ActiveMQ vs Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service comparison

Apache and Oracle are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Apache is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7, while Oracle is ranked #11. Apache holds a 31.2% mindshare in MQ, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution.

ActiveMQ

Read 26 ActiveMQ reviews

8,393 Views
4,952 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service

574 Views
517 Comparison Views

ActiveMQ

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ActiveMQ and Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ActiveMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

11th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of ActiveMQ is 31.2%, up from 24.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service is 3.9%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Eyob Alemu

Technical Director at NIDP

Efficient data flow management with high performance and occasional stability improvements

For high traffic volumes where management time on ActiveMQ is minimal and where the rate of flow from the provider is slower than from the consumer, ActiveMQ offers the highest performance based on our experience. It has been efficient for data flow control between two endpoints, despite occasional unexpected glitches. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Read full review

Use Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveMQ?

For reliable messaging, the most valuable feature of ActiveMQ for us is ensuring prompt message delivery.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveMQ?

We need to address the non-deterministic load issues. Sometimes, ActiveMQ either restarts automatically or goes into ActiveMQ mode, causing interruptions. We need to enhance stability and improve t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveMQ?

We have a digital ID platform that uses various services running on Kafka. There are two main endpoints where services interact with external services. These include an automatic biometric service ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM MQ vs ActiveMQ

Compared 45% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveMQ

Compared 18% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs ActiveMQ

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon SQS vs ActiveMQ

Compared 6% of the time

PubSub+ Platform vs ActiveMQ

Compared 5% of the time

More ActiveMQ Competitors

Amazon SQS vs Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service

Compared 83% of the time

Amazon MQ vs Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

IBM MQ vs Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

More Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveMQ

December 2024

Download ActiveMQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

December 2024

Download Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

AMQ

No data available

Learn More

Apache

Oracle

Overview

Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service delivers the power of Kafka as a managed streaming data platform integrated into the Oracle Cloud ecosystem. Create Topics and start streaming or manage and deploy your own Dedicated Kafka Cluster with Elastic Scalability.

Sample Customers

University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Message Queue (MQ) Software

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.