HPE StoreEasy vs Nasuni comparison

Read 36 Nasuni reviews

6,447 Views
1,805 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Nasuni and HPE StoreEasy compete in the file storage solutions category. Nasuni has the upper hand due to its advanced features, scalability, and cloud adaptability.

Features: Nasuni offers features like global file locking, unlimited storage capacity, and continuous file versioning, appealing to businesses seeking scalable storage solutions. Users appreciate its simplicity in IT management, security, and disaster recovery capabilities. Nasuni also supports hybrid cloud environments, providing versatility for various deployment needs. HPE StoreEasy focuses on robust data protection and ease of implementation and maintenance, which appeals to users who prefer straightforward storage solutions that integrate easily with existing setups.

Room for Improvement: Nasuni could improve its platform with faster replication speeds and better cloud solutions support such as OneDrive. Users also suggest enhancements in user-friendliness, monitoring capabilities, and a clearer cache structure. HPE StoreEasy could benefit from increased scalability, better configuration tools, improved cluster services, and extended storage capabilities to cloud solutions like ISDN.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nasuni supports hybrid cloud, on-premises, and public cloud deployments, and its technical support is often praised for its proactive customer service despite some timing issues. HPE StoreEasy is typically deployed on-premises, preferred by companies seeking reliable on-premises setups and known for accessible and professional support.

Pricing and ROI: Nasuni's pricing includes per-terabyte licensing, cloud storage, and virtual machines, considered competitively priced. Users notice reduced capital expenses and labor costs, achieving ROI through infrastructure and maintenance savings. HPE StoreEasy's one-time purchase model is seen as economical, with satisfaction in its reliability and flexibility. Nasuni's model caters to businesses looking for scalable and cost-effective cloud adaptability, while StoreEasy is favored for predictable, one-time hardware investments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. Nasuni Report (Updated: April 2026).

Download the complete report

HPE StoreEasy vs. Nasuni

April 2026

Helped 886,719 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nasuni

Ranking in NAS

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (2nd), Cloud Migration (8th), Cloud Storage (13th), Cloud Backup (38th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (20th), Cloud Storage Gateways (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 3.3%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nasuni is 4.1%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE StoreEasy	3.3%
Nasuni	4.1%
Other	92.6%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vinoth Bala

HPE Consultant at Mannai

Reliable, cost-effective, and easy to deploy and manage

I did not have any difficulties in deploying StoreEasy for the customers. It is user-friendly and easy to deploy. It has a Windows Server and a required license built in. For implementation, we follow the HPE documentation. We follow the Configuration guide and the Installation guide. For all HPE products, we follow the HPE documentation. For a single box, it takes a maximum of two days. It depends on the customer's availability. For different configurations, it can take two to three days. The number of people required varies from customer to customer, but generally, it requires three people. For mounting the storage, we always have three people to unbox, mount, and do other things. It does not require any maintenance. From the data center perspective, maintaining StoreEasy is very easy. No customer has complained about any difficulty in maintaining StoreEasy.

Read full review

SwapnilDaga

Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud data management that achieves cost efficiency with advanced data protection features

I am currently using Nasuni for seismic data. We have a huge data size, and we want to reduce costs. Nasuni acts as a caching solution, so we put some data into the cache, and the rest goes to the blob, which helps us save on costs. We use it for applications like Petrol and Tech Log, where 3D…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"StoreEasy is a better solution for backup purposes."

"The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy for us is its easy implementation and maintenance."

"The scalability of HPE StoreEasy is good, with approximately 2,000 users including students, professors, and other departments using it on a daily basis."

"StoreEasy offers reliable file services, which is a critical factor for customers looking for solid infrastructure."

"The tool's data protection capabilities are robust."

"This solution allows me to better and more easily manage user data without impacting my primary storage."

"I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the duplication."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"The company and its technology are solid and their solution architects and support teams are EXCELLENT!!"

"The system has so far been doing an awesome job and working as advertised."

"Snapshot backup is most valuable. It's quick and easy to use. It's controlled only by an administrator, which is very good. It takes 10 seconds to back up a spreadsheet of three or four megabytes."

"We have less downtime and fewer trouble tickets from users who cannot access their shared files. Nasuni has reduced the friction and noise associated with file management because the devices are more reliable."

"My clients are happy with Nasuni because the transmission is seamless, and it consolidates all the existing file servers into one location. Also, Nasuni has no boundaries. It's infinitely expandable. They don't have to rely on the service provider for backup and restoration. It's self-serve."

"Nasuni has eased our job because we don't have to worry about the user requests for additional space anymore."

"Overall, it has been straightforward and we're very pleased with the Nasuni system."

"The global file locking feature is valuable. The ability to quickly deploy new sites is also valuable."

More Nasuni pros

Cons

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

"I would like to improve the tool's technical support. I would also like to see the product's hybrid cloud version."

"There could be improvements in providing more hardening options on the operating system side, similar to iLO's security scoreboard."

"The areas of HPE StoreEasy that need improvement are scalability and migration."

"StoreEasy has a huge scalability issue."

