We compared Cato Networks and Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: After evaluating user reviews, it is evident that both Cato Networks and Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform have received positive reviews. Cato Networks is appreciated for its simple installation process and valuable features, while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is highly regarded for its strong security measures, user-friendly interface, and extensive control options. Cato Networks stands out for its quick and efficient setup, whereas Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform shines in terms of comprehensive security measures and ease of use. However, some users mention that managing remote sites can be time-consuming with Cato Networks, and there may be intermittent performance issues and a learning curve for beginners in zero trust models with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform. It is worth mentioning that both products offer excellent customer service and support.
"It is a stable solution...it is a scalable solution."
"The visibility control and security aspects are amazing."
"The most valuable feature of Cato Networks is the CASB and the documentation is useful."
"The WAN aggregation feature is the most valuable."
"It's a pretty straightforward solution."
"Cato offers all the functionality found in other solution. The life cycle management is always very stable."
"The feature that I find to be the most valuable is the bandwidth aggregation."
"I haven't had any trouble, and practically forget that I'm using it."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public."
"Cato Networks could improve their intrusion detection. There is not a lot in place."
"The tool needs to be more granular. Its reports are not very in-depth."
"The product may be complex for users with few years of experience."
"They should include a web application firewall feature in the solution."
"Cato Networks security could be better."
"They should add more sophisticated security features. It should also be integrated into the cloud."
"Modifying or incorporating Cato Network to work with a third-party platform, such as Microsoft, or other Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offerings would be beneficial. Having more integration partners would help the users implement the solution."
"Web application firewalling (WAF) is a feature we would like to have in this solution and does not exist yet."
"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."
More Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in ZTNA as a Service with 21 reviews while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is ranked 15th in ZTNA as a Service with 1 review. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform writes "Helps to secure applications from public but needs improvement in documentation ". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco SD-WAN and Fortinet FortiGate, whereas Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform is most compared with Twingate and Axis Security.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.