We performed a comparison between Codespaces and Docker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of the solution are Copilot and Advanced Security."
"Codespaces' most valuable feature is the repository, which helps the developers to work together. Its data commands are also useful."
"The product allows us to implement feature-related changes or improvements on time. Whenever I write a section of the code or create a new code, it automatically integrates with the former code."
"The most valuable features of Docker are its security, detailed documentation, and ease of use, and the Docker Swarm is not as complex as Kubernetes."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is that it provides a containerized environment. The isolation between the environments is beneficial. Additionally, the solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is the dedicated QA environment for connecting the team members. Additionally, there are many core features available and it is highly secure when we are imaging a client's server."
"The most valuable feature is that it is cost-saving."
"Docker is very reliable. It's easy to scale, and it's very stable."
"We are able to stop our containers or stop the service with a single command."
"The most valuable feature of Docker is that it revolutionized virtualization by providing a new approach with containers that completely nullified the time it used to take to deploy applications on virtual servers, resulting in deployment times that can be as quick as milliseconds, unless it is a heavy application, such as Java. Additionally, resource utilization has greatly improved with Docker, allowing for more resources to be allocated to other tasks. These are a few key features that make Docker a preferred choice."
"The solution's most valuable feature is having containers independent of the operating system or environment."
"We get merge conflict errors and need to resolve them."
"The product indicates incorrect statistics."
"The technical support could respond faster."
"One item that could be improved is the overall stability of Docker."
"If you install Docker on a host, it creates its own firewalls. It can become an issue. Usually, when you want to install Docker, you need to restart the firewall or restart the active tables on the machine, but this is not the case with Kubernetes. It uses the default set up by the next administrator, but with Docker, you have to restart the firewall and restart Docker before the firewall on the system will be okay. If you do not the rules will not be created."
"The command line interface could be more intuitive. I constantly struggle with it."
"Unfortunately, base images are not currently available."
"The volumes for persistent storage could be more user friendly right out of the box."
"Deployment could be quicker."
"Stability is an area with a shortcoming."
"I have encountered network issues while connecting with microservices. I want to optimize the application layers over the bucket. It should also have better documentation."
Codespaces is ranked 5th in Development Platforms with 3 reviews while Docker is ranked 2nd in Development Platforms with 40 reviews. Codespaces is rated 8.6, while Docker is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Codespaces writes "Used to integrate into the CI/CD process and streamline the editing and updating of code". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". Codespaces is most compared with AWS Cloud9, Replit, JetBrains IDEs, RStudio and NetBeans, whereas Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Codespaces vs. Docker report.
See our list of best Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.