"When I configure the StoreEasy in a complex environment I have problems finding compatibility with all the software."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"One thing to consider is that Nasuni will have the same limitations that a traditional file storage solution will have, although that is because they are taking the place of a traditional architectural model. For example, Office 365 supports collaboration on documents such as Excel files and Word documents, but because Nasuni is a traditional file server, in that sense, it can't make use of that functionality."

"Its interface design or the graphic user interface design can be slightly tweaked in some areas."

"We forecasted that the data at my client's organization would grow by about ten percent annually, but we are migrating more data because we are bringing in some servers that had not previously been within the scope of our license. We expected it would take us two years to reach a specific amount of data, but we hit that mark in one year. The licensing cost skyrocketed, so we need to renegotiate. It puts us in a bind because we are reliant on Nasuni for our service strategy. We can't deny our customers, but we also struggle to pay for that."

"When we have to rebuild a filer or put a new one at a site, one of the things that I would like to be able to do is just repoint the data from Azure to it. As it is now, you need to copy it using a method like Robocopy."

"Migration from existing systems, specifically StorSimple, could be improved, but that solution will be end-of-life by the end of the year. Also, the documentation could be more accessible."

"As administrators, we are used to having control equal to managing an on-prem device. In terms of log analysis and other things we want to do, Nasuni has some limitations limitation on what you do on the Nasuni. Nasuni could add some features to the GUI that make administration a little easier. It's tough when I have to move from one filter to another because there is no way to search it. We have to scroll up and down to find the name of it."

"There are some issues with multiple users accessing the same file simultaneously. There would be times when the global file would lock when several people tried to access it, so that could be optimized more."

"I would like to see Nasuni provide the ability to mirror a Nasuni appliance from one site to another. They could maybe have a standby appliance that is mirrored in a different location for disaster recovery purposes. We can recover if data and a Filer are lost because of a possible ransomware event, but even that takes time to recover. If we had the ability to have a mirrored appliance, we could flip over to that mirrored device and resume instantly rather than repopulate the local appliance with data from the snapshot history in the cloud. This is another feature that we would really like to see, if possible."

More Nasuni cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"Nasuni pricing is average; it's not too high or too low."

"The cost of licensing is negotiated and billed annually per terabyte."

"I would not say it is economically priced, but it is affordable. If you can afford to pay for it, it is worth the money, but it is definitely not overpriced. It is priced about where it needs to be in the market. We were satisfied with the way they did their licensing and how they handled it. I believe they actually license by data size. It is based on how much data is being held on the machine and replicated, and that's completely understandable. So, for us, their pricing was as expected and affordable."

"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage."

"It's cheaper than a lot of alternatives but it's not cheap."

"The cost is based on the capacity, which is approximately $100 USD per terabyte."

"There are annual costs that we pay for maintaining all of the snapshot history in the cloud. That is the primary cost that we pay. We occasionally buy newer Nasuni appliances or deploy them to new offices when the need occurs. That capital equipment expenses is less than the cost of buying new file storage systems. For the most part, you are trading a CapEx cost of storage equipment for an OpEx cost for management of all the snapshot data in the cloud."

"Our agreement is set up such that we pay annually per terabyte, and we buy a chunk of it at a time. Then if we run out of space, we go back to them and buy another chunk."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Comparisons

Compared 33% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 9% of the time

Qumulo vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 10% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 6% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Qumulo vs Nasuni

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Product Reports

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

NAS

March 2026

Download Nasuni product report

March 2026

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

No data available

Overview

HP StoreEasy Storage is the #1 NAS product family under $15K USD range in units. Count on optimized, efficient, secure and highly available storage that simply addresses file and application storage challenges, no matter the size of your business. Straightforward features and new enhancements mean simpler installation and monitoring of utilization and health status.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Nasuni is a file data services enterprise focused on assisting firms with their digital transformation, global expansion, and information awareness. The Nasuni File Data Platform is a suite of cloud-based services designed to enhance user productivity, ensure business continuity, provide data intelligence, offer cloud options, and simplify global infrastructure. This platform and its auxiliary services are projected to replace conventional file infrastructure such as network attached storage (NAS), backup, and Disaster Recovery (DR), with an expandable cloud-scale solution. By storing file data in scalable cloud object storage from multiple providers, Nasuni positions itself as a cloud-native alternative for traditional NAS and file server infrastructure. Based in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Nasuni serves sectors like manufacturing, construction, technology, oil and gas, financial services, and public sector worldwide, offering its services in more than 70 countries.

Reviews from Real Users

James J., IT Manager at a marketing services firm, says Nasuni’s management dashboard is helpful because he's able to view all of the different filers at once rather than check each one of them individually. He values the software’s security, reliability, good performance, helpful alerting, and responsive support.

According to a Server Engineering Services Lead at a mining and metals company, Nasuni offers good OR and DR capabilities, performs well, offers data security, and continuous file versioning helps recover from hardware failures.

The Managing Director of IT at a construction company appreciates Nasuni because it eliminates a lot of work that was previously done when managing backing up and restoring data files.

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital