If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Licensing is VM based so you can buy packages or single VM. Price is not low but the power of application is high, so you will get your money back.
Pricing depends on your future growth. Start small and then scale up.
Licensing is VM based so you can buy packages or single VM. Price is not low but the power of application is high, so you will get your money back.
Pricing depends on your future growth. Start small and then scale up.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it.
Licensing can be either complicated or simple depending on what type of licensing you wish to use and what works best for your environment.
Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it.
Licensing can be either complicated or simple depending on what type of licensing you wish to use and what works best for your environment.
Dell Avamar offers efficient data deduplication and strong integration capabilities, appealing to tech buyers with its reliable performance and solid ROI. In comparison, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is favored for its comprehensive features like instant VM recovery and competitive pricing, making it an attractive, flexible choice.
It has a much higher bang for the buck than other products we evaluated.
The price is not a problem in NAKIVO, as it is the most competitive in the market.
It has a much higher bang for the buck than other products we evaluated.
The price is not a problem in NAKIVO, as it is the most competitive in the market.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
Microsoft DPM is a free solution. However, we pay approximately $3,000 annually for support.
I think Microsoft DPM pricing is reasonable. The additional costs are related to storage and technical support.
Microsoft DPM is a free solution. However, we pay approximately $3,000 annually for support.
I think Microsoft DPM pricing is reasonable. The additional costs are related to storage and technical support.
Features: Dell Avamar users benefit from advanced deduplication and efficient backup processes, reducing storage requirements. In comparison, Veritas NetBackup Appliance offers robust data protection and superior backup capabilities. Despite Avamar's ease of use, NetBackup Appliance stands out for its extensive features and comprehensive protection. Room For Improvement: Dell Avamar users note the need for enhanced scalability and faster restores. In comparison, Veritas NetBackup Appliance users desire improved integration with cloud storage solutions. Both products show areas for improvement, but Avamar's scalability issues seem more critical. Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell Avamar is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. In comparison, Veritas NetBackup Appliance, while slightly more complex to deploy, also provides effective support. Users report a smoother setup experience with Avamar. Pricing and ROI: Dell Avamar is regarded as cost-effective with a faster ROI due to lower storage costs. In comparison, Veritas NetBackup Appliance, although more expensive, provides significant value with its extensive features, justifying the higher price point. Users often find Avamar's pricing more attractive.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
Synology DSM is a cheap solution.
The licensing part of the solution is free. The hardware is more expensive than the other solutions in the market, but it's okay in the long run.
Synology DSM is a cheap solution.
The licensing part of the solution is free. The hardware is more expensive than the other solutions in the market, but it's okay in the long run.
It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products.
We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive.
It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products.
We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive.
While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses.
Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced.
While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses.
Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced.
Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor.
The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors.
Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor.
The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors.
FalconStor Software, Inc. empowers IT professionals to achieve mastery of their data – an organization’s most precious asset – so they can responsibly push the boundaries of what’s possible in the digital economy. The company’s award-winning flagship solution, FreeStor®, is a modern, comprehensive and easy-to-use global data mastery software platform that gives IT professionals centralized data management control across all their resources to reduce operational costs, lower risk, and avoid technology compromises. FalconStor’s vendor and hardware-agnostic solutions are designed to work with existing investments across complex environments, including legacy data centers, hyper-converged infrastructure, cloud, and hybrids.
InfiniGuard provides fast, reliable data backup and restore for business continuity/disaster recovery. Built with InfiniBox to optimize performance and target-side dedupe to maximize effective capacity for multi-petabyte datasets.
