We performed a comparison between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE EVA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The InfoSight feature helps us with troubleshooting problems in our environment."
"For virtualization, the failure rate is much less compared to traditional storage where you need more hard drives"
"The technical support is good."
"It is a really stable product. We have not had any major issues at the moment."
"It has helped with more than just serving data, but also with recovery."
"The most valuable features are their tight integration with VMware, their multi-node architecture, and their copy services, such as Peer Persistence."
"It is fast and stable. It is really helping us a lot in terms of data store, etc."
"This product is stable, aside from the performance problems we had."
"There have been no fail-stop failures for the last five years."
"HPE has reliable support for HDD replacement."
"The solution's most valuable feature is storage provisioning, which allows me to easily provision the disk space on the servers."
"It is very stable."
"I would like to see more flexibility with the cloud. I've actually just been in a presentation about it, here at HPE Discover 2018, so those features are coming."
"As long as they can keep the solution stable, it will be good. Stability is very important to us."
"I need flexibility for interoperability across multiple platforms, not just HPE."
"The tool has low storage and low performance. This can be solved by adding more disco to the solution. The product’s pricing is also suited for enterprise businesses rather than smaller ones.I would like to see better performance, UI, and compatibility with other products in future releases."
"3PAR has StoreOnce and replication. I would like it if they worked together. Or, if I had Nimble and put that either in DR or a primary cohesive management, but still use the cool features of 3PAR, that would be awesome."
"The solution lacks reliability."
"The interface could be improved to match the system."
"I want artificial intelligence. I don't want anybody from my team to touch it anymore. I want the AI to do everything."
"Performance could probably be improve with faster controllers, but it is already an old device. We do have performance problems now, but it is a rather old device, so we have what we have."
"I faced some issues during the disk replacement process in HPE EVA."
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is ranked 3rd in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 299 reviews while HPE EVA is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 4 reviews. HPE 3PAR StoreServ is rated 8.6, while HPE EVA is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE 3PAR StoreServ writes "The product's technical support is outstanding as I can reach someone right away". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE EVA writes "Has the ability to automatically deal with faulty disks". HPE 3PAR StoreServ is most compared with HPE Primera, Dell Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, NetApp AFF and HPE Alletra, whereas HPE EVA is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA. See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. HPE EVA report.
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.