We performed a comparison between Selenium HQ and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"Selenium WebDriver and Selenium IDE are useful."
"What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do."
"All the features in Selenium to automate the UI."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good."
"The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer."
"We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
"You need to have experience in order to do the initial setup."
"Selenium HQ can improve the authorization login using OTP, it is not able to be done in this solution."
"Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code."
"It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements."
"Selenium could offer better ways to record and create scripts. IDE is available, however, it can be improved."
"Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be."
"The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing."
"The solution's deployment is not very easy and should be made easier."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 103 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. Selenium HQ is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Easy to use with great pricing and lots of documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our Selenium HQ vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
