HPE StoreEasy vs Nasuni comparison

Read 36 Nasuni reviews

7,412 Views
2,001 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE StoreEasy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Nasuni and HPE StoreEasy compete in the file storage solutions category. Nasuni has the upper hand due to its advanced features, scalability, and cloud adaptability.

Features: Nasuni offers features like global file locking, unlimited storage capacity, and continuous file versioning, appealing to businesses seeking scalable storage solutions. Users appreciate its simplicity in IT management, security, and disaster recovery capabilities. Nasuni also supports hybrid cloud environments, providing versatility for various deployment needs. HPE StoreEasy focuses on robust data protection and ease of implementation and maintenance, which appeals to users who prefer straightforward storage solutions that integrate easily with existing setups.

Room for Improvement: Nasuni could improve its platform with faster replication speeds and better cloud solutions support such as OneDrive. Users also suggest enhancements in user-friendliness, monitoring capabilities, and a clearer cache structure. HPE StoreEasy could benefit from increased scalability, better configuration tools, improved cluster services, and extended storage capabilities to cloud solutions like ISDN.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nasuni supports hybrid cloud, on-premises, and public cloud deployments, and its technical support is often praised for its proactive customer service despite some timing issues. HPE StoreEasy is typically deployed on-premises, preferred by companies seeking reliable on-premises setups and known for accessible and professional support.

Pricing and ROI: Nasuni's pricing includes per-terabyte licensing, cloud storage, and virtual machines, considered competitively priced. Users notice reduced capital expenses and labor costs, achieving ROI through infrastructure and maintenance savings. HPE StoreEasy's one-time purchase model is seen as economical, with satisfaction in its reliability and flexibility. Nasuni's model caters to businesses looking for scalable and cost-effective cloud adaptability, while StoreEasy is favored for predictable, one-time hardware investments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE StoreEasy vs. Nasuni Report (Updated: April 2026).

HPE StoreEasy vs. Nasuni

Download the complete report

Helped 892,776 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE StoreEasy

Ranking in NAS

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nasuni

Ranking in NAS

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (2nd), Cloud Migration (8th), Cloud Storage (13th), Cloud Backup (35th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (20th), Cloud Storage Gateways (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE StoreEasy is 3.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nasuni is 4.1%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE StoreEasy	3.2%
Nasuni	4.1%
Other	92.7%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Vinoth Bala

HPE Consultant at Mannai

Reliable, cost-effective, and easy to deploy and manage

I did not have any difficulties in deploying StoreEasy for the customers. It is user-friendly and easy to deploy. It has a Windows Server and a required license built in. For implementation, we follow the HPE documentation. We follow the Configuration guide and the Installation guide. For all HPE products, we follow the HPE documentation. For a single box, it takes a maximum of two days. It depends on the customer's availability. For different configurations, it can take two to three days. The number of people required varies from customer to customer, but generally, it requires three people. For mounting the storage, we always have three people to unbox, mount, and do other things. It does not require any maintenance. From the data center perspective, maintaining StoreEasy is very easy. No customer has complained about any difficulty in maintaining StoreEasy.

Read full review

SwapnilDaga

Infrastructure Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Cloud data management that achieves cost efficiency with advanced data protection features

I am currently using Nasuni for seismic data. We have a huge data size, and we want to reduce costs. Nasuni acts as a caching solution, so we put some data into the cache, and the rest goes to the blob, which helps us save on costs. We use it for applications like Petrol and Tech Log, where 3D…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's a hybrid entity, as I can use both the on-premises and cloud storage options."

"The most beneficial feature of HPE StoreEasy for us is its easy implementation and maintenance."

"I like the tool's provisioning feature and OneView."

"StoreEasy offers reliable file services, which is a critical factor for customers looking for solid infrastructure."

"We have just started with HPE StoreEasy but I am looking forward to working with it, as I am satisfied with the technical details and to me, it seems like one of the best solutions available."

"This solution allows me to better and more easily manage user data without impacting my primary storage."

