We performed a comparison between Statseeker and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."
"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."
"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"Templates are good. We download them from the official Zabbix site or the community. If the information we need isn't available, we create custom templates based on client requirements."
"Simple network monitoring that is easy to install and manage."
"During my testing, the features that I like the most are that it can be integrated with my system, and it provides me with reports of all of my servers."
"The product is very stable."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"The initial setup was very quick. The first time it was long because I didn't know it yet. I was only using Windows. The first time was very difficult because of the operating system."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."
"We haven't seen an ROI."
"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."
"I think the reporting part of Zabbix can be improved in terms of more user-friendly graphics to display the collected data. Many simple users who don't know how to use Zabbix properly might get confused by the reporting, although at the same time it is very versatile for my company."
"My company wanted to do an exercise command to access IT from Cameroon. They wanted to access an FSS to a second host with second equipment that was on another coast but it is not possible on Zabbix to do it. They want to directly access from the front-end of Zabbix to access a prompt in Zabbix to an access terminal. In the front-end, there is no way to do that. That would be an important improvement."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"The integration of the product is not so easy, especially when it comes to the application database."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"The GUI could be more intuitive. Also, we'd like streaming telemetry. Zabbix might have this feature, but I haven't seen it yet. It took us a long time to get started because the documentation isn't very descriptive. We had to go through various sources like YouTube and forums to get this solution working."
"Zabbix can use better documentation and support for troubleshooting."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Statseeker is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Statseeker is most compared with , whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Amazon CloudWatch and SolarWinds NPM. See our Statseeker vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
