OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Data Protector | 1.0% |
| Veeam Data Platform | 6.1% |
| Rubrik | 3.6% |
| Other | 89.3% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup and Recovery | Apr 27, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 27, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Data Protector vs Veeam Data Platform | Apr 27, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Data Protector vs HPE Zerto Software | Apr 27, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Data Protector vs Rubrik | Apr 27, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veeam Data Platform | 4.3 | 6.1% | 94% | 432 interviewsAdd to research |
| Commvault Cloud | 4.3 | 3.6% | 95% | 112 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 213 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 95 |
| Large Enterprise | 100 |
OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.
What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.
OpenText Data Protector was previously known as Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector.
GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC | 3.5 | We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backups on physical servers, finding it effective for direct backups to EMC storage. However, it's not user-friendly for cloud or virtual environments, so we prefer Veeam for virtual machine backups. |
| Independent consultant at a hospitality company with 1-10 employees | 5.0 | OpenText Data Protector offers centralized storage management, cloud integration, automated and asynchronous backups, but lacks comprehensive documentation, especially for integration. While the system simplifies backup scheduling, clients seek solutions for VM backups and smoother version migration. |
| System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels | 3.0 | I use OpenText Data Protector for backups due to its simple file backup and compression features; however, it's complex and challenging to configure compared to OpenText VIM. My company aims to move consolidation tasks to OpenText VIM instead. |
| Assistant Manager - Data Center at Bank of Zambia | 3.5 | I've been using OpenText Data Protector primarily for Linux and Windows backups. It's user-friendly and integrates well with other library products, but its interface feels outdated compared to Veeam and Veritas. Management chose it for its Linux support. |
| Backup SME at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I use OpenText Data Protector for enterprise backups due to its ease of management and effective features like VM restoration with multiple streams and simple Oracle backups. However, the inability to restore single files from VM backups is a drawback. |
| Head Of Systems Group at NCCPL | 4.5 | We decided to move to Data Domain due to management issues, but I find OpenText Data Protector easy to use and manage. However, after upgrading to version 10.2, we encountered some certification issues that need addressing. |
| Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC | 3.5 | I primarily use OpenText Data Protector for backup and recovery across our infrastructure, finding its stability valuable, especially with Linux, Oracle, and SAP. However, it lacks development in features like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, and could improve in data protection and scalability. |
| Independent consultant at a hospitality company with 1-10 employees | 5.0 | <p>I found Micro Focus Data Protector a stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution with valuable features. However, I experienced challenges with R&D coordination, limited testing facilities, confusing licensing, and poor customer support.</p> |
