We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides."
"Rapid7 InsightVM has given us a practical view of the vulnerabilities present in our organization."
"It is good and fits well with pretty much all of our use case needs."
"The performance is good."
"The most important aspect of the solution is that it rarely gives false positives, especially compared to other products. It provides very clear reports for our IT teams to look at."
"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."
"The assessment is most valuable."
"This solution is very easy to use and easy to install."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"Within InsightVM, there is no feature to assign a ticket. If we can have more API calls, we can do that from InsightVM."
"The drawback is that it is still not a fully SaaS solution, so you must deploy a console."
"I would say that it improved our visibility, but it left things open."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
"I would like to see more integration."
"They should integrate the solution with multiple products."
"The reporting could be better."
"Some of our customers want to be completely cloud based, and Rapid7 doesn't offer this as an option."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Black Kite.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.