Qualys Web Application Scanning Reviews

Our customers use the solution to audit their web-application before releasing them to the Internet.

Licensing is the most valuable. Qualys provides the best licensing for companies. It is the best product for the development purposes of web applications. The product has a lot of integrations.

The product should allow users to upload their payloads.

I have been using the solution for three years.

I rate the product’s stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the product’s scalability a nine out of ten. 

We did not face any issues while deploying the solution. The product provides good documentation for deployment.

The product has a very good licensing model.

I am using the latest version of the solution.

Tenable makes us wait 90 days to delete the test web application, and Rapid7 does not allow us to delete it as well as  Acunetix (once a year).
I will recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the platform for vulnerability management and website testing. It helps us identify and remediate web-based vulnerabilities in our applications, ensuring their security from potential attackers.

The solution offers several valuable features. It crawls through all pages quickly and provides fewer false positives than other tools. Additionally, the support team is highly responsive and supportive, addressing any issues promptly.

One area for improvement is the user interface. The new UI, which was recently upgraded, feels more complex and less user-friendly than the old version. However, as we continue to use it, we anticipate becoming more accustomed to it. 

Additionally, improved scan scheduling options are needed, which Qualys is working on implementing.

We have been using Qualys Web Application Scanning for five years.

Although we have encountered a few bugs over the past two years, they have been addressed effectively.

I rate the stability an eight. 

The product is scalable. 

The support team is very effective and responsive.

Positive

We previously used HCL AppScan. We switched to Qualys primarily because of its superior customer support and responsiveness.

The initial deployment was straightforward. Switching from HCL AppScan to the Qualys solution took approximately six to eight months, including the planning and actual migration.

It does not require significant maintenance. We typically raise two to three cases monthly with the support team, who promptly address them. Otherwise, there are no regular maintenance tasks.

While I cannot provide an exact number of hours saved, the automation has reduced the time required for scanning and scheduling tasks by about 70% compared to our previous process.

Over the past five years, we have observed a significant reduction in the failure rate of web applications, from 20% to 2%.

The product pricing is fair and reasonably priced.

We implemented the platform to identify web-based vulnerabilities in our applications, allowing us to address these issues proactively. It helps protect our web applications from potential attackers and secure them against loopholes.

Automated scanning has significantly improved our web application security management by reducing manual work. It has also streamlined the process, saving us considerable time. Previously, scheduling scans for many applications would take about a week, but automation makes this process much quicker and more efficient.

Regarding incident reduction, we have seen about a 20 % decrease. Cost-wise, there has been no significant difference compared to our previous tool. However, the speed of response and reduced false positives have been valuable.

I would recommend it to others for its excellent customer support, scanning efficiency, and scalability. It is a reliable tool for managing web application security.

Overall, I rate it an eight. 

We have been using Qualys Web Application Scanning for automated web architecture scanning in an enterprise environment.

The solution integrates well with our database and asset management, providing a detailed framework that connects products and shares knowledge across them.

The most valuable features are the scheduled scanning, detailed reports, asset management, the knowledge database, and the overall product framework. The integration with other tools is also a significant advantage.

The authenticated scanning feature could be improved by adding support for real-time scanning tokens and authorization tokens. For example, after sessions, having tokens valid for applications allowing automated authenticated scanning, similar to what Burp offers with proxy support, would be beneficial.

The enterprise-level deployment was scalable and supported our business growth well.

We were looking at alternatives like Burp and Acunetix, particularly from the security research side, for better results and accuracy.

Pricing is a significant consideration. Although the product is good for certain details and automated processes, it may not be as cost-effective for some tasks.

We evaluated other solutions like Burp and Acunetix.

For specific web applications, Burp may provide better results, however, for integration of tools, Qualys Web Application Scanning is a good choice.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use the solution for scanning and vulnerability management.

The product prevents possible vulnerabilities in our network.

It will be good if Qualys is integrated with QRadar.

I have been using the solution for three years.

The tool is stable.

The tool is scalable since it is on the cloud. We have 60 users.

The support is moderately good. Sometimes, the team responds on time. Sometimes, it takes time. The support could be faster.

I have used many other tools. In some cases, I prefer other tools because they give better visibility into the vulnerabilities. In general, Qualys is good.

The initial setup was super easy because it is cloud-based. We use it internally. The installation took two days. We had to improve the tools and create the tags and assets. Two or three engineers can deploy the product. The product is easy to maintain.

I integrate Qualys and QRadar. QRadar is for SCM. It helps centralize the management of the network. It provides good visibility of Qualys. Qualys is a good product. There are better tools in the market. However, I recommend Qualys to others. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

The primary use case includes scanning the web applications that are public facing.

The Qualys Web Application Scanning solution offers a single comprehensive console and consolidated reporting, covering all aspects from on-prem to cloud and compliance, etcetera.

There should be better visibility into the application. 

Our customers have been using this solution for more than three years now.

It is a stable solution.

It is a cloud-based solution, so it is easy to scale. 

We work with enterprise-level clients with over 2500 endpoints. 

The customer service and support are good.

