We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides the flexibility to configure, switch, and manage configurations through cloud permissions or performance settings."
"Amazon stack is easy to use in combination with other Amazon services, so it was a logical continuity."
"The technical support is very strong. We've had issues with the solution and configuration and we got very good support."
"The best thing about Amazon API Gateway is that it can authenticate and authorize requests without going to our back end."
"Amazon API Gateway can integrate with ECS and Lambda."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"Amazon API Gateway facilitates our serverless architecture, particularly with Lambda, by allowing us to perform various tasks. For instance, Lambda functions authorize API calls, execute multiple workloads, and integrate with other services like Azure and Kubernetes. Additionally, we leverage Lambda functions behind the Amazon API Gateway to query databases, process data, and interact with different systems."
"One of the most valuable aspects of API Gateway is its native integration with AWS services."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"The performance is good."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The user interface could be improved, as well as customer support and having a local customer representative in a country."
"Monitoring could be improved."
"Its performance and scalability could be better compared to one of its competitors."
"The API Gateway lacks the capability to directly facilitate API strategy development or user onboarding workflows."
"It would be useful to have a more complete development environment for the developer, with different integrative capabilities to manage all the life cycles for the API. I think the full version formula for that is really useful. They should improve the development environment for easier integration."
"From a use cases perspective, you need to have an internal and external gateway. AWS can only handle external traffic so has to be used together with another solution."
"There should be more videos and documentation about the new features that are released every month."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. webMethods.io API report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.