Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Data Protector vs Oracle Data Guard comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.6, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.3. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to Oracle’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
OpenText Data Protector
Read 101 OpenText Data Protector reviews
  • 1,876 Views
  • 1,199 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Oracle Data Guard
Read 31 Oracle Data Guard reviews
  • 2,695 Views
  • 1,828 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Oracle Data Guard are two competing data protection solutions, each with distinct advantages. Oracle Data Guard stands out due to its advanced features, making it preferable for robust, enterprise-level solutions.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is praised for comprehensive backup and recovery options, ease of integration with various environments, and strong customer support. Oracle Data Guard offers high availability, data integrity, and disaster recovery capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector users have indicated a need for better reporting functionalities, smoother upgrades, and enhanced automation. Oracle Data Guard users suggest enhancements in automation capabilities, more intuitive configuration processes, and better integration with non-Oracle databases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector has a straightforward deployment process and is noted for its responsive customer service. Oracle Data Guard's deployment is more complex, requiring specialized knowledge, but its detailed documentation and effective support help mitigate challenges.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is recognized for its competitive pricing and good return on investment, especially for small to mid-sized businesses. Oracle Data Guard, while more expensive, offers substantial ROI for enterprises needing high availability and robust disaster recovery capabilities, justifying the higher initial setup cost for larger organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Oracle Data Guard Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector vs. Oracle Data Guard
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
OpenText Data Protector support is mixed: some users see improvements, but many face slow responses, frequent escalations, and limited documentation.
Sentiment score
8.5
Oracle Data Guard customer service is generally effective but criticized for variable support quality and long response times.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.2
OpenText Data Protector's outdated UI, cloud integration, reporting, support, pricing, and performance issues make it less competitive.
Sentiment score
6.3
Oracle Data Guard is complex with high costs, insufficient documentation, technical issues, and needs better integration, monitoring, and regional support.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Opinions on OpenText Data Protector scalability are mixed, influenced by deployment, integration, performance, and user environment size.
Sentiment score
8.8
Oracle Data Guard offers scalable database replication, improved stability with Oracle RAC, and highly rated enterprise-level capabilities since version twelve.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
OpenText Data Protector is generally reliable but depends on the environment, with stability varying between Linux and Windows platforms.
Sentiment score
8.4
Oracle Data Guard is highly stable and reliable, excelling with large databases, though major upgrades require thorough testing.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
OpenText Data Protector offers robust data management, ease of use, automation, and broad infrastructure support with competitive pricing and scheduling.
Sentiment score
8.1
Oracle Data Guard provides reliable, easy-to-maintain data protection, high availability, and disaster recovery with robust integrity, security, and performance.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
101
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Data Guard
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Data Guard is 0.8%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.
Read full review
Azhagupandi Parthiban - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers near-real-time replication for data consistency and continuously introducing new features through upgrades
There are various advantages. First of all, easy to deploy. The only difficult part is the cost factor, licensing. In other ways, the implementation is very, very important. Like, we have not encountered any major challenges with replication. We were able to achieve near-real-time replication. Also, with the switchover failover, we were not getting any technical issues. It's a pretty stable product. Once you configure it, it goes through the rollback, and then Data Guard introduces this snapshot thing. So once the restoration happens, we can go back to the original thing, and we make that a standard. It's a pretty decent and key function for Oracle. So, enterprise organizations go for Oracle only for features like these.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?
I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?
Pricing is high compared to other solutions. If they offer suitable features and a compatible price, we can attract clients. If the tech support becomes good, the price becomes less of a concern. W...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?
Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector. This has been an issue, especially when troubleshooting or integrating with other vendor-spe...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?
Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?
It is a very useful administrative IT tool. It saves on costs. I strongly recommend Data Guard. I've been using it for eight years and I would strongly recommend it. I'd rate Oracle Data Guard a se...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?
We're Oracle partners. We've worked with databases 11G and 12C. If a company is planning to implement Oracle solutions, I would suggest they also implement Data Guard. I'd rate the solution nine ou...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 60% of the time
Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 16% of the time
Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 8% of the time
Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 6% of the time
Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 5% of the time
More OpenText Data Protector Competitors
Veeam Data Platform vs Oracle Data Guard Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs Oracle Data Guard
Compared 25% of the time
Veritas NetBackup vs Oracle Data Guard Logo
Veritas NetBackup vs Oracle Data Guard
Compared 11% of the time
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Oracle Data Guard Logo
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Oracle Data Guard
Compared 11% of the time
Zerto vs Oracle Data Guard Logo
Zerto vs Oracle Data Guard
Compared 8% of the time
Rubrik vs Oracle Data Guard Logo
Rubrik vs Oracle Data Guard
Compared 7% of the time
More Oracle Data Guard Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector
November 2024
OpenText Data Protector reportDownload OpenText Data Protector product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Data Guard
November 2024
Oracle Data Guard reportDownload Oracle Data Guard product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector
Active Data Guard
 

Learn More

OpenText
Oracle
 

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

Oracle Data Guard ensures high availability, data protection, and disaster recovery for enterprise data. Data Guard provides a comprehensive set of services that create, maintain, manage, and monitor one or more standby databases to enable production Oracle databases to survive disasters and data corruptions. Data Guard can be used with traditional backup, restoration, and cluster techniques to provide a high level of data protection and data availability.

 

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company
Athenahealth, Discover Financial Services
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector vs. Oracle Data Guard
October 2024
Free Report: OpenText Data Protector vs. Oracle Data Guard
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Protector vs. Oracle Data Guard and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Data Protector vs. Oracle Data Guard report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.