Positive

I would say Qualys is on the better side. It's more about the performance and the quality of the product because it's been around for a long time.

The initial setup is easy. 

The time taken for implementation depends on the customer's environment. It could take around a month, depending on the module. 

We have a team of two to three people to implement at the enterprise level. Moreover, it is easy to maintain. 

We normally purchase an annual license. There are additional costs. From Qualys, it's for the license and maintenance, which includes patches and stuff like that. Additionally, we have our own service delivery costs.

I'm familiar with all of the Qualys-based products because we partner with Qualys, so I have a local contact in New Zealand who helps me with all the technical information.

Moreover, I'm a pre-sales specialist, so I recommend the solution to our potential customers and then we implement through another team for customers.

Qualys is a stable and reliable solution. It has been around for a long time.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. There is scope for improvement. It is still an early technology. 

I think we have the fastest version, and they always upgrade it. I think it's the $2 or $3-a-month version. They have multiple engines inside it, but it's a site-based service. It is not on-demand, so Qualys will host it. It's the pay as you go service that is on the software-as-a-service. 

We use the DAST, dynamic application scan test.

The feature that I have found most valuable is the progressive scan. It is good. It's done in 24 hours.

One area that could be improved is the a data server. That's probably what I most noticed in comparison with the Rapid7. Also, the UI is not user-friendly and you don't have a yearly reporting facility where you can slice and dice in different jobs. This is not good. 

Additionally, you don't have a recording feature, where you can record your screen navigation. Like a macro, you want to create the full screen, and they don't provide a tool which can record your navigation and then do a replay.

In terms of what should be included in the next release, like I mentioned, just the UI, the user interface screen. Also, it would be good If they could improve and enrich the reports. These are the fundamental differences with Rapid7.

I have been using Qualys Web Application Scanning for five years.

Qualys Web Application Scanning is very stable and reliable. But the reporting does not look that great.

In terms of scalability, it is very easy to expand. It's very fast and visible.

We don't have many people working on the solution. But our applications are big applications. We are using six components in different applications.

Support is very good.

Because of tasking, the initial setup is very straightforward. We didn't have to purchase any hardware for the installation. It is task-based. The cloud provision is there. It is good. I think nowadays everyone is going with the cloud provisioning. That way you can subscribe for any number of years to use the software. 

I think the initial setup took a couple of hours because there were no plugins and nothing to be installed.

We implemented it ourselves and there was no installation expert here.

Yes, we are still comparing it with Rapid7. We want to first make assessments of what advantages we can get with Rapid7.

My advice for anyone considering this solution is, "Go for it." 

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Qualys Web Application Scanning a seven.

My main use of Qualys WAS is for multifactor authentication for web and mobile applications.

Qualys WAS' most valuable features are the navigation flow of the UI and the option for a different layer of security (identification and operation through email and mobile).

Sometimes the response time is low because the handshake fails, and then you have to re-login and start again. In the next release, Qualys should include more integration with different applications and single-sign-on protocol.

I've been using Qualys Web Application Scanning for a year and a half.

Qualys WAS is stable unless we have a breach.

Qualys WAS is scalable.

Qualys' technical support is good but could improve its resolution speed.

Positive

Previously, I used CA Identity Solutions by Broadcom, which had easier integration, more options for MFA, and biometric options.

The initial setup was complex and took about three months to deploy. I would rate the setup experience as four out of five.

We used a vendor team.

Qualys WAS' pricing is competitive.

I would recommend getting the POC done before implementing WAS, especially if there will be a lot of APIs involved in developing the product. Look at how the endpoint security works when the APIs run with a different channel, like web and mobile applications. I would give Qualys WAS a rating of six out of ten.

We use the solution alongside others for static scanning. It's used for endpoint scanning. 

The monitor's ability to read the reports, or to do very detailed reports is great. It's good at looking at the different vulnerabilities. Rarely are there security loopholes. It can also suggest ways to mitigate risks and vulnerabilities. 

There's a lot of great reference material. 

The integration is great. It works with many different products. 

There could be better management and faster scanning. An application may have a lot of URLs and complexity. If there are a couple of applications, that complexity multiplies. It can take three or four days to scan. That's too long. It should be maybe three or four hours. 

We've been using the solution for two years. 

It's a stable product. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. The solution is reliable. 

It leverages the cloud. One of the upsides of that is the scalability that is possible. 

We have about 500 to 600 people on the solution currently.

Technical support is very good whenever we send them a message. They will schedule a call and then they will check in with us until the issue's resolved or until we understand the entire problem and they clarify issues. They're very quick as well.

The initial setup, due to the fact that it is the cloud, is very easy. It's a SaaS solution. We don't have to install anything in order to get going. You are on it right away. There is no deployment time to get through. 

Since it's so quick and immediate, you don't need a big team to get it of the ground. 

We were able to handle the implementation ourselves. It's not hard. You don't need consultants or integrators.

We have seen an ROI and my understanding is that it is pretty good. 

I don't directly deal with the licensing aspect of the product. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. We haven't had any issues after two years of working with it. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.