Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer2563050 - PeerSpot reviewer
President of the Advisory Board at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Reseller
Top 20
Reliable core firewall enables secure and efficient transactions
Pros and Cons
  • "Check Point's solutions allow organizations to operate securely with a reliable core firewall in place, ensuring that transactions proceed smoothly."
  • "The user interface could be more user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

We are using the solution for the perimeter. It's used as a core firewall, with almost all transactions passing through the firewall. For instance, in a cellular phone company, all transactional authorizations pass through the firewall, while in a bank, authorizations for branches and ATMs go through the firewall. The main customers are in the BFSI, telcos, industry manufacturing, and other large enterprise sectors.

How has it helped my organization?

Check Point's solutions allow organizations to operate securely with a reliable core firewall in place, ensuring that transactions proceed smoothly.

What is most valuable?

The Check Point firewall is used as a core firewall offering high reliability with at least two synchronized data centers, creating a fault-tolerant configuration. It is considered a very stable platform with minimal bugs.

What needs improvement?

Technically, there is no need for improvement. That said, they need to be more aggressive and protect more of the channels on the commercial side. Additionally, the user interface could be more user-friendly.

Buyer's Guide
Check Point NGFW
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point NGFW. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Check Point solutions for over twenty-five years, since the very beginning.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The firewall is highly stable, being described as one of the most reliable, with a stable platform and few bugs.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Using the Maestro technology, the firewall has good scalability. It allows for flexibility and growth by stacking clippings without needing to change the chassis.

How are customer service and support?

Customer service is generally good. With Diamond or Diamond Plus service for banks, the support level meets customer expectations. The internal team of Check experts also ensures issues are resolved efficiently.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We are familiar with and have supported other solutions like Fortinet, Palo Alto, and Cisco yet primarily do business with Check Point.

How was the initial setup?

Initial setup can be complex, especially in large or redundant deployments. Expertise is required to manage configurations, especially with complex operations and a high volume of users and VPNs.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation team has around 20 people, with a total group including maintenance and support numbering 60.

What was our ROI?

Monetizing the risk is complex, and despite having software for calculating ROI in security, traditional calculations like the FAIR methodology do not apply efficiently in Latin America.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Check Point and Palo Alto solutions are among the more expensive options, but once a platform is adopted, switching is difficult. Clients tend to stay with the same brand for extended periods.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We have evaluated solutions from Fortinet, Palo Alto, and Cisco, however, the main offering is Check Point.

What other advice do I have?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Defense protection study manager at Ministère de la Défense
Real User
Top 5
Reliable platform providing ease of management
Pros and Cons
  • "The interface allows us to quickly adapt to new security requirements and maintain compliance with organizational policies."
  • "The platform's technical support services need enhancement."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use Check Point NGFW for network segmentation and traffic control. It effectively segments our network into zones, allowing us to manage and secure traffic flows between different segments.

What needs improvement?

The platform's technical support services need enhancement. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is highly scalable and crucial for our large-scale deployment needs. Its scalability is a ten out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is generally responsive, although there have been occasional delays in accessing specialized assistance tailored to our needs.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The deployment was handled by dedicated experts within our organization, ensuring a smooth setup. While I didn't oversee the technical aspects directly, our team found the process straightforward, minimizing operational disruptions.

What was our ROI?

The product is on the higher end of the cost spectrum, but the investment is justified by its high-quality performance and reliability, which are paramount for our security infrastructure.

What other advice do I have?

Check Point NGFW has consistently provided stable operation which is critical for our organization's security needs.

Managing firewall rules and policies is intuitive and efficient. The interface allows us to quickly adapt to new security requirements and maintain compliance with organizational policies.

I highly recommend it for organizations seeking robust network security.

Overall, I rate it an eight. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point NGFW
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point NGFW. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Saurabh Lahoti - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at Worldline Global
User
Top 20
Intuitive with a user-friendly management interface and is accessible to non-technical staff
Pros and Cons
  • "Check Point firewalls have significantly improved our ability to detect and prevent threats."
  • "It requires enhanced automation tools for regulatory compliance to ease the burden of compliance reporting and auditing."

What is our primary use case?

The implementation of Check Point firewalls has been a transformative experience for our organization. It has significantly improved our cybersecurity posture, enabling us to detect and prevent threats more effectively, streamline management, and stay agile in the face of evolving security challenges. 

