We performed a comparison between Veracode and Virsec Security Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes."
"The installation was straightforward."
"Veracode creates a list of issues. You can go through them one by one and click through to a new window with all the information about the issue discovered."
"It has provided what we were looking for in such an application, meaning static application security testing functionality. That was what we were interested in."
"The most valuable feature is the efficiency of the tool in finding vulnerabilities."
"The benefits are quick discovery and understanding of software vulnerabilities that we are putting in our own code. By discovering them quickly enough, we can triage them and determine the best ways to remediate them and prevent them from happening in the future."
"The most valuable feature is the SAST capability and its integration into the Veracode pipelines."
"Before Veracode, the application was deployed to the production server and there would be a lot of bugs and issues. Once we implemented the Veracode scan, the full deployment issues were drastically reduced."
"We use the solution for Zero-day protection."
"The user interface can sometimes be a little challenging to work with, and they seem to be changing their algorithm on what is an issue. I understand why they do it, but it sometimes causes more work on our end."
"It's taking too much time to do a quality scan."
"There should be more APIs, especially in SCA, to get some results or automate some things."
"Veracode's container scanning could be improved. We containerize all the platforms we use inside a Docker image. For example, we create a Microsoft Docker image that we build our application on top of. I would like Veracode to implement IT scans before we commit the code."
"I'd like to see more development tools and platforms integrated together with Veracode to amplify the solution's effectiveness."
"Searching for applications in Veracode is a little bit difficult. We have to minimize the length of an application's name to 47 characters. It would be good if this limit could be increased so that an application's name can be properly reflected in Veracode."
"Sometimes, the scans halt or drop for some reason, and we need to get help from Veracode to fix it."
"We are testing Veracode's software composition analysis, but we're having trouble integrating it with SVN. It works out of the box when you use Git but doesn't work as well with other tools like SVN. It's more geared toward Git"
"The tool's dashboard needs to load since it is not responsive and takes time to load."
Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security Tools with 194 reviews while Virsec Security Platform is ranked 35th in Application Security Tools with 1 review. Veracode is rated 8.2, while Virsec Security Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Virsec Security Platform writes "Helps with Zero-day protection ". Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and OWASP Zap, whereas Virsec Security Platform is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, CrowdStrike Falcon and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
