Docker Reviews

Our primary case use is for the deployment of microservices.

The most valuable feature is that it is cost-saving.

I think Docker can improve as it relates to overall stability.

I have used Docker over the past year.

There is stability but it could be improved.

Scalability is good and there are about ten thousand individuals using Docker.

The initial setup was simple and straightforward. Before the deployment of Docker, they have to be proficient in deploying applications, at least the basic deployment, and how any application deployment would take place. Some basic knowledge would be required.

The deployment can be done in-house in about two to five minutes.

Docker is cost-effective and open-source.

I would rate Docker an eight on a scale of one to ten.

We are using Docker as a container for our server setup. We use images of Windows, Linux, or Ubuntu. Additionally, we install solution support.

The most valuable feature of Docker is the dedicated QA environment for connecting the team members. Additionally, there are many core features available and it is highly secure when we are imaging a client's server.

Docker could improve by having more advanced features.

I have been using Docker for approximately seven years.

Docker is stable.

The scalability of Docker is good.

We have approximately eight people using the solution.

I have not used the support from Docker.

There is a single setup of Docker and there is no need for improvement. It is easy to do. The implementation can be done in approximately 40 minutes.

We are using the open-source version of the solution.

Our company is using Docker because it is a clients requirement.

I rate Docker a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution to create the node for the containers to deploy multiple apps. We have iOS applications in the containers, and we can build multiple microservices in the containers. It provides access to the content for public IPs. We can host it, for example, on AWS can contain some instances in Azure or AWS.

In my project, it is easy to just build all the microservices locally in my local system through Docker. I can use it to test and deploy all the microservices in containers, including the front-end applications as well. Everything communicates from container to container. It's very easy. I can have multiple Docker files and deploy them easily into the cluster.

It's really helpful for building containers and handling multiple apps.

We have three applications. They are running on Windows using C Sharp, Java, and Python. We're able to build containers for each.

It's easy to run a single command and run the containers on a local machine. It's very easy to adjust the logs and describe your containers properly.

We are able to stop our containers or stop the service with a single command. That's very handy.

The stability is very good. 

There are a lot of features included in the solution. 

We have found that it is not easy to install it into a Windows system. I get very frustrated with Windows. When I install a Docker instance on a Windows machine, it is not easy to handle. In contrast, it's very easy to use on the Mac OS.

I'd like the solution to be more flexible.

I've used the solution for about three to four years. 

The solution is reliable and stable. I'd rate the stability nine out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is very scalable. I'd rate the scalability nine out of ten.

The solution is open-source the support you get depends on the licensing you have.

Neutral

I have witnessed an ROI while using the solution. I'd rate the ability to achieve ROI nine out of ten.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. It's likely the latest.

I'd recommend the solution to others. It is very easy to use. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

Our primary use case for Docker is local development. We use Windows for most of our use cases, which means we need two Docker Desktop tools.

With Docker, it does not matter what you run in the container on your local computer or on your server, because the configuration is the same and there will not be a conflict. I think this a cool Docker feature and also a fast one.

We have encountered a few performance issues with docker along the way, but this does not happen often. Nevertheless, I would like Docker's performance to be better.

Docker has less support if you use a container. However, with Linux, I need to use a container. I would love to have it available on Linux.

I have been using Docker for three years.

I am satisfied with OS Docker's performance and stability. The current version is quite good with our application.

I haven't used Docker's technical support service.

The initial setup was easy. There is a need in this solution for you to know how this image works or how commands work, but you do not need to memorize commands. Docker has documentation available where you can set up the view, set it up in new Windows, and then you just have to download the Docker Desktop. After that, you're able to create Docker images, containers, and other things.

The deployment usually takes less than 30 minutes, depending on application turbulence.

I would advise that if you complete an issue – in your local or production environment – and you do not want to face issues or any difficulties in developing the application, Docker is very easy to install, set up, and use.

Documentation is quite good. In addition, if I am testing for errors, then community support also goes to any kind of zero-out solution. Most of the data solutions available in the community are in the Docker workflow.

I would rate the Docker solution a seven out of ten, with one being the worst and 10 being the best in the field.

I am using Docker for setting up my development environments.

The most valuable feature of Docker is automation. When I deploy the solution I am confident it will work anywhere. It is reliable and easy to use.

The solution could improve with a GUI instead of only a command line interface. Having to use the command line interface can be a hassle.

I have been using Docker for approximately seven years.

Docker is a stable solution.

I rate the stability of Docker an eight out of ten.

I have not used the support from Docker.

I was using Linux containers prior to Docker, but the Linux containers come with a lot of packages and configurations.

The initial setup of Docker is simple. However, there are times when I use Linux containers and there can be problems.

The deployment of Docker on Microsoft Windows can be difficult, but on a Linux system, it is easier.

I use a package manager to deploy Docker.

I deployed the solution myself.

I have received a return on investment using the solution. If I was using it for commercial use I would see more of a return.

The solution is easy to use, automate, and script.

I rate Docker a ten out of ten.

We work with containers for forecasting. 

The solution's most valuable feature is the Dockerfile, which makes the life of developers easy. Developers get a real understanding of container creation. 

I have encountered network issues while connecting with microservices. I want to optimize the application layers over the bucket. It should also have better documentation. 

I have been working with the solution for seven years. 

I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. 

We solve issues using the documentation. 

Neutral

Docker's implementation is straightforward. However, it can get a bit complicated when you are doing sophisticated implementation. 

We have seen ROI with the tool's use. 

Docker's price is good. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

We use the solution to pick up applications and migrate them to run inside containers in Java. 

I am impressed with the product's independence. We can also deploy it anywhere. 

The Kubernetes blocks need improvement since Docker has many holes in it. 

I have been using the product for four to five years. 

The product's initial setup was easy. 

I would rate the product a seven out of ten. You won't have much choice if you choose the cloud. The tool helps to reduce costs. 

We use the solution to develop microservices architecture. Also, we use its compose features while working with complicated environments.

The solution's most valuable feature is portability. It helps us predict the solution's capabilities on any system.

They should improve the solution's user interface. 

We have been using the solution since 2017.

Sometimes, the solution's containers fail to start on the local machines due to memory extension issues. 

I rate its stability as an eight.

We have more than 100 developers using the solution in our organization. It needs to be more scalable for local machines. 

The solution is easy to install and requires significantly less time to complete the process. But, upgrading it in the Windows and Linux systems is time-consuming.

We deploy the solution with the help of our in-house team, including a system administrator and a few DevOps engineers. The deployment process involves preparing a docker image for execution.

We don't need to pay for the solution's license as we use the convenience edition.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it as an eight.