Check Point Remote Access VPN Reviews

We use Remote Access VPN as a secondary VPN for our IT admins. We use this solution on a different production Internet line. If there is a network shortage on our primary line, we can use Check Point to access and check the systems.

We use the solution in a basic configuration. The ease of use and the user interface for troubleshooting issues have been helpful.

We need to use two-factor authentication, ADA authentication, and ADA integration. These features are important. We also use a different kind of cPanel and try to differentiate between the IVR accessing the account and the traffic we will send to our system through Check Point values when installed.

The solution is easy for administrators because you can check logs and write rules on the same page.

The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for two to three years.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

The scalability depends on the gateway and deployment. A stronger gateway can support more users. The cluster configuration also affects scalability. For example, two active gateways can be used for the VPN. We have 100-200 users using this solution since we use it for IT personnel. We are in progress and we are trying to change our primary ETM product. It will go to Check Point for a POC on a larger scale. I rate the solution’s scalability a four or five out of ten.

If you are using Check Point support, they usually assign someone from level 1 to level 2. It is a struggle to struggle to get Level 3 or more if there is a problem that needs to be solved ASAP. The support response could be faster.

Since we had a Check Point firewall, we used the Check Point VPN for a specific line.

The deployment takes around two to three hours. If you manage the product, one person could be enough, but if you need some kind of additional integrations like ADA integration, you need someone from ADT to access products. One person is enough, but one or two additional personnel may be included. To deploy Check Point Remote Access VPN, you must purchase a license, enable the blade, and purchase client access licenses. You can then follow the instructions to deploy the product, write the necessary rules, make the integrations, deploy the agent to the clients, and provide them with a login solution. I rate the initial setup an eight on a scale of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

The product is priced between 20,000 and 40,000. We purchased the license two years ago. I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where ten is expensive.

If you work with Check Point in your native areas, there may be some problems. Check Point has always been a first in this area but is struggling to improve its product. While they are making improvements, the product’s stability is decreasing. Therefore, users should be aware of potential solution delays if they experience problems. If you create the environment without overuse, users will not experience any problems. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

The most valuable feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is its ability to deploy. It follows the same process as their stateful inspection firewall or IPS. If you know how to enable one feature, you can enable and configure others. The learning curve isn't steep.

The product needs to improve its support. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN is quite stable. Once we trained our staff on using and troubleshooting the solution, we could quickly hand it over.

The tool is scalable. If you size your appliance correctly, you shouldn't have software issues. It is deployed with head-end gateways in three regions. From the endpoint perspective, it supports about 1000 end users globally. These users have SMB devices shipped to them that build VPN connections to our head-end devices in the data centers.

This VPN solution integrates with SMB devices. We ship these devices to our end users, who just need to plug them into their network. Once the device receives an IP address, it connects with our head-end and provides connectivity.

A special team helps design solutions, but I can't remember what they're called. It's not the regular break-fix support, which can be frustrating.

The solution's deployment is straightforward. We needed less staff than with other products. Two people were involved in certification, one in verification, and three in deployment (one for build services, one for service delivery, and one for rotation for additional help).

Regarding pricing, as a global customer, we get a big discount. For us, it's a good return on investment. We need to pay for additional features we want to enable. It seems cheaper than other vendors, but I can't say what it would cost an average customer.

During COVID-19, we needed a VPN solution for a specific team that had to use special equipment in the office. We couldn't install this equipment on laptops for home use. The tool helped us deploy a VPN solution in less than 30 days, including project costs and gathering facts. Their support was amazing, especially the R&D team. We worked with someone with experience with similar solutions for other clients, which made it easier. The VPN is still being used, and it's robust.

We mainly implemented the Check Point Remote Access VPN to support our team during the COVID-19 peak. Some employees needed specific equipment that couldn't be installed on laptops at home. The solution allowed us to set up a similar setup to the office for these users so that they could support our clients during COVID-19.

My advice for those considering Check Point Remote Access VPN is that if you're familiar with one solution, the deployment and configuration process is identical for others. There's no learning curve. Just understand your use cases, enable the needed features, and you're ready.

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect. They are in our cloud and our premise data center. 

The scalability needs improvement.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years. 

The solution is not very scalable. 

The initial setup is not very straightforward. I would rate the setup a four out of ten. The solution is easy to maintain. 

