Dell VPLEX Reviews

Volume replication in almost real time, across metro distances.

With the help of EMC VPLEX, we improved the architecture of the geographic redundant infrastructure our application required.

Cost. This is really expensive.

I’ve used VPLEX for six months, during the architecture and implementation phase of the project.

I was in contact with presales support only, which did a great job.

We did use a previous solution, but it had a totally different architecture. With the help of EMC VPLEX we simplified the architecture and improved the response time.

The setup is pretty complex, since the solution is stretched across two sites at metro distances.

At the time of the project, I was not aware of any similar product.

The ability to move disks online without disruption to the environment.

Ability to create geographically distributed clusters.

Possibility to replicate volumes with storage devices from multiple vendors.

The production environment needs improvement.

I have used VPLEX for five years.

We experienced increases in latency in accesses to disks and some bugs on engines.

I did not have problem with scalability.

There were delays in solving problems.

I have two solutions: HPE 3PAR and VPLEX.

It is very laborious to allocate volumes on servers.

The VPLEX, along with the RecoverPoint price, can raise the price a lot.

Due to the large number of models and different brands it is a very good solution to virtualize volumes.

Evaluate the native features and a possibility of a good integration with the RecoverPoint.