Reliable message delivery and mirroring.
Manager, Site Reliability Engineering at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Provides message delivery and mirroring. It does not scale out well.
Pros and Cons
- "Reliable message delivery and mirroring."
- "It does not scale out well. It ends up being very complex if you have a lot of mirror queues."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
It does not scale out well. It ends up being very complex if you have a lot of mirror queues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We did have scalability issues. It does not scale out well.
How are customer service and support?
As with a lot of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software), it is what you pay for.
Buyer's Guide
ActiveMQ
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about ActiveMQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This is our first foray into the world of messages.
How was the initial setup?
The terminology and configuration took some time to learn. In some ways, it does not do what you think it will do, so be careful.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at RabbitMQ and AWS SQS.
What other advice do I have?
If you are getting started, go with Kafka.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Freelancer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The product provides message-level acknowledging and message persistency.
What is most valuable?
Most valuable to us are fast asynchronous message queuing with message-level acknowledging and message persistency.
How has it helped my organization?
ActiveMQ operates as the message bus across single-purpose components. Thanks to ActiveMQ, the system is able to scale its heavy computing components during traffic peaks.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see improvement in the clustering brokers. Configuring ActiveMQ brokers for working in a cluster is difficult and has many constraints. Also, the configuration files are not intuitive.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using ActiveMQ for about 6 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not encountered any stability issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The only issue we had concerned the practical limit of 2000 messages per broker, per second. The next step, which is multiplying brokers, worked well though.
How is customer service and technical support?
I have not used technical support so far.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup is quite complex when done for a high performance system. The configuration files are not intuitive.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ActiveMQ Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Product Categories
Message Queue (MQ) SoftwarePopular Comparisons
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
IBM MQ
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
Amazon SQS
PubSub+ Platform
Red Hat AMQ
EMQX
Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service
Aurea CX Messenger
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ActiveMQ Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between ActiveMQ and IBM MQ?
- What is the biggest difference between ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ?
- When evaluating Message Queue, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What Message Queue (MQ) Software do you recommend? Why?
- What is the best MQ software out there?
- What is MQ software?