Support many different databases too with help of 3rd part vendors like DB Protection

Very good review We backup PostgreSQL with DB Protection for PostgreSQL using IBM Spectrum Protect

Thanks for a good review Many developers wants to have micro servers with micro sized databases. But that doesn't necessarily means that these micro sized databases will be a unique MySQL instance.

Good review. Plus that archive_command should have been built for handling multiple commands simultaneously to improve WAL processing

Take a look at ("LIGTAS") products too; it uses Spectrum Protect environment to protect open source databases. Https://ligtas.org

True IBM's philosophy are to backup only changed content (why backing up data again if it has not changed?) You can do progressive block level incremental forever on databases also now using ("LIGTAS") DB Protection https://www.ligtas.org A solution that uses Spectrum…

True And now you can do the same on databases using ("LIGTAS") DB Protection https://www.ligtas.org Progressive block level incremental forever on databases

Given the facts that progressive incremental forever is the most space efficient techniques compared to performing periodically full backups IBM's philosophy are "why backing up same content if it has not changed?". You can do the same on databases too now with ("LIGTAS"),…

True. Very flexible solution. You can refine which databases to backup or which to not protect. You can enable snapshot on the databases, and perform progressive block level incremental forever on databases using ("LIGTAS") DB Protection https://www.ligtas.org

True. We protects many servers with minimum impact; as it uses progressive incremental forever. We have also used ("LIGTAS") solutions to perform progressive block level incremental forever on databases.

Progressive block level incremental forever on databases with ("LIGTAS") https://www.ligtas.org