The solution is pretty expensive. I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Overall, I will rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

Right now, my company connects with the vendors of Check Point whenever any maintenance is required, and not to our domain.

Check Point Remote Access VPN is a highly secured product with which, in our company, we can get end-to-end VPN connectivity so that the communication part is highly secured.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's connectivity and establishment takes time and needs to be faster.

In the future, Check Point Remote Access VPN should provide its users with URL filtering.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for ten years. My company is a customer and end-user of Check Point.

Though the solution is stable, sometimes the latest updates are not available, especially considering that it is something that has to be done very frequently to take care of URL filtering and the latest OWASP threats, which is only possible if the latest configuration is available to users.

It is a scalable solution.

Considering that access to the solution is given to specific people only in my company, I can say that around 100 to 150 people use the solution.

The technical support team of the solution is very good. My company hasn't faced any issues with the technical support team of the solution. My company has not had to wait for a response from the technical support team. I rate the technical support team of the solution a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with Cisco. Though Cisco is one of the latest products that we deal with right now, my company has been more friendly with Check Point. My company prefers Check Point since it is easy and more user-friendly for us. Cisco is not that much of a user-friendly product since it requires highly skilled people and more engineers to operate it.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process is easy.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process can be done in two hours with the help of a person who takes care of the configuration part while also taking care of the respective routing configurations that are required.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process is something that my company can manage with the help of our in-house members.

Compared to Cisco, Check Point Remote Access VPN is cheaper. My company makes yearly payments only towards the licensing costs attached to Check Point Remote Access VPN, as there are no extra costs attached to the product.

The maintenance part of the solution is easy and can be done remotely, because of which we face no issues in our company.

For 100 to 150 users, Check Point Remote Access VPN is a good option, but later on, if more people are going to get involved, causing one to invest in more frequent VPN connections while wanting secured connections, then Cisco is a better choice. For a limited set of people, Check Point is a better option.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

The main purpose of Check Point Remote Access VPN is to enable employees to securely connect to the corporate network when they work remotely, such as from home.

Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward. However, there are numerous issues, particularly with the SSL connection, including bugs and other problems. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access. While there is a feature called "Map multiple entry point," it is reported to be buggy and inadequate. This forces users to purchase additional licenses for separate central point management to achieve VPN access for different locations. Ideally, Check Point should enhance its system to allow for multiple VPN entries managed from a single server without additional licenses or workaround solutions.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for three to four years.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten because we had some problems before, but we resolved them.

The solution is scalable. It is suitable for small and medium businesses.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The documentation and support available for Check Point Remote Access VPN are pretty good. A smaller or medium-sized company don't communicate directly with Check Point. They can't open tickets with them directly, which is frustrating. Currently, we have to go through partners who sell us the product to open tickets, and there should be an option to communicate directly with Check Point. Opening tickets directly with the vendor would streamline the process and potentially reduce response times.

Positive

Optimization can be a bit more involved with Check Point. Initially, you'll need to perform optimization steps during the configuration process to achieve your desired outcome. Cisco's solution tends to be more straightforward from the outset, providing a robust VPN solution without requiring as much post-configuration tweaking. While Check Point is relatively easy to configure initially, you may deduce more time to optimization tasks afterward. However, once correctly configured and optimized, it functions effectively.

It's easy to configure Check Point Remote Access VPN but It might not be suitable for certain configurations.

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

All the firewall solutions are expensive. Compared with the other vendors, Check Point's pricing is moderate.

Like many IT solutions, equipment such as firewalls can be expensive, but Check Point's pricing is competitive compared to other vendors. Currently, Check Point may even be slightly cheaper than Palo Alto.

I recommend Check Point as a firewall solution due to its effectiveness and reliability. For VPN, I might lean towards Cisco because it tends to have fewer optimization issues and other potential complications with VPN deployment. 

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

When it comes to Check Point Remote Access VPN, my company is still in the testing phase and will be due for a rollout with our client, who has wanted a VPN connection since last summer.

If I compare the solution with some of the other products my company has used in the past, I can definitely see that it has some valuable features that allow me to see the traffic and what a client does. With the tool, I cannot only see a session but also the resources our company's clients are connected to since I can do so with the help of firewall logs. I like the overall visibility of the product.

