We performed a comparison between Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cisco Security Portfolio solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is AnyConnect's reliability."
"You can use it from anywhere."
"It is stable. We haven't had issues so far."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is very stable."
"The solution is quite stable."
"Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client's most valuable feature is the ability to connect to our enterprise applications, on-premise applications, and cloud any place in the world"
"What I like most about Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is that it's easy to use, and that is its main advantage. You can use it without the need for any setup because it's centrally pre-installed, so you just need to log in with your username and password. I didn't experience any problems with the solution in terms of losing connectivity. It works very well every time."
"It works as a good RADIUS server. It has lots of features. It works with all the proprietary Cisco AB pairs and features."
"A lot of customers use a third party to manage their guest Wi-Fi. Cisco ISE presents the ability to bring that in-house so that customers can have full control over it, change the branding, and get extra telemetry from it and the user data. It works really well for our customers."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco ISE is its seamless integration with the switches and the entire suite, enabling wireless access and smooth client information retrieval."
"We were originally a Cisco shop and Cisco ISE integrated well with our other Cisco switches and networks."
"The user experience of the solution is great. It's a very transparent system."
"Visitors can be granted access to the wifi network using their cellphones, notebooks or tablets in a very easy way. The ease of accessibility that anyone can have to the network is very quick and is a big improvement in our network."
"We have multiple metal devices from different places that use management, so we need to know who would be accessing all those devices and what changes are being done to those metal devices. With Cisco ISE we have visibility of all the changes happening on those devices."
"It does a good job of establishing trust for each access request, no matter the source. It's also very effective at helping with the distributed network and at securing access."
"Complicated scenarios are difficult to deploy. On a scale from one to ten, with one being the most difficult, I'd give a rating of between two and three for the initial setup."
"The setup could be simplified for solutions engineers with a wizard."
"I believe that the authentication component may be enhanced. SAML, more specifically user authentication."
"Even when your internet speed is good, once you connect to the VPN the speed gets automatically reduced, which is worrisome."
"It would be useful to have an automatic install process where if you connect and you don't have the latest version, it should be automatically done."
"It would be good to have some improvements to the quality of service."
"There are some issues with connectivity and latency that should be improved."
"Sometimes if we're always having some network issues, or maybe the client is having some network issues, we might get disconnected."
"Also, the menus could have been much simpler. There are many redundant things. That's a problem with all Cisco solutions. There are too many menus and redundant things on all of them."
"There is room for improvement in CLI. Most things are done through the GUI, and there aren't many commands or troubleshooting options available compared to other Cisco products like switches and routers."
"In order to make it a ten, it should be more user-friendly. You need somebody who is knowledgeable about it to use it. It's not easy to use. We have to rely heavily on technical support."
"I would like to see them simplify the dashboard. It's very configurable, but, at the same time, it's not easy to maneuver through it. They should "Merakify" it."
"The user interface could be more user-friendly."
"I don't like the fact that we can see the logs only for 24 hours. Maybe that happens because of the way we set it up."
"Difficult to figure out the protocols and nodes in order to implement correctly."
"The web interface needs improvement. The new web interface that they have is not as easy to manage and we find it to be very slow."
More Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is ranked 6th in Cisco Security Portfolio with 69 reviews while Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Cisco Security Portfolio with 138 reviews. Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is rated 8.6, while Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client writes "A stable solution that helps users connect to resources when working from home". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Genian NAC. See our Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client vs. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) report.
See our list of best Cisco Security Portfolio vendors.
We monitor all Cisco Security Portfolio reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.