With Check Point, we are not just securing our data, we are also protecting our brand and reputation. The value they bring to our organization is immeasurable, making them an essential component of our overall cybersecurity strategy.

How has it helped my organization?

In today's ever-evolving digital landscape, cybersecurity is paramount for any organization. For our company, the implementation of Check Point firewalls has proven to be a pivotal moment in our ongoing quest to bolster our cybersecurity defenses. These firewalls have not only improved our security measures but have also positively impacted our overall business operations.

In our industry, adhering to stringent compliance regulations is paramount. Check Point firewalls help us ensure compliance with industry-specific regulations and standards, such as HIPAA, GDPR, or PCI DSS. This compliance assurance has eased the audit process and instilled trust among our clients.

What is most valuable?

Check Point firewalls have significantly improved our ability to detect and prevent threats. The robust threat intelligence capabilities, coupled with real-time monitoring, have allowed us to swiftly respond to potential security breaches. As a result, we have experienced a noticeable decrease in security incidents and data breaches, which ultimately translates into cost savings and a bolstered reputation.

As our organization grows, so does the volume of data we need to protect. Check Point firewalls have proved scalable and can handle increased traffic and the addition of new services without compromising performance. This scalability ensures that our security measures are always aligned with our business growth.

One of the standout features of Check Point firewalls is their user-friendly management interface. This intuitive platform has streamlined firewall management, making it accessible to both our in-house IT team and non-technical staff. This has resulted in a more efficient use of resources and time, allowing our IT personnel to focus on other critical tasks.

What needs improvement?

The product needs comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities to help organizations gain insights into their security posture and demonstrate compliance to stakeholders.

It requires enhanced automation tools for regulatory compliance to ease the burden of compliance reporting and auditing.

The solution needs to tighten security by facilitating easy integration with MFA solutions to enhance user authentication.

It needs to integrate automation and orchestration capabilities to streamline incident response and automate routine security tasks, reducing the workload on security teams.

As containerization and microservices become more prevalent, it needs to provide security solutions that protect these modern application architectures effectively. Features like runtime protection and security scanning for containers can be beneficial.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for almost five years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Check Point firewalls are quite robust and resilient.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Check Point firewalls have proved scalable and can handle increased traffic and the addition of new services without compromising performance.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is recommended. I'd give them an A++++.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different solution. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We deployed the solution using Check Point's PS Support. Their team is highly experienced and professional.

What was our ROI?

It's worth the cost.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Initially, the cost of the investment might seem high compared to other vendors. However, in the long run, it might prove to be economical and cost-efficient.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I also evaluated Fortinet and Cisco ASA.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer9814083 - PeerSpot reviewer
Flat Earth Networking, Inc. at Cyber Security Engineer
User
Top 10
Good logging and searchability with useful free trial licenses
Pros and Cons
  • "Being able to search in clear text is simple for the customer and for troubleshooting an environment."
  • "It's too expensive for mid-market companies."

What is our primary use case?

We have multiple customers that use this product.  Integrated logging is the best around.  

It's clear and does the job it's supposed to do.  

We typically install this as the network edges and encourage our customers to have one at each location. Some prefer to backhall the smaller sites to the main branch where it handles all the inspection and rules.  

We also set up multifactor SSL VPN solutions at the main location which allows visibility into remote worker traffic. Overall, it's used mostly by small to medium businesses.

How has it helped my organization?

We have been able to sell this product for a long time as it's highly rated and has a deep feature set. We have probably sold millions of dollars worth of Check Point products over the years.  

When the customer comes to us wanting the most protection we typically suggest Check Point first. Our engineers enjoy being able to quickly deploy a solution and have the familiarity with the product to be able to troubleshoot it quickly once it's deployed. For the most part, we train our customers to be able to manage it themselves.

What is most valuable?

Mostly the logging features of the Check Point NGFW are the most valuable.  Being able to search in clear text is simple for the customer and for troubleshooting an environment. 

I also like that you can get trial licenses for just about every product solution.  This allows us to suggest a feature, implement it, and then show the customer that it has value. We tend to retain the customer on that product for the long term once it has been deployed and they are able to see what it's doing to protect them.

What needs improvement?

