Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Badges

20 Points
4 Years

User Activity

Over 4 years ago
This has evolved over time as unified communications has evolved. To really be accurate it should be done with a solution that uses packets as its data-source. This is really a not a good play for NetFlow or SNMP polling and traps. Some log companies will also throw their…
Over 4 years ago
There is actually a place and a need for both synthetic and real user experience monitoring. If you look at the question from the point of view of what you trying to learn, detect, & then investigate, the answer should be that you want to be pro-active in ensuring a positive…
Over 4 years ago
That proactive baseline AI or ML or whatever learning piece, is always the gold that seems hard to find even in products that say they have it. We got something put together in Splunk but it was work. Our NetScout stuff had it but we did not know it was built in until…
Over 4 years ago
I have seen NetScout has a proactive predictive alerting and view capability. We liked that it could do these individually by what they call SERVICES that is a grouping of things like URL and Database Names and Middleware transactions sort of like by company application or…
Over 4 years ago
I also liked the Dynatrace feature. I have noticed that NetScout has added the same mathematics for predictive and baseline and also anomaly detection for volume and number of transactions and transaction types like GET or PUT or whatever for HTTP and similar for databases…

Answers

Over 4 years ago
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Comments

Over 4 years ago
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Over 4 years ago
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability