I primarily use ReadyAPI to convert APIs into functional test cases and to manage customer information.
Test Automation Specialist at Accenture
User-friendly, fast, and good with customer data
Pros and Cons
- "ReadyAPI's best features are user-friendliness, smooth integration with Postman, the speed of creating test cases, and integration with customer data."
- "ReadyAPI's customer support isn't that great, particularly their response time."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
ReadyAPI's best features are user-friendliness, smooth integration with Postman, the speed of creating test cases, and integration with customer data.
What needs improvement?
An improvement for ReadyAPI would be automated import/export with third-party tools. It can also be hard for new testers to learn.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using ReadyAPI for six months.
Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI
February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d09a/3d09ae4d87808101515aff47a788c8a5df4338de" alt="PeerSpot Buyer's Guide"
Learn what your peers think about ReadyAPI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
ReadyAPI is stable.
How are customer service and support?
ReadyAPI's customer support isn't that great, particularly their response time.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
ReadyAPI requires a product license and a subscription, which is renewable every year or three years. Its pricing is very reasonable, unlike more expensive competitors like Tosca, XPlant, or Catalon.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise anybody thinking of implementing ReadyAPI to install the trial version and go through the tutorial so that they can learn how the solution works. I would rate ReadyAPI as eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90183/9018307dff0f8424d9744886ad50d7f0f7915caf" alt="PeerSpot user"
Program Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools
Pros and Cons
- "It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools."
- "The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case of this solution is to test services to have an understanding of what the request to the service should be and the response. We also use it for performance tests.
What is most valuable?
It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools. You can see tests locally and then you can upload them through a type of digital environment and then they will be implemented, executed, built and deployed. That it is really convenient.
What needs improvement?
The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable. Even if crashes happen, it is very seldom.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is actually another really useful and convenient function of this software. It has the ability to pass tests on different machines. You need to have a kind of server on a machine. Then you can instal clients from the other machines and then the application does tests on different machines. It's really convenient as well.
It's used on a daily basis.
How are customer service and technical support?
Their support can be a bit slow.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was quite easy, it wasn't a problem at all. It took around half an hour to set up.
What other advice do I have?
The main advantage is that it could be integrated into different CI/CD tools. That is something that is really valuable and helpful.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
In the next release, they should make the ability to extend different functions a bit easier. We extend some functionalities and it's possible to extend the functionalities because you have the ability to add many interesting pieces by yourself to that API but it's not so easy. It would really help if they improved that.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI
February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d09a/3d09ae4d87808101515aff47a788c8a5df4338de" alt="PeerSpot Buyer's Guide"
Learn what your peers think about ReadyAPI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Test Manager at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Simple to use and the integration with Jenkins is helpful
Pros and Cons
- "The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them."
- "I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution."
What is our primary use case?
I am a test manager, and we have testers who are experts with these tools. We primarily use this solution for API testing and integration. We have an on-premises deployment.
What is most valuable?
The training for this solution is very good. The integration with Jenkins is good.
The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them.
Overall, the process is simple.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see a better dashboard for monitoring in the next release of this solution.
The reporting needs to be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for about eighteen months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Some versions of the software have had bugs, but in general, it is quite stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scaling this solution is quite easy. I had some problems migrating to the cloud, with Java, but overall it is easy.
We have about twenty users for this solution, although it depends on the project. Some projects have fewer users.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have not needed to contact technical support.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Useful data-driven testing, reliable, and straightforward deployment
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup of ReadyAPI is straightforward."
- "ReadyAPI could improve by having dynamic validation information."
What is our primary use case?
I use ReadyAPI for API and data-driven testing. You can run your APIs through a loop.
How has it helped my organization?
ReadyAPI is a QA testing tool. We were able to catch many bugs because we could inject various scenarios running through our data-driven testing. This improves the quality of our products.
What needs improvement?
ReadyAPI could improve by having dynamic validation information.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using ReadyAPI for approximately eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
ReadyAPI is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of ReadyAPI is good. However, every one of the 20 QA team members uses it independently.
How are customer service and support?
The support from ReadyAPI is very good.
I rate the support from ReadyAPI a four out of five.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of ReadyAPI is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
The IT team members can install the solution themself.
What was our ROI?
We have received a return on investment using ReadyAPI.
What other advice do I have?
Our IT team does the maintenance of the solution.
I would recommend others try out the solution to see if it fits their needs.
I rate ReadyAPI a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90183/9018307dff0f8424d9744886ad50d7f0f7915caf" alt="PeerSpot user"
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ReadyAPI Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Popular Comparisons
Apache JMeter
Tricentis NeoLoad
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
BlazeMeter
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Appvance AIQ Platform
ReadyAPI Performance
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ReadyAPI Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
- Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?
- What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?
- What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?
- When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?
- Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?
- Specflow vs Selenium
- What are the best performance testing tools?