The only thing holding it back is the price. It's too expensive for mid-market companies. There are other platforms that have emerged that have a similar feature set, however, are more difficult to deploy. This is really only a problem for the engineers as the customer doesn't care how many hours the engineer has to put in to make it work in their environment. If the Check Point product came in at a lower price point it would make it easier for the customer to see the value in cost, thus making it easier for us to sell.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has been the most stable for a long time.  That track record is something that you can show the customer. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is highly scalable especially if you integrate the orchestration solution. 

How are customer service and support?

Support is hit or miss lately. They have lost too many good reps to other companies. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used other solutions, however, we continue to use Check Point NGFW.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple once you have the appropriate infrastructure setup.  Once Check Point gets away from the central management solution and allows for on-box management it will make small businesses happier. 

What about the implementation team?

I am part of the vendor team. We do a good job implementing it, although sometimes it takes too much time to deploy a product. 

What was our ROI?

We tell the customer that the ROI is the protection they are receiving and the stability of the product.  

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We tell customers truthfully it's the best product, however, it has the highest cost and you'll pay for each license.  

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are always evaluating other solutions for our customers. Palo Alto and Fortigate are the top two others at the moment.

What other advice do I have?

They just need to get the pricing down or do a better job of bundling the licensing.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are a reseller
PeerSpot user
SamirPaul - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Security Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Consultant
Top 10
A robust cybersecurity capabilities with significant upgrade downtime
Pros and Cons
  • "They utilize various gateway features, including Identity as a Service (IDaaS), anti-spam, antivirus, and other security measures, effectively creating a robust defense against a wide range of potential risks."
  • "To enhance the user experience, Check Point should consider adopting an incremental upgrade approach, similar to competitors like Palo Alto or Fortinet, as it would help minimize downtime and streamline the upgrade process, making it more efficient and user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

The customer's use case involves employing it to safeguard their internal applications from external threats. They utilize various gateway features, including user identity-based policy, anti-spam, antivirus, IPS, anti-BOT, and other security measures, effectively creating a robust defense against a wide range of potential risks.

How has it helped my organization?

The primary focus is on safeguarding the customer's internal applications, especially for traders. When it comes to security, the main advantage lies in risk mitigation, akin to insurance.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is its unique inspection model, which was initially a basic firewall inspection. Over time, they've developed and refined this model to cater specifically to trade-related intelligence. It is now a crucial and central component of their security infrastructure.

What needs improvement?

From an administrative perspective regarding Check Point NGFW, there are two key suggestions to improve efficiency. Firstly, administrators should be able to create a unified policy which means that when administrators set up policies in Check Point, they should have the flexibility to configure different security profiles and other security parameters all within the same access policy, simplifying the process. Secondly, the upgrade process for Check Point Firewalls currently involves extended downtime as it often requires a fresh installation. This downtime can last up to around sixty minutes, causing disruptions to business operations. To enhance the user experience, Check Point should consider adopting an incremental upgrade approach, similar to competitors like Palo Alto or Fortinet, as it would help minimize downtime and streamline the upgrade process, making it more efficient and user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with it for about ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It provides good stability features. I would rate it six out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is achievable in the cloud environment. By following the appropriate processes, you can configure automated scanning and other necessary functions to ensure it.

How are customer service and support?

From a technical support perspective, there is room for improvement in Check Point's services. They have increasingly outsourced a significant portion of their support, primarily to third parties. This outsourcing has raised concerns, as it often results in longer resolution times and troubleshooting processes. In my experience, working with Level 3 engineers is more satisfactory and efficient, whereas Level 1 and Level 2 support can sometimes fall short of expectations and extend the time required to address issues.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

When comparing Check Point to Fortinet and Palo Alto solutions, there are several advantages and disadvantages to consider. One key advantage of Check Point is its robust logging capabilities. Administrators can access detailed traffic flow information, providing valuable insights into network activity. Another strength is the trust associated with Check Point. They pioneered the concept of "stateful firewall," which has established a strong foundation for trust in their security solutions and is built on their extensive experience and history in the field.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is a medium-level complexity task.

What about the implementation team?

