Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cyber Security Manager at H2O Power Limited Partnership
Real User
Scalable with a unified platform and good integration
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution has been solid for me for over five years."
  • "The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table."

What is our primary use case?

In our environment, we have many users working remotely. It's important to control the flow of traffic coming and going to these remote employees, and isolate traffic when used for business purposes. We have to allow our remote users to access services from home as though they were in the office. However, at the same time, we need to control that traffic and make sure it conforms to our policy. Our environment is complex and requires advanced policies to look at traffic in very unique ways from different users. Check Point's policy management has allowed us to do that.

How has it helped my organization?

At the beginning of the pandemic, everyone rushed to get their employees working from home. Luckily for us, we already had a strong structure around how remote access would work and had it set up for many employees. 

With the groundwork in place, the transition to remote work was made easy by simply adjusting the policy (configuration). In part, this is because we were already prepared for a remote workforce, and that preparation came from within our organization, however, if it weren't for Check Point enabling us to adjust rapidly, then it would not have been an easy transition.

What is most valuable?

The unified platform view is great. Being able to manage NGFW alongside our Remote Access Policies allows us to control traffic in one way. Be it if our users are at home or in the office the same policy applies to them allowing us to have one corporate view on the traffic within our organization.

Being able to integrate the policy with things like Active Directory groups, Azure cloud objects, RADIUS integration, and load balancing capabilities is wonderful. All of these things are built into their NGFW policy which we leverage to implement on our Remote Access policy.

What needs improvement?

The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table. Right now, in order to allow the same policy to apply, the users' traffic must be routed up to our NGFW before going out to the internet. Having a method to apply the same policy to the client for outbound traffic while connected to the VPN would be huge.

Some things like the compliance aspect of the VPN Client can be updated to bring it a little more modern. It's very useful for checking things like Windows Updates levels before connecting, however, it could use a facelift since it's still quite old-looking.

Buyer's Guide
Check Point Remote Access VPN
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Remote Access VPN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been managing Check Point's Remote Access VPN for five years at my current employment, and had used it before at a previous employer.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution has been solid for me for over five years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I get the impression this could scale up to whatever you need. Scaling issues might only be moving to clustered resources and setting up load balancing on gateways. Once you get big enough you should be able to scale up to your needs.

How are customer service and support?

Support has been great 98% of the time. There's always one bad experience, yet, overall I wouldn't rate them based on that. If they need to get their experts online to help solve a problem, they have plenty and are willing to work through really deep subjects. I never worry with their support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

At our organization, we did not use another solution before this. That said, I have used other products in the past. It's been many years, so I'm sure those other vendors have had time to update their products too, however, since I've been managing Remote Access with Check Point, I've always been really impressed.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up the VPN Clients is simple once you've already got the gateway in place. If you have to setup the Gateway, it will take a bit of knowledge and expertise.

What about the implementation team?

Our in-house team set it up. That said, I have been working with network devices for a long time.

What was our ROI?

ROI on the VPN User license itself returns within a couple of months of you using it. However, if you have to make the investment into buying gateways for the product, then the ROI could be one year (if your whole organization is working from home), or up to three years if you barely use it.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You need to be an NGFW customer already. Otherwise, you'll need to purchase the gateways in order to terminate the VPN. That much should be obvious to anyone. Once you have the gateway in place, there is a VPN User license you need to purchase, however, it is very minimal in cost compared to other infrastructure.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We inherited the Check Point when we took over. Then, when the topic of remote access came up, it made sense to use what we had and just buy additional licensing rather than buy a whole new product.

What other advice do I have?

Check Point products are typically not cheap, however, I've found it's often due to the fact that you can do a lot with it. 

I recommend Check Point products to anyone who is going to have the time and expertise to administer them. You're going to be able to do what you want to do, engineer a design that works for you. If you want to just plug it in and forget about it, then this might not be the product for you. That said, for those who do just want to plug something in and forget about it, I warn you to be cautious. When it comes to Remote Access, you don't want to ignore this. You want to be looking at it and you want to monitor it, otherwise attackers will take advantage of that weakness. This is where Check Point allows you to monitor the edge, while granularly controlling it.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Founder at Isecurex
Real User
Top 20
Seamless connectivity through advanced application access and excellent support
Pros and Cons
  • "The complexity is hidden within a full mesh network, allowing seamless user-to-application connectivity with minimal delay."
  • "Automations for cloud integrations need to be expanded, and currently, developers have to manually configure APIs, which is not developer-centric."

