Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point NGFW based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and OPNsense.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Check Point NGFW surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat prevention, seamless integration with cloud environments, and a user-friendly management interface, ensuring comprehensive security and efficiency for enterprises of all sizes.
Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Fortinet FortiGate is praised for its cost-effective, high-performance threat protection and ease of use. In comparison, Check Point NGFW is valued for advanced threat prevention and scalability. FortiGate excels in user-friendly deployment, while Check Point's robust features justify its higher cost.
Netgate pfSense attracts with cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, appealing to those needing budget-friendly solutions. In comparison, Check Point NGFW offers advanced security features and extensive support resources, making it ideal for organizations requiring comprehensive threat prevention and threat intelligence despite higher costs.
Netgate pfSense has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point NGFW, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Check Point NGFW offers more comprehensive initial setup features, justifying its higher setup cost.
Netgate pfSense has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point NGFW, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Check Point NGFW offers more comprehensive initial setup features, justifying its higher setup cost.
OPNsense appeals to cost-conscious buyers with customizable firewall policies and open-source benefits. In comparison, Check Point NGFW is chosen for advanced threat prevention and integrated security management. Check Point NGFW offers dedicated support and professional setup, while OPNsense provides ease for experienced users.
OPNsense has a lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point NGFW, which requires a higher investment. OPNsense is typically more affordable, whereas users find Check Point NGFW pricier.
OPNsense has a lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point NGFW, which requires a higher investment. OPNsense is typically more affordable, whereas users find Check Point NGFW pricier.
Cisco Secure Firewall offers robust advanced threat detection and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Check Point NGFW excels in comprehensive security management and extensive threat prevention. Cisco is favored for cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, while Check Point is valued for long-term ROI and detailed customer service.
The setup cost for Cisco Secure Firewall is generally reported as higher due to its comprehensive features, while Check Point NGFW offers a more cost-effective setup option, often appealing to budget-conscious users.
The setup cost for Cisco Secure Firewall is generally reported as higher due to its comprehensive features, while Check Point NGFW offers a more cost-effective setup option, often appealing to budget-conscious users.
Sophos XG offers competitive pricing and supportive customer service. In comparison, Check Point NGFW excels with its comprehensive threat prevention and granular policy controls. Sophos XG is favored for ease of deployment, while Check Point NGFW provides robust advanced security features and solid ROI.
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost than Check Point NGFW, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Check Point NGFW, despite being higher in setup cost, offers advanced capabilities that might justify the investment.
Sophos XG has a lower setup cost than Check Point NGFW, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Check Point NGFW, despite being higher in setup cost, offers advanced capabilities that might justify the investment.
Check Point NGFW and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are advanced network security solutions. Check Point NGFW is appreciated for its pricing and support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, though more costly, offer superior features, making them worth the investment due to enhanced security functionalities.
Check Point NGFW is praised for its reasonable setup costs, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted to be more expensive to set up but offer extensive features.
Check Point NGFW is praised for its reasonable setup costs, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted to be more expensive to set up but offer extensive features.
Check Point NGFW offers robust security features like advanced threat prevention and centralized management, making it ideal for organizations seeking detailed reporting and strong support. In comparison, Azure Firewall excels in seamless Azure service integration and scalability, benefiting tech buyers needing scalable solutions with flexible pricing.
Check Point NGFW has a higher setup cost than Azure Firewall, where the initial investment is significantly lower. Check Point's detailed setup process contrasts with Azure's more streamlined approach.
Check Point NGFW has a higher setup cost than Azure Firewall, where the initial investment is significantly lower. Check Point's detailed setup process contrasts with Azure's more streamlined approach.
WatchGuard Firebox is known for competitive pricing and reliable support, making it a cost-effective choice for buyers seeking ease of deployment and affordability. In comparison, Check Point NGFW offers advanced features and performance, appealing to those who prioritize sophisticated threat prevention and comprehensive security management.
SonicWall TZ appeals to users with its pricing and support. In comparison, Check Point NGFW stands out for its extensive features. SonicWall TZ offers efficient bandwidth management. Check Point NGFW excels in advanced threat detection. SonicWall TZ provides straightforward deployment. Check Point NGFW ensures deployment flexibility.
Juniper SRX Series Firewall excels in quick deployment and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Check Point NGFW offers advanced features and robust support. Juniper suits those seeking efficient setup and affordability, while Check Point appeals to buyers needing comprehensive features and detailed configuration.
Juniper SRX Series Firewall users report lower setup costs, while Check Point NGFW is noted for its higher initial expense. The key difference lies in the upfront investment required for each product.