When deploying on AWS cloud, I typically opt for CloudFormation templates to facilitate the setup of Check Point. This approach offers the advantages of infrastructure as code. When it comes to on-premises deployments, the process is manual and involves tasks such as physical cable connections, configuring interfaces, setting up routes, and defining network policies. For a typical mid-sized project, a single person is usually sufficient for the cloud deployment, taking no more than two hours if the implementation plan is well-defined and the design is in place.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost can vary depending on the specific model and feature set requirements, as well as the unique value it offers to the organization. The price may be perceived as relatively high when compared to the features and capabilities they provide.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for anyone considering it would be to begin by thoroughly understanding their specific needs and requirements. It's crucial to assess budget constraints and security priorities. If an organization has a sufficient budget and prioritizes a robust security posture, I would recommend considering Fortinet. They often provide a more comprehensive security exposure when compared to Check Point. For organizations with legacy systems or a strong preference for Check Point's Endpoint solutions, my advice is to segregate the management and gateway components. Avoid running both on the same platform to prevent complexity and potential issues. Separating these functions can lead to a smoother and more efficient operation. Overall, I would rate it six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Adhi Wahyu - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at RSUP Dr. Sardjito
Real User
Top 10
Excellent antivirus, antibot, and intrusion prevention systems
Pros and Cons
  • "We can manage which users have access to certain websites."
  • "The product could provide an easier user interface and management, by combining all functions (network and policy configuration) into one single application rather than split it into different applications."

What is our primary use case?

We use the NGFW to give security and protection to our local network and internet user from internet threats like viruses, worms, bots, and intrusion. 

We also use it to control the internet URLs accessed by the user. We subscribe to two internet service providers with total bandwidth available of 450 Mbps and we have more than 700 internet users connected. 

Check Point's firewall does a good job of protecting the user from malicious threats. It is able to run smoothly without being a bottleneck in the network. 

How has it helped my organization?

Check Point NGFW helps us to secure our user's computer and our server and therefore helps us to maintain business operations. It has important features like an intrusion prevention system, anti-virus, and anti-bot capabilities. 

It also helps us manage bandwidth efficiently by managing what website is allowed to access by users. 

We're limiting user access to websites with high bandwidth demand like video streaming and social media, of forbidden websites like adult websites. 

We can manage which users have access to certain websites.

What is most valuable?

The antivirus, antibot, and intrusion prevention systems are great. It's very important due to the fact that to prevent is better than to recover. The features play a critical role in preventing any security incidents from happening and minimalizing them before they become bigger problems. 

Its URL filtering feature is great. We can manage which users are allowed access to which websites at a certain time. We can also manage which application is allowed and forbidden for the users. 

Check Point has a vast list of applications it is able to manage - from torrents to games, social media, etc. 

What needs improvement?

The product could provide an easier user interface and management, by combining all functions (network and policy configuration) into one single application rather than splitting it into different applications. 

Users will also really appreciate it if Check Point provides a free management and logfile analysis module. In the existing setup, a user must pay an extra subscription fee to have access to the firewall management module. It makes the user without a subscription unable to fully gain insight from the firewall log file so they are unable to fully utilize the device

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's stable. The system runs with minimal problems. I said minimal because yes there were problems. In 4 years using checkpoint, we have maybe 2 major problem. One was hardware modul failure, that replaced as soon as possible by support team, and the other was software/configuration problem, that get solved also with the help of support team

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It has the ability to scale depending on the product model.

How are customer service and support?

They provide good support, depending on your troubles. For more complicated requests, maybe you will have to pay.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Check Point is the company's first NGFW.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple, however, customizing it could be complex.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution through a vendor team. The score I'd give for their expertise is seven out of ten.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

if you pay for the setup cost, make sure you get it set up exactly as you need it to be.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked into Sophos, Sangfor, and Palo Alto.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Senior Systems Engineer at Upper Occoquan Service Authority
Real User
Provides great protection from threats, comes with good support, and scales very well
Pros and Cons
  • "The console or the single interface on the blades is most valuable."
  • "The only thing that we've seen is instances where console and administrative interfaces get locked up or freeze, and we have to get the machine rebooted."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Firewall Intrusion Prevention and URL Filtering, and we just purchased the Endpoint Protection package for our workstations.

It is deployed on-premises. We have two Check Point systems in place. We have one that's between our business network and the outside world, and we also have one that's between our business network and our internal SCADA system.

We haven't updated to version 81, so we're still at version 80.

How has it helped my organization?

