Architect at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Simple install open source, but poor support for USB and OSx
What is most valuable?
· Bear metal simple install
· Runs on many different form factors- requires minimal
hardware but take advantage of super-computer. From a tiny media servers to huge enterprise machines.
· No CPU or memory restrictions
· Many media options – local, iscsi, NFS, etc.
· Run full virtualization and container based virtualization
simultaneously (OpenVZ and KVM)
· Intuitive web managed interface
· Many enterprise advanced features
· Free commercial use allowed
· Open source with very active community
· Large repository of open source easy to download pre-made container images that go from hyperlinks to VMs in minutes.
What needs improvement?
· MS windows performance
· Immature VDI
· Poor USB handling
· Poor support for OSx
· commercial support options
· GUI interface stability (v2.0)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Sub-director with 51-200 employees
A complete and stable solution with good tools for managing the servers
Pros and Cons
- "The whole solution is good. It has good tools that help me in managing the servers. It is also stable."
- "It is a good solution, but it is very complicated in some ways. It is not easy. You must have experience in the console mode to do some configurations. A lot of documentation and YouTube videos are available that you can use to learn about it."
What is our primary use case?
I am using this solution for the virtualization of many servers. I have its latest version.
What is most valuable?
The whole solution is good. It has good tools that help me in managing the servers. It is also stable.
What needs improvement?
It is a good solution, but it is very complicated in some ways. It is not easy. You must have experience in the console mode to do some configurations. A lot of documentation and YouTube videos are available that you can use to learn about it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have not scaled it. What I have covers all my needs. In two or three years, I will see if I need to scale it.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have local technical support, and it is excellent.
How was the initial setup?
It is complicated to set up. It took us one week.
What other advice do I have?
For implementing this solution, you must have technical support.
I would rate Proxmox VE a 10 out of 10. It is an excellent and complete solution. I really like it.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Proxmox VE
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Proxmox VE. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
System Administrator at I-net globalindo
An inexpensive solution that offers easy integrations and has good stability
Pros and Cons
- "The solution allows for easy integrations."
- "The solution needs a better billing system."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for some websites and applications.
What is most valuable?
The solution allows for easy integrations.
What needs improvement?
The solution needs a better billing system.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
How are customer service and technical support?
We buy support from Proxmox.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We currently use a mix of solutions, so we haven't just switched from one to another. We also use VMware and OpenStack.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was complex. We took about a month to fully deploy the solution.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the implementation ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution isn't expensive. It's cheap for us.
What other advice do I have?
We use the hybrid cloud deployment model.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Jefe de Servicio de Ciberseguridad at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Open-source, feature-rich, stable, and easy to install
Pros and Cons
- "There are many features included with Proxmox."
- "The facility of deployment is an area that needs to improve."
What is our primary use case?
We are implementers and we implement solutions for our customers.
We tested Proxmox VE as a solution to build our applications
What is most valuable?
There are many features included with Proxmox.
What needs improvement?
The facility of deployment is an area that needs to improve.
The support is an area in need of improvement.
I would like to see support for other container technologies such as Kubernetes, as well as other platforms.
If they had local container support, it would be very good for Proxmox.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 10 people in our organization who are using this solution.
We have plans to increase our usage.
How are customer service and technical support?
They provide medium level support. Support needs improvement.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we were using VMware vSphere. We went with Proxmox because of the price and the features.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. It was very simple.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It's an open-source solution that can be used free of cost.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Administrator at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Performs well with Windows but lacks Mac support due to Mac's EULA
With respect to some of the cons, Proxmox VE performs well enough with Windows if you use KVM's virtio devices in lieu of emulated hardware. However, the freely available virtio drivers are not WHQL-certified, which produces annoying error messages when you attempt to load them.
With respect to the lack of Mac OS X support, a large part of this is due to Apple's terms of use for OS X. I can't really blame Proxmox or the KVM folks for not pursuing Mac OS X support since doing so would violate Mac OS X's EULA and could potentially get them or their customers sued.
Lastly, I can't say that I've ever had any stability issues with the Proxmox VE web interface, but using the graphical console can be a struggle. I don't think I've gotten it to work in anything except Mozilla Firefox.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The setup is straightforward and it has no stability issues
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup was really straightforward and easy."
- "The virtualization can be better."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for Linux servers and contain our VM operating system servers.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see an improvement in the virtualization itself. We use the physical servers for easier migrations, but the virtualization can be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Proxmox VE for two to three years now on premise.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable.
How are customer service and technical support?
We haven't subscribed for technical support, so I can't tell you if they are good or not.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was really straightforward and easy.
What other advice do I have?
If I have to rate this solution, I will give it an eight out of ten. In the next version I would like to see differential packages. This version does not include that, so we have to use a third party or an opensource. Whenever we want to write a large, 500 gigabyte script to do differential packages for Proxmox VM, it is difficult to take a full package every day. So if that feature could be added in the future, it would be great.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Proxmox VE Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Server Virtualization SoftwarePopular Comparisons
VMware vSphere
Hyper-V
Oracle VM VirtualBox
Oracle VM
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Citrix XenServer
IBM PowerVM
oVirt
OpenVZ
XCP-ng virtualization platform
ISPsystem VMmanager
Odin Virtuozzo Containers
VMware ESXi
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Proxmox VE Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Proxmox vs ESXi/vSphere: What is your experience?
- What are the main differences between Proxmox versus VMware vSphere?
- Proxmox VE or KVM?
- What is the biggest difference between Proxmox VE and XenServer?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using Proxmox versus ESXi 6.5?
- How does Proxmox VE compare with Oracle VM VirtualBox?
- How does Proxmox VE compare with Hyper-V?
- How does Proxmox VE compare with Oracle VM VirtualBox?
- When evaluating Server Virtualization Software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- VMware ESXi or VMware Workstation?
About one of the cons of Proxmox VE: What's with the performance of MS windows that is not good?