"HPE StoreEasy is a stable and high-performing solution that HPE supports effectively."

"I like the user quotas, integrations, and separations for storage."

More HPE StoreEasy pros

"The most valuable feature is disaster recovery. We can fully recover a site in two hours."

"The feature I have found to be most valuable is the revision control of the files. If somebody deletes or accidentally makes a wrong change to files, we can go back to the revision history and restore the previous versions. That is a very good feature that we rely on."

"A big advantage is having the data exist in the cloud, which has certainly relieved a lot of pressure from our IT department in regards to having a backup as well as preventing some ransomware in all of our offices."

"We have less downtime and fewer trouble tickets from users who cannot access their shared files. Nasuni has reduced the friction and noise associated with file management because the devices are more reliable."

"Another helpful feature, in addition to restoring a file that was deleted within 24 to 48 hours, is that we have the ability to restore a file or a folder that was deleted, going all the way back to the inception of that file or folder. That means we actually have unlimited backups to the inception point of data with Nasuni."

"I particularly like the restore process. Our financial teams make changes to spreadsheets and other files, and we've got teams using Photoshop files. They make mistakes and need to recover files, and we can do that instantly. We also have users who manage to delete folders, and we can bring them back instantly within a few seconds."

"Nasuni has helped decrease capital costs by 66% since we don’t need to buy as much excess capacity."

"Its dependability and auditing capabilities are very important to us to be able to maintain a chain of custody of the information."

More Nasuni pros

Cons

"The areas of HPE StoreEasy that need improvement are scalability and migration."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

"It would be better if it were more scalable. In the next release, I would like to access some Microsoft Windows storage server features. I guess the newest version of Windows Server has some restrictions."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"The cluster service is not available in the latest version of HPE StoreEasy."

"We need some monitoring tools and it would be helpful if they were included."

"The support of HPE StoreEasy can improve its responsiveness. Dell support is better."

"There are some SKUs in StoreEasy that are built to order, and there are only limited options, such as StoreEasy 1670 and 1870, which can be configured to order based on customer preferences."

More HPE StoreEasy cons

"The performance monitoring could be improved."

"When we first set up our bandwidth limiting, we had a few problems when it came to managing it."

"I would like to see improvement in the training Nasuni provides. Compared to some of the other vendors out there, like Microsoft, where you can find how-to videos, Nasuni only has a lot of PDF documents that you have to go hunting for. It's workable, it certainly isn't a problem, but video walkthroughs would always be helpful."

"The Nasuni file storage platform doesn't work well when there are a high number of small files. This is the case when a directory structure contains more than 10,000 or 20,000 small files, e.g., 5 KB, 10 KB, or 15 KB. When the user is accessing these files from another geographical location, they might face a slow response or timeouts when connecting to the shares, and then to the files. This is because the file size is small. There is a scope of improvement with this solution when it comes to accessing a large number of small files."

"If you need performance with less latency, you should go with another solution."

"I would like to see them improve their tools in regards to accessing data using smartphones, tablets, and iPads."

"The user-friendliness of its access needs improvement. When I log into the console, I see all the files that we handle globally. There are hundreds of Nasuni files that I can see on the console, but no way that I can filter them down. While this is a small thing, I need to scroll down and select the ones that I want. "Control F" doesn't work nor is there a dropdown menu that I can click on and select the ones that I want."

"As administrators, we are used to having control equal to managing an on-prem device. In terms of log analysis and other things we want to do, Nasuni has some limitations limitation on what you do on the Nasuni. Nasuni could add some features to the GUI that make administration a little easier. It's tough when I have to move from one filter to another because there is no way to search it. We have to scroll up and down to find the name of it."

More Nasuni cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an economical solution for the company and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"Based on what I hear from our customers, it is not very expensive. From the cost perspective, I see nobody complaining about its cost."

"I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. You need to pay additional costs for the solution."