What is our primary use case?

I use Remote Access VPN for clientless applications, setting up WireGuard tunnels, and WireGuard VPN as a service. It provides remote access for SIP setups, allowing users to connect securely through a VPN.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features include application access, clientless application access, and WireGuard. These features make it easy to deploy and offer a user-friendly interface. The complexity is hidden within a full mesh network, allowing seamless user-to-application connectivity with minimal delay.

What needs improvement?

Automations for cloud integrations need to be expanded, and currently, developers have to manually configure APIs, which is not developer-centric. Improving this process could enhance the solution's scalability and efficiency.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used Check Point Remote Access VPN for two and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Some connectivity issues arise occasionally, especially when accessing the internet or using other applications. The installed client sometimes reconnects, possibly due to conflicts with existing VPN solutions.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is extremely scalable, with an eight out of ten rating due to its mesh network and ability to build WireGuard tunnels. However, additional automation is required to enhance its enterprise features.

How are customer service and support?

Customer service is excellent. Support is integrated into the product, making it easy to access without needing to search for contact information. There is an icon in the portal for online support, and Check Point local support promptly replies to queries.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the initial setup of Check Point Remote Access VPN as ten because it is super easy to set up.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is rated eight to 8.5 out of ten. The costs increase with the purchase of advanced features. Licensing issues need to be sorted as different features require separate licenses.

What other advice do I have?

The best solution for small to medium businesses. Licensing issues need to be sorted out. For example, features like CASB and browser security should be bundled. Having automations will help scale to other scenarios.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: consultant
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Remote Access VPN
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Remote Access VPN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Jonathan Ramos G. - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Engineer at ITQS
Real User
Good security, protects identity, and allows full access even in different regions
Pros and Cons
  • "The VPN hides your IP address and encrypts your online traffic and it essentially ensures that your fingerprints cannot be traced on the Internet."
  • "The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."

What is our primary use case?

Remote Access VPN (Remote Access VPN) allows users in our organization to connect to a private network to access services and resources remotely. This connection is secure and is made through the Internet. It came to support us so that users, whenever they were outside the organization and were supporting customers from any region, could have secure access to the corporation's data. 

Another important point is when our executives travel to regions where certain access to services is blocked. The VPN helps us bypass that block. Since a VPN can hide your real IP address, it can help you bypass geo-blocks, as the platform the one you want to access will think it is from the “correct” geographic region.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution is giving us security when it comes to sharing our data safely through the private and secure tunnel that is created when creating the VPN. The VPN hides your IP address and encrypts your online traffic and it essentially ensures that your fingerprints cannot be traced on the Internet. Online hackers won't be able to use your real IP address to discover your personal data, and government surveillance agencies and ISPs won't be able to monitor what you do online by snooping on your traffic.

In addition to helping you avoid government surveillance, it also helps keep your privacy safe from advertisers.

What is most valuable?

In terms of the way they ensure traffic, an example is when we use Wi-Fi in public areas.

WiFi is everywhere nowadays and it is extremely convenient to use, especially if you have a tight mobile data plan. The only problem with free WiFi is that it's often unsecured, which means you're putting your personal data at risk every time you use it. After all, cybercriminals can find out a lot about you, which can lead to them stealing your:

  • Credit card details
  • Bank account details
  • Email login credentials

However, if you use a VPN, you won't have to worry about those dangers. A VPN uses encryption to protect your online communications, making sure no one can monitor it. Basically, if a hacker tried to see your connection traffic, they would just see nonsense.

What needs improvement?

That the level of Remote access VPN was higher by default as other brands do it that way. In the case of Check Point, they are not like that. The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately. From my perspective, it should be added to the same cost as the general license, and that well explained makes the product more attractive. Many organizations would have this need, as many are moving off-premise. We have great executives and entire corporate teams that perform work tasks from home.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for about 2 years.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Especialista Certificado en Administración de Servicios de Tecnología de la Información at AZZAIT
User
A flexible gateway with good security and helpful technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
  • "In the case of URL translation of the VPN Web portal, the requests made from the front end to the back end weren't valid (due to the use of dynamic subdomains). In the case of host translations, the request was made to the same host, however, we cannot specify the ports, which, in our case, are used to redirect to different servers."

What is our primary use case?

