I primarily use ReadyAPI to convert APIs into functional test cases and to manage customer information.
Lead Test Engineer at Strategy Compass
User-friendly, fast, and good with customer data
Pros and Cons
- "ReadyAPI's best features are user-friendliness, smooth integration with Postman, the speed of creating test cases, and integration with customer data."
- "ReadyAPI's customer support isn't that great, particularly their response time."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
ReadyAPI's best features are user-friendliness, smooth integration with Postman, the speed of creating test cases, and integration with customer data.
What needs improvement?
An improvement for ReadyAPI would be automated import/export with third-party tools. It can also be hard for new testers to learn.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using ReadyAPI for six months.
Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about ReadyAPI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
ReadyAPI is stable.
How are customer service and support?
ReadyAPI's customer support isn't that great, particularly their response time.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
ReadyAPI requires a product license and a subscription, which is renewable every year or three years. Its pricing is very reasonable, unlike more expensive competitors like Tosca, XPlant, or Catalon.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise anybody thinking of implementing ReadyAPI to install the trial version and go through the tutorial so that they can learn how the solution works. I would rate ReadyAPI as eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Very easy to automate for data-driven testing and simple to integrate
Pros and Cons
- "It's easy to automate for more data-driven testing."
- "The UI is not user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case of ReadyAPI is as a testing tool for mock data testing. I'm a technical consultant and we are customers of this solution.
What is most valuable?
I like that it's easy to automate within our deployment and to have the ability for more data-driven testing. ReadyAPI is also easy to integrate.
What needs improvement?
I would ideally like to see a more user-friendly UI to replace what is currently there. Secondly, we never know when there's going to be a license upgrade and it would be helpful to receive an automated email prior to license expiry or some kind of auto-enabled system for license upgrades to give us an alert or some kind of notification before the license expires.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I think scaling up and down is possible. There are 10 users of this solution in my team but there would be many others throughout the company. We only use the solution for certain projects so it's not used on a daily basis.
How are customer service and support?
The customer support is good; they are very knowledgeable and they respond quickly. I was quite impressed.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What other advice do I have?
I would advise anyone considering implementing this solution to look at the Smartbear documentation on ReadyAPI in order to explore new ways to implement it according to customer requirements and to understand how the product operates.
I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about ReadyAPI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Useful data-driven testing, reliable, and straightforward deployment
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup of ReadyAPI is straightforward."
- "ReadyAPI could improve by having dynamic validation information."
What is our primary use case?
I use ReadyAPI for API and data-driven testing. You can run your APIs through a loop.
How has it helped my organization?
ReadyAPI is a QA testing tool. We were able to catch many bugs because we could inject various scenarios running through our data-driven testing. This improves the quality of our products.
What needs improvement?
ReadyAPI could improve by having dynamic validation information.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using ReadyAPI for approximately eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
ReadyAPI is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of ReadyAPI is good. However, every one of the 20 QA team members uses it independently.
How are customer service and support?
The support from ReadyAPI is very good.
I rate the support from ReadyAPI a four out of five.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of ReadyAPI is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
The IT team members can install the solution themself.
What was our ROI?
We have received a return on investment using ReadyAPI.
What other advice do I have?
Our IT team does the maintenance of the solution.
I would recommend others try out the solution to see if it fits their needs.
I rate ReadyAPI a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
API testing and management solution used to build and run a number of tests simultaneously
Pros and Cons
- "This solution is very intuitive. Once you finish your first few testing cases, you can change several parameters and create lots of testing cases. You could use the same testing cases for different purposes such as automation, performance and screen testing."
- "Many users will consider this solution expensive compared to the layout. It is more expensive than other solutions."
What is our primary use case?
We use ReadyAPI to build our own testing cases. We are able to use the same testing cases to complete automation tests, performance test team and security tests at the same time.
What is most valuable?
This solution is very intuitive. Once you finish your first few testing cases, you can change several parameters and create lots of testing cases. You could use the same testing cases for different purposes such as automation, performance and screen testing.
What needs improvement?
Many users will consider this solution expensive compared to the layout. It is more expensive than other solutions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used this solution for a year and a half.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
This is a lot of documentation provided for support but they still need some important information to be added. For this reason, I check other communities discussions and forums.
