Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user327960 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager, Software Test Engineering with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
It uses standard scripting language, giving us the flexibility to extend the functionality of WebLOAD using industry standard libraries.

What is most valuable?

The features that I really appreciate the most are the use of a standard scripting language, JavaScript. I find the ease of use and the flexibility of the JavaScript standard to be one of the leading features of the tool. It gives us a lot of flexibility to extend the functionality of Webload using industry standard libraries. So that flexibility, and the use of a standard scripting language, are some of the number one features.

What needs improvement?

We’re working with Radview to make it a 10; they are very receptive to all of our suggestions for improvement. They can improve in the reporting - the ability to generate custom reports. It may be that we don’t know enough, but certainly the data is there.

For how long have I used the solution?

Personally, I have used the solution for two and half years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

Buyer's Guide
RadView WebLOAD
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about RadView WebLOAD. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and support?

They are the best of all of the vendors I deal with, hands down. They are there when we need them. I couldn’t ask for anything more.

How was the initial setup?

We deploy it quite frequently with current integrations. We use the integration with Amazon Web Services very frequently with the standup of additional which makes capacity very easy within the tool. As it integrates very easily with AWS, it allows the creating of load generators on demand, and then tearing them down after, so we can save on cost.

What about the implementation team?

It was done in-house. We used the Radview training services. It was very well done, we were pleased. The integrations don’t require Radview’s services. They have very good tutorials online, and the intensive training they provided was great.

What was our ROI?

There has been an ROI, as since we implemented a more robust performance testing program on our own products, our customer’s satisfaction has increased. That’s how I would measure the value.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

They are more than competitive; they are hands down better than their competitors. It’s just a better product, so it’s a no brainer.

What other advice do I have?

I think that we have a very good working relationship. They are very responsive to our needs, if that be support or implementation of new features. One of the things I have enjoyed the most is being able to influence the features implemented. They ask for feature requests and things we may need and they have acted upon those and given us additional features. The relationship has been very good, no issues whatsoever.

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're community partners.
PeerSpot user