We use it for migration only, specifically to transfer storage from our normal data center to AWS for migration purposes.
Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Highly secure and easy to transfer storage solution
Pros and Cons
- "AWS Direct Connect is highly secure and much faster compared to normal network infrastructure."
- "It can be difficult to configure compared to cloud-based GUIs."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
AWS Direct Connect is highly secure and much faster compared to normal network infrastructure. It can be difficult to configure compared to cloud-based GUIs, but that's also the main advantage of using it.
What needs improvement?
It would be better if the setup and configuration of credentials were easier.
For how long have I used the solution?
We are using Amazon S3 buckets for storage and the software UCS 3 bucket and Cloud Network Director. We have also been using AWS Direct Connect for the past year.
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
April 2025

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Palo Alto Networks, Lumen Technologies and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: April 2025.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution. 15 members are using it for migration purposes. We use the data connector for migration and direct connector setup for networking.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution.
How was the initial setup?
Initially, it was difficult for us as we not only wanted to use Direct Connect but also link it with our existing data center. So we faced difficulties at the architectural level. We even had difficulties configuring security policies and credentials such as user ID and password. It took almost five to six months to completely setup the solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend it because it is secure and faster compared to conventional networking. Moreover, it's designed primarily for migration purposes.
Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.


Buyer's Guide
Download our free Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report and find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Palo Alto Networks, Lumen Technologies, and more!
Updated: April 2025
Product Categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPNPopular Comparisons
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
Fortinet FortiClient
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
Ivanti Connect Secure
Tailscale
SonicWall Netextender
Sangfor SSL VPN
AWS PrivateLink
SonicWall Connect Tunnel
Google Cloud VPN
Lumen MPLS IP VPN
IBM Secure Gateway Service
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report and find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Palo Alto Networks, Lumen Technologies, and more!
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How does AWS Direct Connect compare with PrivateLink?
- What is the difference between "data protection in transit" vs "data protection at rest"?
- What are the best practices to prevent a Brute Force attack via remote access?
- Looking for a piece of advice and tips on the deployment of VPN concentrators for SD-WAN tunnels?
- When evaluating Enterprise Infrastructure VPN, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- How does remote work influence DevOps?
- What tools do you use to make a remote work more efficient?
- What are your recommended best practices and tools to prevent cloud jacking in your organization?
- What enterprise infrastructure VPN solution do you use?
- Why is an enterprise infrastructure VPN solution important?