Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell VPLEX vs IBM SAN Volume Control comparison

Dell Technologies and IBM are both solutions in the Storage Management category. Dell Technologies is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.3, while IBM is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Dell Technologies holds a 8.2% mindshare in SM, compared to IBM’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Dell VPLEX
Read 18 Dell VPLEX reviews
  • 461 Views
  • 232 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
IBM SAN Volume Control
Read 5 IBM SAN Volume Control reviews
  • 427 Views
  • 200 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Dell VPLEX and IBM SAN Volume Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Storage Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell VPLEX
Ranking in Storage Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM SAN Volume Control
Ranking in Storage Management
6th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Storage Management category, the mindshare of Dell VPLEX is 8.2%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SAN Volume Control is 6.3%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Storage Management
 

Featured Reviews

Sayed Zuber - PeerSpot reviewer
It's an excellent solution for data mobility and disaster recovery, but the CLI can be difficult for beginners
Dell VPLEX currently requires Flash Player to access the GUI. It would be better to have a web-based HTML management interface. The encryption could also be improved. When the host writes data, it goes from VPLEX back to the physical storage. The physical storage device will do encryption or use an algorithm called Data Address Encryption. If there are vulnerabilities between the host and the storage device, you can lose your data. I suggest encrypting the data before it is sent from the host to the storage. I would also recommend using the NVM protocol in VPLEX. It still has Flash Player and a local SATA disk built into the Flash Player. You need to Flash the disk to SAS and then SATA. The NVM protocol is better.
Read full review
Nagendra Nekkala. - PeerSpot reviewer
A sustainable product that has ultra-low latency and reliable security features
Initially, we had some challenges with massive amounts of customer data. We have an airport segment where the passenger data are required, and it’s huge data. We needed a system that could store bulk data with low latency and provide a good customer experience. The solution is very famous. Ultra latency provides miraculous performance and productivity. It also enables advanced virtualization for good scalability. Anyone can opt to use the product. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of VPLEX storage is its ability to consolidate storage. It also provides the highest RPO and RTOs for replication technology. VPLEX enables application mobility."
"Mobility enables us to carry out an internal migration of data."
"Dell's technical support is awesome. We received instant support from EMC as long as we had an active contract."
"Storage virtualization and geographic resilience for Metro Sans, plus a great performance improvement."
"The capacity to migrate machines onto VPLEX is great — it's very clean. We can migrate machines and add arrays easily."
"Its mirroring capabilities allow for data to be mirrored across two different data centers, so if one center were to crash or fail, the other center could take over and keep everything running smoothly."
"The solution works well. It's very reliable."
"The most valuable feature is deduplication, as we have no duplication in the snapshots."
"The solution is easy to use, easily configurable, and easy to upgrade, manipulate, and add new storage."
"The most valuable features of IBM SAN Volume Control are the copy services, performance metrics, and analysis. Additionally, they have upgraded and introduced visual volumes."
"The product has an ultra-low latency."
"With SVC it is very easy to manage and to use for migration, meaning that when we want to move or to keep control of the volume or update a server database, it is very easy. That's why we use it."
"The virtualization layer has been great."
 

Cons

"The price is a problem with EMC due to the fact that it's more expensive than the other vendors."
"With Dell VPLEX, there are some bugs with Broadcom."
"VPLEX hardware migration to spare equipment in case of major disruption."
"Today, it needs a huge effort that is not acceptable during disaster recovery."
"I would like to have site-to-site replication capability for applications."
"Dell VPLEX should improve its integration and user interface and be easier to configure."
"VPLEX's engine-based architecture is complex, so the implementation is challenging and takes more time. It's also difficult to fix hardware issues. When an appliance fails, it takes Dell EMC a long time to fix it because spare parts are in short supply."
"There can be delays in getting performance reports."
More Dell VPLEX cons
"They just need to put in the snap volume because now they use what is called a flash copy. This means that you have to take all the volume instead of NetApp which uses their snapshot."
"IBM SAN Volume Control could improve by better integrations with other vendor systems. IBM SAN Volume Control can store the environment and are able to integrate with Veeam, but I don't know if they can integrate as well with SVC or other vendors' systems."
"Patch management and upgrades must be made easier."
"IBM support can be very slow."
"I would like to see the usage of virtualized storage boxes improved. I'd like to see this feature fixed, especially for SVC controller, and to be able to hold more storage."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"VPLEX is a little bit expensive in my personal opinion."
"We struck a great deal with Dell EMC, so for us, VPLEX was not very expensive."
"With SAN Volume Controller, we need to license by terabyte."
"The initial price of IBM SAN Volume Control is steep."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell VPLEX?
Dell's technical support is awesome. We received instant support from EMC as long as we had an active contract.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell VPLEX?
This is an enterprise solution so licensing costs are generally on the higher side. There will be additional costs if you want to do a network cluster for business servers.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Dell VPLEX?
Dell VPLEX should improve its integration and user interface and be easier to configure. Any EMX product, be it PowerMax, VMAX, or DMAX, works based on the CLI. A person has to be very good at runn...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM SAN Volume Control?
The product has an ultra-low latency.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM SAN Volume Control?
Heterogenous Storage management.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM SAN Volume Control?
Initially, we had some challenges with massive amounts of customer data. We have an airport segment where the passenger data are required, and it’s huge data. We needed a system that could store bu...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs Dell VPLEX Logo
IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs Dell VPLEX
Compared 42% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Dell VPLEX Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Dell VPLEX
Compared 14% of the time
More Dell VPLEX Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Dell VPLEX
November 2024
Dell VPLEX reportDownload Dell VPLEX product report
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
October 2024
IBM SAN Volume Control reportDownload IBM SAN Volume Control product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM SVC
 

Learn More

Video not available
Dell Technologies
IBM
 

Overview

Wth EMC VPLEX you can deploy next-generation virtualization architecture to enable simultaneous information access within, between, and across data centers, move applications, virtual machines, and data in and between data centers without impacting users and deliver application and data availability within the data center and over distance with full infrastructure utilization and zero downtime.

Built with IBM Spectrum Virtualize software—part of the IBM Spectrum Storage family—IBM SAN Volume Controller (SVC) is an enterprise-class storage system that helps organizations achieve better data economics by supporting the new large scale workloads that are critical to success. SVC systems can handle the massive volumes of data from mobile and social applications and enable flexible hybrid multicloud deployments and deliver the performance and scalability needed to gain insights from the latest analytics technologies.

 

Sample Customers

Kindred Healthcare, Regis Aged Care, WeBank SpA, Panduit, Munson Healthcare
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control
October 2024
Free Report: Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control report.
See our list of best Storage Management vendors.

We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.