OpenText Data Protector and Zerto are two competing data protection solutions. While users appreciate the features of OpenText Data Protector, they favor Zerto for its performance and reliability.
Features: OpenText Data Protector offers robust backup and recovery capabilities, supports diverse data sources, and provides integration options. Zerto provides disaster recovery, continuous data protection, and ease of use with seamless data replication and automated failover.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector needs better reporting and analytics capabilities and a more intuitive configuration process. Zerto requires improvements in scalability for larger environments and better support for additional cloud platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector's deployment is straightforward but complex for large-scale environments, and customer service is responsive with room for faster issue resolution. Zerto has a simpler and quicker deployment with praised documentation and quick setup, but more personalized customer service could be beneficial.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector offers competitive pricing with a positive ROI for small to mid-sized enterprises. Zerto is more expensive, but users find the higher cost justifiable due to superior performance and advanced features, resulting in favorable ROI.
Replicating my settings helps me recover point objectives faster and retain policies.
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.