Since SARS-COV2, most users went to work from their home office, so we needed to have an robust, secure, and stable VPN connection. We implemented Check Point VPN and we have had no problems with it. We are almost 50 users working from home securely. Also, the access rules based on VLANs have helped many users get access depending on which connection they have. For example, some users with VPN connections can only access some specific servers and ports, however, when they are on an internal LAN, they have access to the entire network.

How has it helped my organization?

We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway. 

I'm the IT manager for the company, and my work has been improved due to the fact that, in conjunction with VPN, we implemented the Endpoint Security client so we can manage our client's computers even if they are not physically in the office. When we need to remove some users from a VPN connection we just need to lock the account and use the assets console to disable the feature from the client's computer.

What is most valuable?

The combination of the user accounts for the VPN with the access rules provided by the security gateway gives you more control and specificity about who has access to what. For external users, we can offer a solution based on the internet needs and we are able to share information on a secure channel. We can specifically point to the desired resources in the organization without the need to install any additional software on external client machines.

What needs improvement?

It needs to improve the capability of the Secure browser VPN connections. Some in-house applications didn't work due to the use of JScript and the backend and front end technology for the applications. In the case of URL translation of the VPN Web portal, the requests made from the front end to the back end weren't valid (due to the use of dynamic subdomains). In the case of host translations, the request was made to the same host, however, we cannot specify the ports, which, in our case, are used to redirect to different servers.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for over two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's very stable, however, I recommend some scheduled restarts for cleaning connections and processes.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is very easy to manage the solution and also the integration.

How are customer service and support?

I have had a good experience with the support tickets that I have dealt with.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previous to Check Point, we didn't have any gateway security.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was a little complex as it was the first time working with Check Point.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation was handled by an in-house team.

What was our ROI?

We expect that investments is recovered in two years.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is fair and the support team is good.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We were evaluating Fortinet as well.

What other advice do I have?

Check Point is very reliable and secure.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1602519 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Vice President, Technology for the Americas at Engel & Völkers Development GmbH
Real User
Great scalability, good technical support, and integrates extremely well with the Check Point firewall
Pros and Cons
  • "The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware."
  • "For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent."

What is our primary use case?

We use Check Point Remote Access VPN to provide access to employees, vendors, and advisors. They access the company resources - especially now that most people are working from home over the course of the last year. We also use it for specific companies that give us remote support to some applications, such as our parent company. Our admins access our company servers and resources. We're using Remote Access VPN with specific profiles for them that only give access to some resources.

We have three distinct environments. Server, DMZ, and User/SHOP. The firewall connects to the internet and those firewalls are the ones that the people connect to for the Remote VPN. We have the Blade enabled and they access the company resources as if they were working at the office.

How has it helped my organization?

The headache of connecting has been removed. It's very stable and we don't have any issues with it connecting. We have a large majority of people that were using nothing and always coming to the office. However, since the last year, we have a whopping 75% of users that have switched to using Check Point Remote Access VPN. The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage.

What is most valuable?

The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage. 

The integration with two-factor authentication for remote access users is another valuable feature. In our case we use RSA.

Those two are the most valuable aspects that we have on the solution. It also gives us the possibility to securely connect to the company resources, without Check Point security measures.

Another great thing is that we already have all the logs from the firewall on the SmartPortal as the remote VPN also integrates into the firewall. We can see all the logs on the same tool because we also have a fully secure solution for Remote Access VPN. For full operational security, we need to manage the different hardware from the firewalls and the logs that are not in the same place. This is another valuable aspect of this solution.

Having access to those logs affects our security operations because if a user calls the support but does not have access to the VPN, we can see on the same tool on the SmartPortal and troublshoot. 

What needs improvement?

We don't have any specific complaints. We are very happy with the Windows client. You log in with the VPN for the full client, you do the log in right from the software itself. For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent. The documentation of the software needs to be more accessible. If an end-user wants to have access to customized training from the company, that should be able to be built-in. I would add that feature. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for around 1.5 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good. It's a never-fail.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is great. We deploy to 5000+ users.

How are customer service and technical support?

It's second to none but we haven't needed it a lot. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used to use Fortinet. We switched because it was hard to deploy. 

How was the initial setup?

Just pull the trigger on a 3rd party. Not complex at all. 

What about the implementation team?

We used both a vendor and in-house talent. 

What was our ROI?

The ROI was instant and around 54%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Go with a third party and get it set up correctly. It may be costly but it's worth it. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We didn't evaluate anything else. I knew a vendor and had used the software before. 

What other advice do I have?

Get this software installed as soon as possible. It's a smart move. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Suraj Varma - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
Real User
Top 5
Good support, easy connection, and helpful multi-factor authentication
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable point is that it provides multi-factor authentication (MFA), which increases security by requiring an add-on verification method and ensures that only authorized users have access to the network."
  • "The knowledge base can be improved for advanced troubleshooting."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is to provide a remote access VPN to organization users so that they can access the organization servers or resources easily from anywhere.

How has it helped my organization?

With the help of Remote Access VPN, our organization's users can connect to our network easily and access servers. This has increased employee productivity.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable point is that it provides multi-factor authentication (MFA), which increases security by requiring an add-on verification method and ensures that only authorized users have access to the network.

What needs improvement?

The knowledge base can be improved for advanced troubleshooting. For new users, configurations might be complex. This can be also improved. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for the last year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is excellent.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is very good.

How are customer service and support?

Our experience with customer service and support is excellent.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We are using the same solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very easy and straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it through an in-house team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

As per the market, everything looks good.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No, we haven't evaluated other option

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Irshad Kazi - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Technical Consultant at ITC Infotech
MSP
Top 5Leaderboard
Provides ease of maintenance, but its installation process needs improvement
Pros and Cons
    • "We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use Check Point Remote Access VPN for security features.

    What needs improvement?

    We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products. It is difficult to restore settings in cases of connection failure. This particular area needs improvement.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The product is stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We have 3000 Check Point Remote Access VPNs in our organization. It is a scalable product. We can increase and downgrade the access as much as possible. The usage depends on the licensing model.

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support team only responds to the problems where the device stops working. Apart from that, they don’t reply to normal issues.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We used ForcePoint before. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and easy to connect.

    How was the initial setup?

    The product is easy to maintain. It takes a few days to install and troubleshoot.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The product has average pricing. We purchase its yearly pricing.

    What other advice do I have?

    I advise others to use the product instead of multiple SD solutions and hardware products. I rate Check Point Remote Access VPN a seven out of ten.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    PeerSpot user
    reviewer2244411 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Security Architect/Staff Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Provides strong security features and offers a straightforward setup
    Pros and Cons
    • "Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management."
    • "Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."

    What is most valuable?

    Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management. These ensure data protection and access control for remote users, making it a reliable solution for maintaining security in remote access scenarios.

    What needs improvement?

    Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience, bringing it closer to the level of Cisco AnyConnect, which is considered more user-friendly.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for almost four years.

    How are customer service and support?

    My experience with tech support for Check Point Remote Access VPN was okay, but I find Cisco's support to be better. Overall, I would rate Check Point's support around six out of ten.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    How was the initial setup?

    Installation of Check Point Remote Access VPN is straightforward and it involves agent deployment to user laptops, enabling easy connectivity. Maintenance is low-cost and manageable, even for small teams, as configurations are straightforward. Network security engineers need to specify network segments for traffic segregation, but overall, deployment is automated, minimizing manual intervention and complexity.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing for Check Point Remote Access VPN is average. Firewalls, whether physical or cloud-based, tend to be expensive, and Check Point's offering is no exception. While cloud options may offer more flexibility, physical devices have significant licensing costs, often totaling thousands of dollars.

    What other advice do I have?

    Remote Access VPN, like Check Point's solution, is user-friendly, requiring only client installation for connectivity. It is useful for employees accessing corporate networks remotely and for granting controlled access to contractors or vendors. Competitors like Cisco's AnyConnect exist but Check Point Remote Access VPN is highly regarded for its functionality and reliability.

    Check Point's Remote Access VPN is user-friendly and efficient for connecting via laptops, offering a straightforward setup without complex configurations. It simplifies access to specific divisions within a corporate network, making it suitable for end-users without extensive security knowledge. Although challenges may arise with mobile connectivity, the overall experience is smooth and accessible.

    MFA adds an extra layer of security to Remote Access VPN. For example, users might need to enter a code from an authenticator app on their phone in addition to their regular login credentials. This ensures enhanced verification of user identity and helps protect against unauthorized access.

    Overall, I would rate Check Point Remote Access VPN as an eight out of ten.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Check Point Remote Access VPN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: April 2025
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Check Point Remote Access VPN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.