Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Reviews

I use the product for its availability and scalability features.

The solution is highly scalable. If one of the instances has some issue and the server is terminated, or if the production is running on a server and it gets shut down, we would not have any backup plan. We will have to recreate another server and run production. The product helps us by creating another server automatically within a minimum amount of time. This process decreases the impact on production and downtime. The product fulfills all my requirements.

The existing instance should not be terminated during scale in and scale out. The product does not explain why a particular instance is terminated. There is no option to check the log either.

I have been using the solution for two years.

We have not found any bug in the solution in the last two years.

The product is stable. Around 100 people use the product in our organization.

We can easily deploy the product if we have the documentation. The document is good enough.

The product is cheap.

The solution is cloud-based. If one of our CPUs or memory has an issue or is being utilized more than usual, another instance scales up automatically. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

It is used to run applications.

There is room for improvement in the pricing model. 

I have been using this solution for five to ten years now. 

It is a stable solution. 

It is a scalable solution. It is extensively used in our organization. We have over 5,000 users in our organization. 

The initial setup is straightforward. It was pretty quick to deploy the solution. 

The deployment was done in-house. It took only 20 minutes to deploy the solution. We have a CloudFormation template, and we deploy using that.

The pricing model is usage-based. 

I would definitely recommend using the solution. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. It is easy to use. 

We have EC2-based architectures. We deploy our applications on EC2. We also use Amazon RDS.

The operating system, Amazon Linux, is valuable. We like it very much. The availability of the instance is valuable. The documentation is good. We can use Systems Manager to manage nodes and Patch Manager to manage patches. The solution provides a variety of features.

The tool must provide proper guidelines to troubleshoot connectivity issues. It must also improve AMI creation.

I have been using the solution for the last four years.

The product’s stability is perfect. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the product’s scalability a ten out of ten. It is made for scalability. We have 20 users. We are planning to increase usage.

The support is good.

The tool is very easy to deploy. I like the new interface. The time taken for deployment depends on our requirements. It is a cloud-based tool. Sometimes, we use the CloudFormation template. Sometimes, we do it manually. Generally, it takes around five minutes. We create CloudFormation stacks to deploy the tool depending on the type of instance we require. We need more than ten technical team members to deploy and maintain the solution.

We deployed the solution ourselves using the documentation.

The availability is valuable. It is very useful to deploy the instances automatically.

The solution is not expensive.

The product is very helpful. It has various features that we can utilize. Overall, I rate the product a ten out of ten.

The tool serves several purposes. It helps to pass instances automatically. We can perform maintenance on instances and application upgrades.

The solution incorporates ease of maintenance and reduction in operational overhead and costs. Patching is also easy. 

The most valuable feature is the tool's ability to integrate with load balancers. 

The launch configuration feature doesn't work properly. It needs to improve the load configuration feature along with launch templates. The tool needs to tag feature as well. 

I have been working with the solution since 2016. 

I rate Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling's stability a ten out of ten. 

I rate the tool's scalability an eight-point five out of ten. 

I rate Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling's pricing a seven out of ten. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

We use EC2 as a disaster-recovery target and also to host a web server. We've got a demo account that uses AT&T Azure managed services where customers can log into our software. 

I like the fact that you don't need to pay for it when you aren't using it, especially in a disaster recovery scenario. The pricing is transparent, so you know what you're going to pay for it. 

If your EC2 instance doesn't boot up, you're in the dark about what's happening. It would be amazing if you could get a view of the console to see the status. There's something called the AWS Console, which is a web portal. I would like to see a virtual screen of an instance that hasn't started properly, so I can see where it crashed. 

I have used EC2 Auto-Scaling for eight years.

EC2 is stable.

EC2 is scalable.

It has gotten much easier to launch an EC2 instance over the years. It's straightforward. We can sign up for EC2 and other web services in a few minutes. Maintenance is something that only comes into play during a disaster recovery scenario. 

I rate Amazon EC2 Auto-Scaling nine out of 10. I recommend setting up billing alarms and paying attention to them. With a cloud platform, it's possible to get a surprise bill if you do something that is running up charges when you aren't aware. 

We use Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling for production nodes to manage varying loads during peak business hours. It provides the flexibility of auto-scaling infrastructure when there is high traffic.

The product’s most valuable feature is the seamless resizing of web connection.

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling’s filtering features need improvement. The support to manage the processes could be better. Whenever the product stops working, we have to change the settings and require to find the root cause of the issues. These instance logs should be managed by AWS itself.

We have been using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling for seven years.

The product is stable.

We have 1000 Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling users. The platform’s scalability features are flexible. We have recently added a few more nodes, and it was easy to change those configurations. It saves costs and time for us.

My recent experience with technical support is pleasant. They are thorough and quick to contact and coordinate with different teams to resolve the root cause.

We use OpenStack, InfraCloud, and other cloud vendors.

The initial setup process is straightforward. AWS has a user-friendly UI; we also have information and guidance available on their platform. The initial migration process from on-premises to on-cloud takes time.

The deployment process requires having specific knowledge about the application, including its limitations, dependency analysis, and a backup plan. It is preferable to run it in a lower environment and then do actual deployment. If you have a proper plan, it is easy.

The implementation can be in-house. But depending on the team size and management’s decision, we take help from third-party vendors.

We can reduce our infrastructure cost drastically using the product. We have received a good ROI.

The product is expensive. There are no licensing fees, but we have to pay for resources.

I rate Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling a seven out of ten.

I advise others to plan carefully. The major challenge is to understand performance and load requirements. You can decide the minimum capacity to be optimized and not over-provision it. Additionally, you can run it in a lower environment before going into production. You can figure out the parameters using CloudOps metrics.

I use the solution in my personal time. I like to play with it and learn a bit of software.

The solution is very easy to use, and its APIs are also very good.

The product's great, but the pricing could be improved.

I've been working with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling for a few years.

I rate EC2's stability a ten out of ten.

The workspace is something EC2 has embedded, so it's quite good. They have different options to work with it. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. I'm the only one using the solution.`

EC2 takes a few minutes to deploy. We have more than one option while deploying the solution. We can use the GUI or the command line, making it possible to use the solution's APIs.

The solution can be implemented in-house with the proper knowledge.

You need some contracts to get support for EC2.

EC2 is a good place to start if you have some good ideas for a business because you can avoid upfront expenses. I believe you can do the same things with Amazon as with Google, Microsoft, or many other companies.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten because you must still learn how to use it first.

We use EC2 to host applications.

The most useful feature is elasticity. You can scale up or down based on traffic.

The primary area for improvement is the pricing model. 

We have been using EC2 for around 36 months.

I rate EC2 nine out of 10 for stability.

I rate EC2 eight out of 10 for scalability. 

I rate AWS support nine out of 10. 

Positive

I rate EC2 eight out of 10 for ease of setup. The deployment takes four to six hours. Once the application is bundled, it is transported to Site Reliability Engineering, which hosts it. The deployment team consists of four or five people.

We've saved money on resources and infrastructure. The ROI can't be easily defined because it is a cloud service.

I rate EC2 seven out of 10 for affordability. 

I rate AWS EC2 nine out of 10. I recommend it for base production systems.