The thing I like about Check Point Remote Access VPN stems from the fact that it terminates at the firewall wherever the client is going, and it works in an unencrypted manner, which allows me to see where the traffic is going. I can gain access to the clients' networks with NetScaler and with the aid of a packet sniffer.

Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte.

For improvements in the product, I can create a wishlist since it is a VPN technology. I would love to see what is available on the VPN connections, but it is important for our company to check the encryption part of it.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for a couple of years.

The firewall part of the tool has been running for a while now without the need for any reboot. I don't have any stability-related issues with the product.

When it comes to VPN products, our company talks about putting them on another internet gateway, which seems to be an easy process. Using the scalability feature of the product seems to be a painless process, in my opinion.

I have contacted the technical support for the solution. The solution's technical support responds immediately. The quality of the solution's technical support is good. If a member of the technical support team doesn't have the answer to my queries, then they ensure that someone else who has the knowledge responds to my issues.

I rate the support team a ten out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with Citrix NetScaler since it is the only product that I have used as a remote access VPN tool.

I feel Check Point Remote Access VPN is better than Citrix NetScaler.

The product's initial setup phase was easy. I haven't had any formal training, but I have learned everything related to the tool.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

A team in my company takes care of the deployment phase.

The reason I started to use Check Point Remote Access VPN is because it is preferred by the organization where I currently work.

The solution needs maintenance. There is a need to update the policy rules and ensure that the firmware is kept up-to-date.

I request the potential users of the product to invest time in going through the knowledge-based articles since they have a plethora of information.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

We use Check Point Remote Access VPN for security features.

We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products. It is difficult to restore settings in cases of connection failure. This particular area needs improvement.

We have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years.

The product is stable.

We have 3000 Check Point Remote Access VPNs in our organization. It is a scalable product. We can increase and downgrade the access as much as possible. The usage depends on the licensing model.

The technical support team only responds to the problems where the device stops working. Apart from that, they don’t reply to normal issues.

Neutral

We used ForcePoint before. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and easy to connect.

The product is easy to maintain. It takes a few days to install and troubleshoot.

The product has average pricing. We purchase its yearly pricing.

I advise others to use the product instead of multiple SD solutions and hardware products. I rate Check Point Remote Access VPN a seven out of ten.

In the context of general user remote access, we utilize Check Point VPN concentrators that serve as both Internet firewalls and error ID locations. Our remote access system, constructed on a Check Point foundation, consists of four systems.

Currently, I'm part of the network team, and my primary concern revolves around maintaining a stable connectivity setup. It's important for this connectivity solution to have provisions, possibly within AWS, that enhance security measures and provide more security-related advantages. From my standpoint, our solution serves a general purpose. It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues. Overall, it suits our needs well.

There were some issues with automation and instability. But overall, these self-integrated products offer exceptional support and prove highly beneficial from an administrative standpoint. It isn't overwhelming, as seen with instances like in other vendors. The platform is convenient to manage and scalable.

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for one year. 

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

Technical support is essential in our case. We encountered a few instances related to next-generation firewalls, though they might not be of direct interest.

In general, the response rate to our inquiries has been quick. Our cases are categorized as server-to-server or critical solutions, resulting in immediate internet connectivity for addressing the issue. The level of support we receive is of a very high standard.

Positive

We previously used Cisco AnyConnect. Both solutions are similar. However, the difference lies in the security features rather than the networking aspects.

Ultimately, the decision was made to expand and implement Check Point for the entire user base. This choice was reasonable based on the circumstances and the initial security in Check Point. We also had a phase where we utilized both solutions simultaneously. Eventually, due to our requirements, switching solely to Check Point proved to be the more precise decision, aligning with our corporate requirements.

The initial setup is not very easy and we are partnered with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution. The process involves designing the overall network module, carrying out installations, configuring appropriately, and initiating the initial setup. The array agent is then deployed to individual personal computers. It takes almost one quarter.

We had a partnered team with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution.

When working with remote access, the goal is to define the exact issue we aim to resolve. Identifying a suitable solution for discussions is crucial while focusing on establishing a high-level solution design. Following this, the implementation can proceed. Formulating a solid architecture utilizing Check Point isn't overly complex. The service switches provided within the system confer a sophisticated level of functionality.

Based on these, I would rate it a nine out of ten.