"The price of HPE StoreEasy is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and it is a one-time purchase. The price is similar to competitors, such as Dell."

"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage."

"It has a license fee as well as hardware costs, which we would incur if we want to use Nasuni Cloud Storage Gateway for upgrades."

"Its pricing can get a tad expensive. When we first took Nasuni out, we were just paying for the service. We got storage at a reduced rate. It has now changed, and they're now more of an all-in-one type of thing. It can be quite expensive, but it works out. Apart from that, licensing-wise, it's very simple."

"The cost is based on the capacity, which is approximately $100 USD per terabyte."

"Our agreement is set up such that we pay annually per terabyte, and we buy a chunk of it at a time. Then if we run out of space, we go back to them and buy another chunk."

"The pricing is on par with everybody else, and fair."

"Its price is fair and reasonable. I don't have anything negative about its pricing and licensing. For us, there is also the cost of monitoring. We are monitoring through Xenos and not through Nasuni. That is another cost for us from the monitoring perspective, but as far as Nasuni goes, we don't have any other cost apart from the licensing fee."

"There are cheaper forms of storage, but Nasuni is fairly priced for the functionality it offers. I can get basic file shares provisioned in Azure and pay for the storage and the CPU. The overall cost would be much less than Nasuni, but I would need to build the management console and encryption process, so it would cost a lot to develop that kind of functionality."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,776 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE StoreEasy?

HPE StoreEasy is competitively priced compared to competitors. It offers configuration options, such as different processor powers, to adapt to the client's needs.

What needs improvement with HPE StoreEasy?

The product is stable, running on Windows Server ( /products/windows-server-reviews ) with updates from HPE, including those for iLO. There could be improvements in providing more hardening options...

What is your primary use case for HPE StoreEasy?

I use HPE StoreEasy ( /products/hpe-storeeasy-reviews ) to provide file sharing to our business users. We are a logistics business, specifically a port.

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs HPE StoreEasy

Comparisons

Compared 33% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Scale-out NAS vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 8% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs HPE StoreEasy

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE StoreEasy Competitors

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 9% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 6% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Qumulo vs Nasuni

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Product Reports

NAS

Download HPE StoreEasy product report

Download Nasuni product report

Also Known As

HP StoreEasy

No data available

Overview

HPE StoreEasy provides storage and file sharing, offering ease of use, data protection, and scalable performance. It integrates well, is cost-effective, and supports on-premises and cloud storage. However, it needs better feature accessibility and scalability enhancements.

HPE StoreEasy is a versatile NAS storage solution known for its reliable file services and robust data protection features. It is favored for its ease of deployment and hybrid storage capabilities, catering to a range of storage needs from virtualization to backup purposes. The management console enables efficient control, while its integration with virtual machines enhances utility in dynamic IT environments. Despite its strengths, there are areas that require attention, like compatibility with various software and scalability improvements.

What are the core features of HPE StoreEasy?

Ease of Use: User-friendly interface for hassle-free management.
Data Duplication: Efficient data storage and retrieval.
VM Storage: Supports virtual machine data management.
User Quotas: Manages and limits storage per user.
Integration: Seamless connection with existing systems.
Data Protection: Advanced protection against data loss.
Snapshot Scheduling: Regularly captures system states.
Cloud Replication: Syncs data to cloud services.
Hybrid Storage: Combines on-premises and cloud solutions.

What are the benefits and ROI of HPE StoreEasy?

Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive price per terabyte ratio.
Scalability: Expandable hardware options for growing needs.
Management Efficiency: Centralized control through the console.
Reliability: Consistent performance for critical tasks.

HPE StoreEasy finds applications across different sectors, predominantly in NAS storage and file sharing. It supports logistics by maintaining separate user and server data, assists in virtualization, and solves capacity issues in data centers. Many enterprises use it as a robust alternative when current NAS systems face challenges.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Sample Customers

John Lewis, HPE IT, Comline AG, AmeriPride Services

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital

HPE StoreEasy vs. Nasuni