Microsoft Visual Studio Reviews

My primary business is designing architecture, and I use Visual Studio to demonstrate how to use VS code in the browser. For example, if someone has a business idea for a banking application and is starting to think about how to develop it, they can use Visual Studio to make a very quick prototype. The pipelines then deliver this project to the new environment, and the end-user can see how quickly the application works.

Visual Studio improves communication between teams, which saves valuable time.

The most valuable feature is the lightweight cross-platform support and the robust architecture. You can easily create, edit, and test any software and develop applications for all the major platforms, including cloud, desktop, and mobile.

Visual Studio could be improved with the ability to personalize the interface and development style and to edit extension requirements.

Visual Studio is a very good, very convenient, very powerful development solution. I would rate it as nine out of ten.

I use the product to develop software. 

The tool is good for interactive testing. It has good integrations and works well for remote services. The product also has features for collaborative work where it allows others to control my screen. It has a good community for every language. 

I have faced configuration issues with Microsoft Visual Studio. 

I have been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable. 

I would rate Microsoft Visual Studio's scalability an eight out of ten. 

I haven't reached out to the tool's support. 

Microsoft Visual Studio's setup is straightforward. It is easy to download the solution and you need to allow permissions depending on whether you are a Mac or Windows user.  

I use Microsoft Visual Studio's free version. 

I would rate the tool a nine out of ten. 

Our primary use case of this solution is for performance testing.

The feature I find most valuable is the fact that it's broad-spectrum, so it can be used for a wide variety of technologies. We are predominately .NET based and we use mostly .NET Core or .NET Framework so I can call in any immediate packages.

I would only say the deployment outline can be improved. We have shifted away from using Team Foundation Server, because it didn't work for our company. We shifted over to the Git approach and I do know that the Team Foundation Server has Git support. But we decided to rather go with GitLab as our main platform. 

In terms of more support I would like to have the ability to plug into other open source pools. I know that it's focused towards the whole Microsoft Suite so it's more geared towards the Team Foundation Server, but if they can add more support to pools, that would be great.

In terms of stability, it really works for us. There are drawbacks to every solution out there, it's built into it. Our company is stripped across using Visual Studio. Some of the architects use Visual Studio Code so they don't really need an extent of IDE. They have a nice cut of IDE using Visual Studio Code. In terms of stability, I don't think we have shifted away from Visual Studio at all. It will always remain our IDE tool of choice.

With Microservice Architecture it has become very easy for us to scale out. I think it's more about the way that we handle scale. The tool allows it. I would say the hardships comes with the planning for scale, as opposed to the actual tool accommodating itself. We have about 1500 users on Visual Studio and then we have a small team dedicated to the maintenance of the deployment. 

The technical team at Microsoft is known for their fast response time.

We utilized a bunch of templates for the initial setup instead of going through the trials and tribulations of setting up everything at once. 

I would highly recommend this solution. They've really gone the 9-mile to accommodate not only corporate or big companies, but small, single users to utilize the community issue or business vehicle, and to develop and build on application. I would highly recommend it to anyone. In the next version, I would like to see systems like Juta as well as more testing tools. There's a massive automation drive, anything in terms of more out of the box automation features for Selenium, or ACRONYM, or automation tools like that. I rate this program ten out of ten.

Microsoft Visual Studio is used for developing and typing code.

The most valuable features of Microsoft Visual Studio are the availability of many extensions, an interpreter, a code formator, and helpful dark and light modes.

The GUI of Microsoft Visual Studio could improve.

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio for approximately one year.

The performance of Microsoft Visual Studio is fine if you are using a high-level laptop. The solutions require a lot of RAM and other resources.

The scalability of Microsoft Visual Studio is good.

We have 300 to 400 users using this solution in my organization. We have plans to increase usage.

I have not contacted the support from Microsoft Visual Studio because our IT department looks after our support.

The initial setup of Microsoft Visual Studio is easy. The process takes approximately 15 to 20 minutes.

We did the implementation of Microsoft Visual Studio in-house.

I am using the free version of Microsoft Visual Studio.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio a nine out of ten.

Visual Studio is a tool used for custom software development. It covers everything under this umbrella, including architecture for automation testing. We have between 60 and 70 users working with Visual Studio.

I've been using Microsoft Visual Studio for 10 years.

Visual Studio is stable enough. There have been some issues but not very often. 

Visual Studio is a development environment. It only runs on one computer. Everyone has their own installation. If we talk about the cloud version, it's scalable. It has served our needs. We plan to increase usage by 5 to 10 percent as our departments grow. 

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio since .NET first came out. Prior to that, I used tools with other software development languages like Eclipse. Eclipse was an IDE-independent software vendor. 

Installing Visual Studio is easy on average. Sometimes you need to install various libraries, so it depends on your setup. I would say it's medium difficulty.

I rate Microsoft Visual Studio nine out of 10. 

I use the solution for React JavaScript applications front-end and Python coding.

We made the React front-end, which connects over JasperSoft, and this front-end was provided to customers while Jaspersoft was in the back-end, because customers want to have a proprietary design for themselves. The React front end was in Visual Studio Code.

The most valuable features are the extensions. Microsoft Visual Studio has a large community with different types of extensions.

I would like the solution to have a designing default in addition to the current coding default.

I have been using the solution for a few months.

I give the stability a ten out of ten.

I previously used Eclipse but it is not a very stable solution and it would crash sometimes. Microsoft Visual Studio has never crashed for me.

I give the initial setup a nine out of ten. We only need to download the file and follow the onscreen instructions.

The implementation is completed in-house.

I use the open-source version of Microsoft Visual Studio.

I give the solution a nine out of ten.

I am always on the lookout for open-source applications, but they are not always the best choice for organizations. It is usually more cost-effective to use open-source software as it requires fewer personnel to maintain it. Purchasing expensive software may be a better solution than open-source applications if more people are needed. Ultimately, the manager will decide what they want, but some open-source software can be less stable than Oracle, which is very expensive but also very stable. Although the solutions are free, they do not provide as many options and can not do certain things that Oracle can do.

Microsoft Visual Studio is easy to install and has a lot of extensions that we can use for different programming languages. The solution is very good, it's simple and free to use. I recommend Microsoft Visual Studio to everyone.

The ability to set up projects has been great. We can set up different types of projects. 

The integration with Azure is quite helpful.

The solution is stable.

The scalability is very good. 

It is a straightforward solution to set up. 

Technical support can be slow to respond at times. 

I've been using the solution for ten years now. 

It is a stable solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

The product can scale well. 

We have at least ten people on the solution right now. 

Technical support is okay. However, they are sometimes slow. We would like the product's support services to be quicker. 

Neutral

We found the initial setup to be straightforward and simple. I'd rate it a five or 4.5  out of five in terms of ease of deployment.

I'm not aware of the exact cost of the product. 

Our organization has a partnership with Microsoft.

I'd recommend the solution. It's a straightforward tool people can use to help develop solutions.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

We use Microsoft Visual Studio for application development and our customers.

I like the IDE or the integrated development environment. It's the best IDE.

IntelliSense could be better.

I have been using Microsoft Visual Studio for 20 years.

Stability is excellent.

Scalability is excellent. We have about 15 developers using this solution in our organization.

The initial setup was straightforward. It took less than 30 minutes to implement this solution.

We deployed this solution in-house. 

We have received a return on our investment.

Licensing costs are reasonable. 

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Visual Studio a ten.