It has provided us with great protection from threats. I've been here 30 years, and we've had two incidents, and none of them were within the time we've used Check Point.

What is most valuable?

The console or the single interface on the blades is most valuable.

What needs improvement?

The only thing that we've seen is instances where console and administrative interfaces get locked up or freeze, and we have to get the machine rebooted.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for probably 10 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate it a nine out of 10 in terms of stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Its scalability is very good. Our entire force is about 190 people, and most of them use it at some point just because they are going out to the internet and have that protection for the workstations. 

It is being used extensively. Everyone is using it, and we do have plans to increase the functionality on the device.

How are customer service and support?

They provide really good support. I would rate them a five out of five. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I can't remember the product, but what we had initially was an entry-level device. It was a single-purpose firewall. We went up to an enterprise solution that had additional features.

How was the initial setup?

It was pretty simple to transfer the old firewall configuration to the new one. So, it was pretty straightforward and easy. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of effortlessness.

It took over a month. We ran two systems. We built a new system for a couple of weeks before switching over completely.

What about the implementation team?

We used a consultant. Our experience with them was very good.

For deployment and maintenance, we have five people on our staff. We have to do some maintenance on it. It's pretty much scheduled to rotate between us so that we keep our skills fresh.

What was our ROI?

We've not done an initial study on any kind of ROI. We rarely do. In positives, we try to perform a yearly risk assessment of our systems, and we find very few vulnerabilities. So, it is doing what it's supposed to. It is keeping us safe.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Its cost is a little higher than other products.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other options, but I don't remember their names. We basically went to the consultant we deal with for security-related things and said, "What's out there? What do you recommend?" He gave us three and recommended that the Check Point was probably the lead one.

What other advice do I have?

I would advise comparing it to the other products.

I would rate it a nine out of 10. It has served us very well and given us very few headaches.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1717920 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Consultant at Capgemini
Real User
Easy to scale with good IPS features and helpful technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "If there is a critical issue observed, the Check Point support team can create a custom package that we can deploy on the gateway to mitigate critical issues/bug fixes."
  • "Sometimes we need to find a resolution by ourselves as the solution's knowledge base is not enough."

What is our primary use case?

We are using this product as a firewall which does have the capacity to block the IPS signature as well. 

It is highly accurate for the IPS engine and has the best-in-class log monitoring and report generating facility in the firewall. 

It is easy to manage, as it has a centralized management console. We are using the firewall as a VPN service as well. It is very easy to troubleshoot the issue with the VPN. We are using IPSEC features where we can enable tunnels with the client and we can safely communicate with vendors due to encryption.

How has it helped my organization?

Checkpoint NGFW improved the security posture of our network infrastructure to the point where we can use antivirus, IPS, and antibot features to tighten up the security. We can also use URL filtering where we can block malicious URLs in communications. We can easily stop and detect Day-Zero attacks. 

The throughput of the firewall is very big for data transitions. The antivirus also includes DPI (deep packet inspection), which examines the data within the packet itself rather than only looking at packet headers. This enables users to identify, categorize, or block packets with malicious data more effectively. 

What is most valuable?

The IPS feature is the most valuable feature. We can block zero-day attacks within stipulated time intervals. The up-gradation activities are much simpler when we are dealing with Check Point firewalls. 

If there is a critical issue observed, the Check Point support team can create a custom package that we can deploy on the gateway to mitigate critical issues/bug fixes. 

The support reachability is very promising, as we can directly connect with them via call or chat from the support portal.

What needs improvement?

Sometimes the KB article does not include all the steps. There is a chance for improvement in the content of global KB articles. It's nearly impossible to add an exception for threat prevention services - such as antivirus and anti-bot. You will be stuck with Indicators of compromise marked as detecting only, caching issues, and random effects. There is no clear way to report incorrect classification to support. 

Sometimes we need to find a resolution by ourselves as the solution's knowledge base is not enough.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We can easily scale the gateways with a few simple clicks. 

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is great.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did use a different solution. Check Point provides better visibility where security is concerned. 

How was the initial setup?

The setup was very straightforward

What about the implementation team?

We can implement it by ourselves.

What was our ROI?

The ROI is double annually.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is pretty cheap as far as the setup cost, pricing, and/or licensing are concerned.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We looked at Palo Alto firewalls.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point NGFW Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point NGFW Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.