I would rate the support team a six out of ten because they haven't always been able to solve my issue.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
It is easy to install, but it takes time to set up your testing environment. You need to figure out how your API works and save the mutual authentications. You need to know the specification of your API partner and this takes time. It is not difficult to maintain.
What about the implementation team?
I introduced the solution to my previous company. I just read the documentation and then got started.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is more expensive than other API testing tools. For example, Postman is an open source tool and is free to use. ReadyAPI is a commercial tool and licenses. need to be purchased. It costs approximately $200 000 Taiwan Dollars for three years.
I would rate the pricing a six out of ten.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have used Postman before, but not for a long time. I definitely prefer ReadyAPI. It is very easy to use and it's very easy to learn. They also offer online virtual training and certifications.
What other advice do I have?
The documentation provided is good but it could be more comprehensive.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Test Manager at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Simple to use and the integration with Jenkins is helpful
Pros and Cons
- "The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them."
- "I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution."
What is our primary use case?
I am a test manager, and we have testers who are experts with these tools. We primarily use this solution for API testing and integration. We have an on-premises deployment.
What is most valuable?
The training for this solution is very good. The integration with Jenkins is good.
The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them.
Overall, the process is simple.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution.
The reporting needs to be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for about eighteen months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Some versions of the software have had bugs, but in general, it is quite stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scaling this solution is quite easy. I had some problems migrating to the cloud, with Java, but overall it is easy.
We have about twenty users for this solution, although it depends on the project. Some projects have fewer users.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have not needed to contact technical support.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Consultant at Hexagon Capability Center India
A great project management feature, easy to install, but is challenging to update
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is straightforward."
- "It is challenging doing upgrades and patches because sometimes the environmental variables or suits in the projects get erased."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case is for APIs and API testing.
What is most valuable?
The feature I find valuable is project management. It allows us to organize our test cases and suits inside the project. It also gives the ability to store the variables in terms of properties so they can be used across test cases and test suits, so they can be placed at the project level or test suit level, or test case level.
What needs improvement?
It is challenging doing upgrades and patches because sometimes the environmental variables or suits in the projects get erased. The solution can be improved by adding redundancy to protect the data from being erased. I would like to have the database integration like using the JDVC improved. The last thing would be a more user-friendly way to update the definition and refactor the definitions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for three and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution has met our requirements and appears to be scalable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. I give it an eight out of ten for simplicity.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing the solution I evaluated Postman. The selling point for the solution over Postman is the project management features.
What other advice do I have?
I give the solution a seven out of ten.
I manage a testing team made up of four people including myself that use the solution daily.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Software Development Engineer in Test at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
User-friendly and flexible solution
Pros and Cons
- "ReadyAPI's best features are that it's user-friendly and its behavior-driven development is flexible."
- "Areas for improvement include the security files, endpoints, and process sessions."
What is most valuable?
ReadyAPI's best features are that it's user-friendly and its behavior-driven development is flexible.
What needs improvement?
Areas for improvement include the security files, endpoints, and process sessions. ReadyAPI should also include the ability to add and modify existing files.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using ReadyAPI for almost fifteen years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
ReadyAPI is stable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward for anybody with experience.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
ReadyAPI is moderately priced, with added costs for more plugins.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate ReadyAPI eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Development team leader / APPR at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Stable, scalable, and helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "When we are doing API testing we have found it to be very efficient to receive results. Additionally, you are able to do tests directly from the API."
- "The initial setup could be less complex."
What is our primary use case?
We use ReadyAPI for testing APIs.
What is most valuable?
When we are doing API testing we have found it to be very efficient to receive results. Additionally, you are able to do tests directly from the API.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used ReadyAPI within the past 12 months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have found ReadyAPI scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I have used the support and they assisted us with a problem which they resolved.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used TestComplete.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup could be less complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of the solution has been fine.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to anyone who wants to do API testing, this solution is easy to use.
I rate ReadyAPI an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ReadyAPI Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Popular Comparisons
Tricentis Tosca
Apache JMeter
Katalon Studio
OpenText UFT One
SmartBear TestComplete
Selenium HQ
Tricentis NeoLoad
Sauce Labs
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
BlazeMeter
Eggplant Test
Ranorex Studio
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise
ReadyAPI Test
Qt Squish
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ReadyAPI Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
- Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?
- What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?
- What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?
- When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?
- Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?
- Specflow vs Selenium
- IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server versus CA Service Virtualization?