Toad Data Modeler Reviews

I find the script/text editing feature most valuable, as well as the ability to run scripts of any size against databases.

It saves time by allowing automated, as opposed to manual, data entry into databases.

I have used the product for about three years in total, at two different employers.

The issues I had in installation were due to database access restrictions.

It was straightforward from the software side.

I had the software implemented through in-house teams.

It is a very good option for creating and editing SQL scripts, especially large ones that I have run in support of government billing applications.

• Ability to save my custom queries and Macros
• Faster connectivity to databases than a SQL developer

UI/UX can be improved according to functionality.

I've used it for eight to nine months.

There were issues due to the databases connectivity.

No issues encountered.

I worked in a pre-deployed environment.

It was done by my employer's in-house IT team.

Running queries, because that's kinda important.

It hasn't.

The IDE is slow and, now, very buggy, Autocomplete being especially bad.

Years.

Lots.

Probably, but that's a big question.

Poor.

Yes. I switched because SQL Developer was still in its infancy.

Complex. Despite requiring a key which only allows specific features, the installer still asks you to select all the features (from a big list), instead of hiding what you cannot have.

It's way overpriced, even if it wasn't the buggy product it has become. Honestly, Toad for Oracle needs to die; SQL Developer is much better than it was.

Yes, SQL Developer, Tora, SQL Plus.

Don't, really don't.