Microsoft Visual Studio vs Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 comparison

Microsoft and Nexaweb are both solutions in the .NET Development Services category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Nexaweb is ranked #10. Microsoft holds a 11.8% mindshare in NDS, compared to Nexaweb’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Microsoft Visual Studio

Read 101 Microsoft Visual Studio reviews

1,132 Views
1,132 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0

81 Views
81 Comparison Views

Microsoft Visual Studio

Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Visual Studio and Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cognosys Inc Hardened Images, Harman and others in .NET Development Services.

To learn more, read our detailed .NET Development Services Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Visual Studio

Ranking in .NET Development Services

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

101

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0

Ranking in .NET Development Services

10th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the .NET Development Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Visual Studio is 11.8%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 is 3.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

.NET Development Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Visual Studio	11.8%
Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0	3.8%
Other	84.4%

.NET Development Services

Featured Reviews

Eitan Gold

SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

Test code efficiency improves with integrated debugger and automation

The test explorer is really important for us as it aids in testing, along with the regular debugger. Even though I forgot the term for it at the moment, there is an overall debugger tool within the IDE that is very effective. This comprehensive debugger tool does the job efficiently, making our work easier.

Read full review

Use Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which .NET Development Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	50

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Visual Studio?

The setup cost rates about eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Visual Studio?

I wish Microsoft Visual Studio was available on the Mac for improvement. I just wish it worked on the Mac.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Visual Studio?

My main use case for Microsoft Visual Studio is writing file processing code and backend APIs. A specific example of the kind of file processing or API work I do with Microsoft Visual Studio is pro...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ASP.NET vs Microsoft Visual Studio

Compared 100% of the time

More Microsoft Visual Studio Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Visual Studio

January 2026

Download Microsoft Visual Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

January 2026

Download Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 product report

Also Known As

MS Visual Studio

Enterprise Web 2.0

Overview

Visual Studio.NET is the umbrella that represents the key pieces of the .NET platform delivered from Microsoft, including the .NET Framework, the recently announced .NET Core, and a shared common layer of packages, compilers and runtime. Read this .NET blog post about the evolution of the platform and the different pieces that make .NET 2015.

Microsoft

The Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 platform has been used to modernize hundreds of client/server applications. It embraces open standards, is extensible and enables re-use. Furthermore, the Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 platform enables customers to develop distributed, interactive, rich applications that require outstanding reliability and performance, such as those in financial trading, order management, product configuration, and business-to-business self-service.

Nexaweb

Sample Customers

Knab, Hamburg Port Authority, Kecioren Municipality, National Instruments, Hamburg Port Authority, Government of Odisha, Kongsberg Maritime AS

Samsung, LG, Oracle, MetLife, Toyota, Hyundai, Sungard, Patagonia, Pepsico

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cognosys Inc Hardened Images, Harman and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.