Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Dell Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Dell Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #24 with an average rating of 7.6. Dell Technologies holds a 3.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Dell Avamar

Read 87 Dell Avamar reviews

8,684 Views
6,251 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 101 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,769 Views
1,131 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Dell Avamar

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Dell Avamar and OpenText Data Protector are competing data protection solutions. Dell Avamar appears to have the upper hand due to its superior deduplication and recovery speed, while OpenText Data Protector stands out for its comprehensive feature set and flexibility.

Features: Dell Avamar’s key features include efficient data deduplication, quick recovery times, and robust cloud support. OpenText Data Protector users appreciate its wide platform support, advanced security features, and extensive customization options.

Room for Improvement: Dell Avamar users indicate improvements could be made in scalability, interface complexity, and flexibility. OpenText Data Protector could benefit from enhanced reporting features, simplified maintenance processes, and better user experience in terms of management functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell Avamar is considered straightforward to deploy, with dependable customer support. OpenText Data Protector, while flexible, presents challenges in deployment complexity. Users prefer Dell’s support responsiveness, highlighting a smoother overall experience.

Pricing and ROI: Dell Avamar has a higher upfront setup cost but delivers strong ROI through reduced storage requirements via deduplication. OpenText Data Protector, while competitively priced, offers moderate ROI due to additional costs for maintenance and support.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell Avamar vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Dell Avamar vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Dell Avamar

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

12th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Deduplication Software (3rd)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

101

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Dell Avamar is 3.6%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sebastien Chene

Senior Business Development Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Stable, integrates well with other solutions, and has a good price, but its UI needs a refresh

What would make Dell Avamar better is if it can do faster backups because right now, PowerProtect Data Manager is better in this area with its new UI and a new way to implement backups. Customers nowadays also expect more up-to-date solutions, and this is another area for improvement in Dell Avamar. It's not as up-to-date, so I'm counting on PowerProtect Data Manager, but customers who have Dell Avamar don't want to switch because you don't have as many backup problems in Dell Avamar compared to other solutions. What I'd like to see in the next release of Dell Avamar is an updated UI and a different way to manage backups because currently, backup management is a bit heavy for customers using Dell Avamar.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I found valuable in Dell Avamar is the deduplication feature. I also like that the solution can be integrated with Data Domain."

"It's stable and offers good performance."

"All the features in the system are highly valuable."

"Scheduling is valuable. It does a good job of backing up, and it does a good job of restoring. Nobody has got a problem with that. The agents are well supported."

"Dell EMC Avamar is easy to work with and is user-friendly."

"The installation process is pretty straightforward."

"Centralization is Avamar's biggest advantage. It moves data to a central location from various geographical locations."

"The stability of Dell EMC Avamar is very good."

More Dell Avamar pros

"The command-line interface is user-friendly and well documented in the reference guide."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."

"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."

"The solution is easy to use."

"It's a good product that's pretty easy to use."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"I have used Micro Focus Data Protector for the file backup facilities. My primary use of the software is to backup file data."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"We have had a lot of problems with the Dell EMC Avamar solution. The snapshots are not being erased after backup."

"The product could offer more integration capabilities."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The stability could improve, a lot of scheduled backups failed at one time."

"The initial setup is a bit complex and could be simpler."

"In my opinion, the user interface and the user friendliness could be improved. The specific thing I have in mind are the graphics, which are not quite user-friendly."

"The management of this solution is a little bit difficult for IT administrators. They have to be trained before going through the system."

"What would make Dell Avamar better is if it can do faster backups because right now, PowerProtect Data Manager is better in this area with its new UI and a new way to implement backups. Customers nowadays also expect more up-to-date solutions, and this is another area for improvement in Dell Avamar. It's not as up-to-date, so I'm counting on PowerProtect Data Manager, but customers who have Dell Avamar don't want to switch because you don't have as many backup problems in Dell Avamar compared to other solutions. What I'd like to see in the next release of Dell Avamar is an updated UI and a different way to manage backups because currently, backup management is a bit heavy for customers using Dell Avamar."

More Dell Avamar cons

"Microfocus needs to build a partnership with other vendors in addition to HPE as far as cloud consolidation of backups."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"Faster VEAgent Restores"

"The Micro Focus Data Protector support is not as good as Veeam Backup & Replication's support."

"I don't like this solution so much because it's very technical and compared to Commvault and Veeam, it's not so user-friendly. The interface needs improvement."

"It has a lot of undeveloped functions like window searching and patent searching, and within the main backup processes like VMware and Microsoft Exchange. It's completely not user-friendly, and it has no built-in antivirus software. In my opinion, Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution."

"People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison."

"In SAP restoration, we faced issues with changing the SIDs and changing the path for every backup object. It is quite a lengthy process to do that."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to competition the price is not what is important, it's not the problem."

"It is expensive. Its cost is the main thing."

"Dell Avamar is expensive."

"The price is fair."

"Dell EMC needs to lower Avamar's price and add more features to stay competitive."

"The solution is not expensive for the value one gets."

"Dell Avamar is free when we deploy the data protection. When we order data protection, this software is included in the hardware."

"This solution is less expensive than Veeam for us, although it depends on the customer because we get a great discount."

More Dell Avamar pricing and cost advice

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Dell EMC Avamar and Dell EMC NetWorker?

From the very beginning, Dell EMC NetWorker considers users and those who might potentially become users. In terms of both pricing and setup, this product offers an experience that is significantly...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC Avamar?

The pricing is not competitive enough.

See all answers

What do you like most about Dell Avamar?

Easy to configure and highly reliable for backup.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

Pricing is high compared to other solutions. If they offer suitable features and a compatible price, we can attract clients. If the tech support becomes good, the price becomes less of a concern. W...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector. This has been an issue, especially when troubleshooting or integrating with other vendor-spe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Dell Avamar

Compared 30% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell Avamar

Compared 16% of the time

Dell NetWorker vs Dell Avamar

Compared 13% of the time

Rubrik vs Dell Avamar

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Dell Avamar

Compared 5% of the time

More Dell Avamar Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 55% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Rubrik vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dell Avamar

December 2024

Download Dell Avamar product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

December 2024

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Avamar

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Learn More

Dell Technologies

OpenText

Overview

Dell Avamar data protection software delivers flexible and efficient backup and recovery operations that can scale from daily backup protection for endpoints to high-performance protection for large enterprises with diverse applications and workloads. With application consistent recovery, automation and fast backup and restores, Avamar can help you meet your SLAs and optimize your backup and recovery processes

If you are deploying all or part of your backup environment to the cloud, Avamar enables you to make the most of your cloud investment, enabling replication, disaster recovery and long-term retention for customers using AWS, Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud.

Avamar is available as part of Dell Data Protection Suite, which offers comprehensive data protection software applications and tools. Avamar is delivered as software and as a virtual edition.

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

Sample Customers

Dodge County, St Laurence's College, FieldCore (a GE Company), Comanche County Memorial Hospital, Getronics, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Cincinnati Bell Technology Solutions

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Dell Avamar vs. OpenText Data Protector

December 2024

Free Report: Dell Avamar vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Avamar vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell Avamar vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.