HPE StoreEasy Reviews

I primarily use the solution to design IP data centers. We are using this solution as a gateway from Fiber.

The solution's most valuable feature is the duplication.

They should make it easier to find features. Other features are difficult to find because it's a Windows server with very little customization.

The configuration tools need improvement. 

When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software.

I've had some issues with StoreEasy in an environment where I have Linux. There were issues around connecting the user access. It doesn't seem to be compatible.

The solution is very stable. We've never suffered from any bugs or glitches.

I've never tried to scale the product. We have about ten people using the solution currently.

Whenever we have a problem, we call HP technical support and they've been great. We're satisfied with the level of support they provide us.

The initial setup is straightforward. It's fairly easy to configure simple environments. Deployment times depend on the client and the environment.

HP assisted with the deployment of the solution.

We pay for licensing every six months. You can also extend support if you need to.

We didn't evaluate any other options before implementing this solution.

We're a StoreEasy partner. The solution is very good. I'd recommend it. It's very easy to use.

I'd rate it nine out of ten.

I use HPE StoreEasy for storage.

I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage.

It would be better if it were more scalable. In the next release, I would like to access some Microsoft Windows storage server features. I guess the newest version of Windows Server has some restrictions.

I have been using HPE StoreEasy for a long time, about ten years. 

StoreEasy has a huge scalability issue.

Technical support is fine. 

On a scale from one to ten, I would give HPE StoreEasy a six.

• Price per terabyte
• Rack density
• Manageability

It is a robust system, reliable, and well-priced.

There is always room for improvement and I’m always trying to drive the density higher. HP is adding more features, which means we're going in the right direction.

No issues with stability.

We can scale out predictably. HP has helped us drive down costs and scale our density.

We previously used SAND. We needed cheap commodity-based servers, something that gave us good price per terabyte.

We didn't really evaluate other options.

Get it. Be sure to check in-house that it does what it needs to do.