Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user286848 - PeerSpot reviewer
Independent IT Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
The version we're using is not portal ready, but it has helped us save on manpower and cut down on process time.

What is most valuable?

It can automate back-end data processes.

How has it helped my organization?

It has helped us cut down process time and manpower.

What needs improvement?

The version we're using is not portal ready.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for about two years.

Buyer's Guide
MIMIX [EOL]
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about MIMIX [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

It was already set up when I joined.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has many service packs to fix issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It seems to be scalable in the newer versions.

How are customer service and support?

Customer Service:

It's above average.

Technical Support:

It's above average.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used it in conjunction with help systems and Connect:Direct.

What about the implementation team?

It was implemented in-house.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user91542 - PeerSpot reviewer
Architect at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Are you using iCluster and considering moving back to MIMIX?

IBM aquired Datamirror some years ago, then in 2012 IBM sold the ex-Datamiror product portfolio (iCluster) to RocketSoftware.

As far as logical replication HA solutions are concerned my impression is that the leader is Vision Solutions (who aquired Lakeview Solutions some years ago) with MIMIX both in terms of market share and in terms of solution and support quality, and in terms of being a visionary for logical replication HA solutions.

Our HA consultants have had experience both with iCluster and MIMIX products and their input thus far suggests that while iCluster is a fairly good HA choice, MIMIX Availability product line is superior when it comes to ease of use, functionality, reliability, customer support and consultant network. We have quite a few customers using MIMIX running heavy transaction workloads, and switchover time is no more than a couple of minutes. We also have customers with iCluster, but they are now thinking of returning to MIMIX.

There are of course other, hardware-based (and OS/400-based) HA solutions for iSeries (e.g. PowerHA SystemMirror) that are definitely worth considering, since over the years these hardware-based solutions have become more and more enhanced. Hardware-based HA solutions can be configured and managed somewhat simpler than logical HA replication solutions, but these may lack useful features logical replications do have (e.g. selective data replication).

Your best HA choice basically depends on multiple factors such as your current operations environment (amount of data to be replicated / change rate, distance and bandwidth between backup and production site), your existing hardware infrastructure (e.g. do you already have some kind of external storage?), existing skills of your staff and your Recovery Point Objective and Recovery Time Objective.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
MIMIX [EOL]
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about MIMIX [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Systems Analyst AS/400 with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
It works with different data groups.

What is most valuable?

  • Provides two servers
  • Easy
  • Fast
  • Robust

How has it helped my organization?

It's used in our new architecture, for production, HA/DR and it works with different data groups.

For how long have I used the solution?

I used it for one year, before I was using ITHERA.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

8/10.

Technical Support:

8/10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before we were using ITHERA. We switched because we had problems with the stability and had not found the right level of technical support.

How was the initial setup?

From watching the consultant, it looked easy.

What about the implementation team?

It was done by a consultant.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other options were evaluated.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user226431 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architecture & Infrastructure Program Manager Consultant
Vendor
It is fairly easy to add data groups and/or files to the intended replication group

What is most valuable?

The built-in remote journaling and the comparison tools.

How has it helped my organization?

We used it solely for IBM AS400 replication for disaster recovery/failover purposes.

What needs improvement?

Could make it easier to fix object errors.

For how long have I used the solution?

Six to seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Nothing out of what we expected for object replication.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No, fairly easy to add data groups and/or files to the intended replication group.

How are customer service and technical support?

A nine out of 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

At a previous installation, we used external storage for the AS/400 and did a complete hardware disaster recovery, which was a great DR strategy but provided very little HA.

How was the initial setup?

Can seem complex for new product users.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Just tell them you're looking at a hardware-based DR solution and they should come back with a lower cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No.

What other advice do I have?

Make sure you have at least two people learn it inside and out, so replication and object errors, when they occur, can be managed.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user280938 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems iSeries & HA administrator at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Its failover capabilities and ability to have no system downtime are valuable to us, but replication errors need to be resolved.

What is most valuable?

Failover capabilities is valuable.

How has it helped my organization?

  • No system downtime
  • High Availability (HA)

What needs improvement?

Replication errors need to be resolved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using it since 2005.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

It's fine.

Technical Support:

It's professional.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No previous solution used.

How was the initial setup?

It was quite easy.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it in-house.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other options evaluated.

What other advice do I have?

Buy the product, then roll it out as well.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user