Docker Reviews

We use this solution for data collection and transfer across applications.

We find the auto scaling and auto healing functionality of this solution very good.

We would like to see improvement in adding the node into the Docker Swarm cluster, as at present it is a little tricky and requires a lot of manual steps.

We have been working with this solution for over six years.

We have found this to be a stable product.

Generally, this solution is scalable. However, each container has to be scaled separately and manually.

The initial, basic setup for this solution is easy via the cloud.

We implemented this solution in-house.

This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs.

This solution is being developed and improved regularly, so we recommend organizations to look at the cloud-based variant.  This will make it easier to stay as up to date as possible.

 I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I am using Docker for setting up my development environments.

The most valuable feature of Docker is automation. When I deploy the solution I am confident it will work anywhere. It is reliable and easy to use.

The solution could improve with a GUI instead of only a command line interface. Having to use the command line interface can be a hassle.

I have been using Docker for approximately seven years.

Docker is a stable solution.

I rate the stability of Docker an eight out of ten.

I have not used the support from Docker.

I was using Linux containers prior to Docker, but the Linux containers come with a lot of packages and configurations.

The initial setup of Docker is simple. However, there are times when I use Linux containers and there can be problems.

The deployment of Docker on Microsoft Windows can be difficult, but on a Linux system, it is easier.

I use a package manager to deploy Docker.

I deployed the solution myself.

I have received a return on investment using the solution. If I was using it for commercial use I would see more of a return.

The solution is easy to use, automate, and script.

I rate Docker a ten out of ten.

Our primary use case for Docker is local development. We use Windows for most of our use cases, which means we need two Docker Desktop tools.

With Docker, it does not matter what you run in the container on your local computer or on your server, because the configuration is the same and there will not be a conflict. I think this a cool Docker feature and also a fast one.

We have encountered a few performance issues with docker along the way, but this does not happen often. Nevertheless, I would like Docker's performance to be better.

Docker has less support if you use a container. However, with Linux, I need to use a container. I would love to have it available on Linux.

I have been using Docker for three years.

I am satisfied with OS Docker's performance and stability. The current version is quite good with our application.

I haven't used Docker's technical support service.

The initial setup was easy. There is a need in this solution for you to know how this image works or how commands work, but you do not need to memorize commands. Docker has documentation available where you can set up the view, set it up in new Windows, and then you just have to download the Docker Desktop. After that, you're able to create Docker images, containers, and other things.

The deployment usually takes less than 30 minutes, depending on application turbulence.

I would advise that if you complete an issue – in your local or production environment – and you do not want to face issues or any difficulties in developing the application, Docker is very easy to install, set up, and use.

Documentation is quite good. In addition, if I am testing for errors, then community support also goes to any kind of zero-out solution. Most of the data solutions available in the community are in the Docker workflow.

I would rate the Docker solution a seven out of ten, with one being the worst and 10 being the best in the field.

Our primary case use is for the deployment of microservices.

The most valuable feature is that it is cost-saving.

I think Docker can improve as it relates to overall stability.

I have used Docker over the past year.

There is stability but it could be improved.

Scalability is good and there are about ten thousand individuals using Docker.

The initial setup was simple and straightforward. Before the deployment of Docker, they have to be proficient in deploying applications, at least the basic deployment, and how any application deployment would take place. Some basic knowledge would be required.

The deployment can be done in-house in about two to five minutes.

Docker is cost-effective and open-source.

I would rate Docker an eight on a scale of one to ten.

We are using Docker as a container for our server setup. We use images of Windows, Linux, or Ubuntu. Additionally, we install solution support.

The most valuable feature of Docker is the dedicated QA environment for connecting the team members. Additionally, there are many core features available and it is highly secure when we are imaging a client's server.

Docker could improve by having more advanced features.

I have been using Docker for approximately seven years.

Docker is stable.

The scalability of Docker is good.

We have approximately eight people using the solution.

I have not used the support from Docker.

There is a single setup of Docker and there is no need for improvement. It is easy to do. The implementation can be done in approximately 40 minutes.

We are using the open-source version of the solution.

Our company is using Docker because it is a clients requirement.

I rate Docker a nine out of ten.

We work with containers for forecasting. 

The solution's most valuable feature is the Dockerfile, which makes the life of developers easy. Developers get a real understanding of container creation. 

I have encountered network issues while connecting with microservices. I want to optimize the application layers over the bucket. It should also have better documentation. 

I have been working with the solution for seven years. 

I rate the tool's scalability a nine out of ten. 

We solve issues using the documentation. 

Neutral

Docker's implementation is straightforward. However, it can get a bit complicated when you are doing sophisticated implementation. 

We have seen ROI with the tool's use. 

Docker's price is good. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

We use the solution to develop microservices architecture. Also, we use its compose features while working with complicated environments.

The solution's most valuable feature is portability. It helps us predict the solution's capabilities on any system.

They should improve the solution's user interface. 

We have been using the solution since 2017.

Sometimes, the solution's containers fail to start on the local machines due to memory extension issues. 

I rate its stability as an eight.

We have more than 100 developers using the solution in our organization. It needs to be more scalable for local machines. 

The solution is easy to install and requires significantly less time to complete the process. But, upgrading it in the Windows and Linux systems is time-consuming.

We deploy the solution with the help of our in-house team, including a system administrator and a few DevOps engineers. The deployment process involves preparing a docker image for execution.

We don't need to pay for the solution's license as we use the convenience edition.

I recommend the solution to others and rate it as an eight.