Juniper SRX Series Firewall users report lower setup costs, while Check Point NGFW is noted for its higher initial expense. The key difference lies in the upfront investment required for each product.
Untangle NG Firewall excels with user-friendly deployment, affordable pricing, and great customer support. In comparison, Check Point NGFW offers advanced security features and granular policy management, requiring a higher initial investment but providing substantial ROI in critical environments. Check Point's complexity contrasts with Untangle's simplicity.
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point NGFW. Check Point NGFW offers more advanced features at a higher initial investment.
Untangle NG Firewall has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point NGFW. Check Point NGFW offers more advanced features at a higher initial investment.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is favored for its competitive pricing and straightforward deployment, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Check Point NGFW is recognized for its advanced features and extensive support, appealing to those seeking comprehensive security capabilities despite higher costs.
The setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is typically lower, making it more accessible for smaller budgets, whereas Check Point NGFW often comes with higher initial costs, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
The setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is typically lower, making it more accessible for smaller budgets, whereas Check Point NGFW often comes with higher initial costs, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
SonicWall NSa appeals to buyers seeking cost-effective pricing and robust support, excelling in ease of deployment and management. In comparison, Check Point NGFW offers more advanced security features and superior performance, justifying its higher cost for those prioritizing comprehensive protection and detailed analytics.
SonicWall NSa has a higher setup cost while Check Point NGFW is comparatively more affordable. Customers often cite the SonicWall NSa's extensive configuration options, whereas Check Point NGFW is praised for its budget-friendly initial deployment costs.
SonicWall NSa has a higher setup cost while Check Point NGFW is comparatively more affordable. Customers often cite the SonicWall NSa's extensive configuration options, whereas Check Point NGFW is praised for its budget-friendly initial deployment costs.
Check Point NGFW offers robust support and competitive pricing with strong threat protection and efficient policy management. In comparison, Sophos XGS is noted for advanced features, exceptional cloud service integration, superior application control, and sophisticated functionality, making it a compelling choice despite its higher cost.
KerioControl attracts tech buyers with straightforward configuration and efficient bandwidth management. In comparison, Check Point NGFW offers robust threat prevention and advanced application control. KerioControl's lower setup costs appeal to budget-conscious buyers, whereas Check Point NGFW justifies its higher price with enhanced security features.
Check Point NGFW offers comprehensive security features with robust performance and extensive documentation, appealing to buyers needing advanced threat prevention. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF is user-friendly with innovative threat detection, appealing to those favoring ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness.
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is appreciated for its automatic threat detection and user-friendly management. In comparison, Check Point NGFW delivers comprehensive security and robust threat prevention. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers straightforward deployment and strong customer service, whereas Check Point NGFW provides substantial ROI through advanced features despite higher costs.
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has a higher setup cost while Check Point NGFW offers more affordable initial setup. The differences highlight budget considerations for potential users.
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series has a higher setup cost while Check Point NGFW offers more affordable initial setup. The differences highlight budget considerations for potential users.
Forcepoint is valued for ease of deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Check Point NGFW offers advanced features and high-level security. Forcepoint’s intuitive threat prevention is attractive, while Check Point's integrated security features make it suitable for higher-security environments.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has high setup costs, while Check Point NGFW's setup costs are more affordable. Forcepoint's initial investment might be prohibitive for small businesses, whereas Check Point offers a more budget-friendly option.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has high setup costs, while Check Point NGFW's setup costs are more affordable. Forcepoint's initial investment might be prohibitive for small businesses, whereas Check Point offers a more budget-friendly option.
Check Point NGFW excels in advanced security features and seamless integration. In comparison, Huawei NGFW is known for its cost-effective hardware and efficient threat detection. Check Point offers user-friendly deployment and reliable support, while Huawei is appreciated for its affordability and reasonable ROI.
Check Point NGFW's setup cost is often viewed as higher compared to Huawei NGFW, yet users appreciate its premium features. Huawei NGFW is praised for more budget-friendly setup costs, appealing to cost-conscious users.
Check Point NGFW's setup cost is often viewed as higher compared to Huawei NGFW, yet users appreciate its premium features. Huawei NGFW is praised for more budget-friendly setup costs, appealing to cost-conscious users.
Check Point NGFW excels in threat prevention and robust network protection. In comparison, Zscaler Cloud Firewall offers cloud-native architecture ideal for remote and branch offices. Check Point focuses on network security, while Zscaler emphasizes cloud capabilities for flexible and scalable security solutions.
