoint Email Protection, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Trend Micro Email Security.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.