Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user862527 - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
MSP
Provides us with an easy way to handle a lot of containers
Pros and Cons
  • "The ability to handle a sequence of front- and back-ends gives the user the opportunity to send traffic through different services."

    How has it helped my organization?

    With an OpenShift environment, HAProxy gives us an easy way to handle a lot of containers.

    What is most valuable?

    The ability to handle a sequence of front- and back-ends gives the user the opportunity to send traffic through different services.

    What needs improvement?

    HAProxy needs to improve its ability to handle a lot of connections, to be more like NGINX.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    One to three years.
    Buyer's Guide
    HAProxy
    October 2024
    Learn what your peers think about HAProxy. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
    814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    No issues with stability.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I haven't had any issues with scalability but, as I mentioned above, some reviewers have said that NGINX is able to handle more connections than HAProxy.

    How was the initial setup?

    It was straightforward. I created an Ansible playbook to install HAProxy. It is simple to install and the configuration files are easy to understand.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I have always used an open-source version.

    What other advice do I have?

    Before using it, you need to understand your environment's sizing and check if HAProxy is able to handle the quantity of connections.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Network security at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
    Real User
    Works for application load balancing, but pricing, monitoring, and reports need improvement
    Pros and Cons
    • "The feature that I have found the most valuable is that it works for my use case of application load balancing. I'm using it for PeerSense, and it's easy enough for PeerSense."
    • "Pricing, monitoring, and reports can be improved."

    What is our primary use case?

    We are using it for application load balancing.

    What is most valuable?

    The feature that I have found the most valuable is that it works for my use case of application load balancing. I'm using it for PeerSense, and it's easy enough for PeerSense.

    What needs improvement?

    Pricing, monitoring, and reports can be improved. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have just started using HAProxy. In my organization, they've been using it for a year or two.

    How was the initial setup?

    It was a little bit straightforward.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    HAProxy is free in the initial offer. However, pricing can be improved.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would recommend HAProxy because it is free in the initial offer, which would work for low budget enterprises that don't have much to start with. 

    I would rate HAProxy a seven out of ten. 

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free HAProxy Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: October 2024
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free HAProxy Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.